장음표시 사용
321쪽
v. 966. 'φοὶ πικρος τέθνηκεν, η κείνοις γλυκυς, -τῶ τερπνός. ων γὰρ ηράσθη τυχεῖν, etc. Schol. 'Eμοὶ πικρὸς Ψέθνηκε. μῶλλον ἐμοὶ πικρος τέθνηκεν, ηπερ ἐκείνοις γλυκυς. Μ grave compares, Boυλομ' ἐγὼ λαον σόον ἔμμεναι, ἀπολέσθαι
Bra1nck and his successors aro silent. IVould not a b euer soraebe prodiice I 'by rea litig εἰ κεένοις γλυκύς IVe liave alaeady pr posed the fame conection in V. 179.
Sehaeser is the oesy editor Who has adoptod Porson's emendation, τουδέ f ἐκγελωεν. At niail mutandum rat, Fays Exsurtu, si quod nujusmodi versus non nimis ins quentes sunt, tum Propin
κατα δὲ τακόμενοι sor κατατακόμενοι δὲ . Ant. 9TT. V. 970. Θεοῖς τέθνηκεν ουτος, Ου κείνοισιν, Οἴ. This D seos tile negativo particle is elegant. See our obser atiora ori v.
322쪽
1489. Oeae C. 1342. 1389. 1399. Mat. 807. Ρhil. 633. 779 ΕΙ. 105. 267. 987. 1171. 1446. In ali inese passages, μὲν is
323쪽
Aoκεῖν πεσεῖν ών, - ν ἀπο σμικροὐ κακού. Beud, sic fore, χρόνω πότ' αν 'M ουρίων δραμουσαν. Tliis correctio ri has uia ad litional irierit os silui g up a disa ecabie hiatus. But wa in tnot dissenii te, fiat ine necessity os inserting αν in Passages Ithailiat betare us, is not universalty adinitted. See Boruch ad Aesch. Pers. 738. Soph. El. 442. Eu, . Phoen. 899. In re
γαρ θέλοντος ἐκπέρσειν πόλιν, Καὶ μὴ θελοντος, φησὶν, ουδὲ τὴν Βιὸς Εριν πέὁφ σκήψασαν ἐμποδων σχεθεῖν. Σχεθεῖν is iste infinitive os ἔσχεθον , a poetical sorin os Droν, sie aomst os Iris
324쪽
inmio , in duo Post ita vocabula in unum coeant. Nec Derendum, ne, si hoc modo statuam , alias cadentibus nouci subnascantur
325쪽
elision, ilian it is xviiii it. So Aristopli. Ain. 830. IID
I Seo Da es, Atiae. Crat. P. a I. ed. 178I. Da es a Canon is violato I in tho Oiglith fragment of the secottii Thesntophoriaetusaeos Aristophanes. The conclusion of thas Dagnient is thiis exit ibite t
Iities, as far as relates to the present Paestion, is si ita ject to iaci uti-
327쪽
V. 1126. m. Λίκαια γὰρ τόνδ' εὐτυχεῖν, κτειναντά με; TET. Κτεωαντα; δεινόν γ' εἶπας, εἰ καὶ ζος θανών. Is nae
481 v. 1129. Μή νυν ἀτίμα θεοὐς, θεοῖς σεσωσμένος. Du
328쪽
αμένων l ψῆφον ἔθεντ', ἀτιμω l σαντες ἔριν γυναικῶν. So
329쪽
moderra editions, Minout any exception, rea I κρυβεις. Thoinanuscripta are divide I. M a besieve that κρυφεὶς is sie lino reading. Tliis question has been discussed eis muliere. V. 1180. ' αυτον, ω παῖ, καὶ φυλασσε, μηδέ σε Κινησάτω τις, ἀλλα προσπεσων ἔχου. v. 1334. Μηδ' η βω σε μηδαμῶς νικησάτω δεσόνδε μισεῖν, ωστε τὴν δίκην πατεῖν.
continuation os Porson's note on I eo. 1166. Minoui the ii perative os uio aorist is hisdb ever sv oined to tho prohibitivo particla μη in the second person, it is sometimes so emplo in the stird person, as in the divo P sagos besora iis. Ive also
T. 1449. εἰσβήτω Εuxip. Tro. 1049. etc. Tho subjunctivo, ho-wever, occurs Inuch more frequently than sie limperative, especialty in prose, and is osten mia underatood by ino coluinoi-483 intors and translatore. Thus, in V. SM. of the Proinetheus, μὴ
γάρ σε θρῆνος ουμὸς εἰς ἔχθραν βάλη, Boinck insorans ira fiat
ως τίνος ἐπιστημονα τένης. Tne translatora treat thia passage as is the comition rea ruig vero καὶ τίνος.
330쪽
CoueCt: Donec ego reaiero, sepulcrum huic curavero. Coi
ἐπ' οἶδμα λίμνας. ovo these lines as theor are visitim in B ackla nimbranae and the Ravenna manuscript. According toste Scholiast, they are talcen Dorn ille Oenomaus os Sophocles. As Wo do not bellove that an Attic Writer, men in a chores ode, vi liave prefixed ως αν to the optative in the sense os Da, uva suspeet stat the passago in question is horro ed Dom Simonides, or one os the dother lyric poets. Admitting, ho Vever, ύρ ανποωθείην to bo a genuine Atticisna, and to siseusy ut Molarran, it irili uot justisy οπως προσείποιμ' αν in the Passago besore us,