Catulli Veronensis liber

11쪽

REVIEMS AND BOOK NOTI S.

12쪽

AMERICAN IOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY.

may admit, Our tali ing the negative Separalely with both verband Subjeci participie. -268 6I, 7 I), at queat: allegeri parallelsior attraction os inood may be questioned; the subjunctives belone chiefly to ideat apodoses; but at queat here cloes echo non queat whicli is apodotic to quae m Siqua) Careat.-II 8 9, 5), pluralis iterativus '; I 17 9, 5) nuntii beati is nom. Plur. , not

pollice; yes, as ei ther naue or in nave vehi, manu Or in manu tenere a 'proximate the one the other; the comparison of in

curtailed the review of my own motion. as, in deed, the book was Curtailed, on good advice Vorwort). Why ait this materiat was Dacked into a Commentary on Catullus we may wonder ; but letus be grate sul that the large book contains both interest an dinstruction. The book is not inerrant, hut I may be permittedio record a re mark of the late Prosessor Mau who, When Ι Commented in a rather banat way on the inerrancy of a great GermanScholar, replied something to the effect that he did not care sor

13쪽

STUDIES IN HONOR

PROFESSOR GILDERS LEEVE