Attraction of mood in early Latin [microform]

발행: 1904년

분량: 41페이지

출처: archive.org

분류: 미분류

1쪽

aS partis the Foundations os estern Civiligation preservation projeci'

funded by the

NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES

Reproductions may noti made ithout permission rom

Columbia Universit Library

2쪽

State Code -- concern the mining of photocopies orither reproductions of copyrighted material ...

Columbi Universit Librar reserves me right to refuse toaccepi a copy orde is, in iis judgement futtiliment of the ordo would involve violationis me copyright law.

3쪽

LANCASTER PA.

4쪽

COLUMBI UNIVERSIT LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT

Master Negative

Origina Materia asilinae Existin Bibliographic Record

TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA

RI MED BY RESE ARCH PUBLICATIONS INC OOD BRlDGE. CfNITIALS

5쪽

in ches

us suu tuus tuli iliuit

in b

6쪽

ATTRACTI ΟΝ Ο ΜΟΟD IN EARLV LATIN

Ebe universit o chicasio

7쪽

db universit Otrubicasio

A DISSERTATION

9쪽

places certain cum-clauso in Plautus unde the categor os ab traction. Eiste, Richardson and Boetiger explain certain examples of the subjunctive illi dum a diae to tho amo influ

sed i cove tho fioleso garly Latin are notinals complete, constantly botra a Iachis undorstanding o Early Latin sage, and mahe no analysis of the materiai. Novertholes the have beeno value a presentin the largos collectionis suci materia fromthat important period. o ali of the a vora avo givo dueeredit hora tho have bos found serviceable. M attention a fini called to this subject is Professor Hale, o in foverat of his orlis has thrown nem light upo the obscuro problem. Referenoes to thos mill e found in tho bod of thistreatis' in hic it milla omo apparentino great is findebbednescio him, not onlyrio specific suggestions, ut also for mypoint of viem method, and even grammatica nomenclatur and

classification. I saying this, ho ver, I do not Wish toto unde si Mas implying that Professor Halo agroos illi mo in tho into pretationis ever example nor in ali si reagoning. As regard my Way os approachin the subjeci, it may bo aidinat, after orhing foris considerable time ver the wholo angeo Latin literaturo, Udiseovored that Lmas dealing it a chany in construction, and that thorefore, a historical reaiment Wasthe oni logical one Furthermore, it Meam apparent that theorions os iste se of the subjunctivo by attractio aro no to et hod for in the langvago os artistic prose, it iis various conscious artifices for the constructio appear foro the time offuch mriling, and in simple form themther hand sinco the

Die Syntax vo Quom 1870, cf. p. 125 1I. Domum Particulae Usu Plautino 1882. Domum Particulae apud rise Ser. Lat. 1886. Domum Particulae Usu apud Terentium et in Bel Trag. et Com. 1887. Zum Gebraue de Temporaleonjunktionen ei Plautus, 1881. . De Sententiarum Temporalium apud Prisc. Ser. at Syntaxi 1878. De Temporum Usu Plautino 1888. Syntaria Prisc. Ser. Lat. 1861 and Syntaria Frag. eaen. Poet Om.,

1882. INTRODUCTION a

construction, in the ver natur of the case, elong to hypotaxis an a atri mel develope complex sentence, me need notaecome involvo in tho misis of paratinis Eari Latin a me have it,ma thereforo confidently be calle on' explain tho boginnings. havo aecordingi trie t maho a thorough surve o Early Latin domo Lucretius. From the oint of vie thus gained pr0pos in a secon pape to hete the later usago of the construction. Ilio incalle constructioni attractio by the infinitive ' has omo hings in common it in one here realed, ut sine the data ossere is early Latin arario meam to ensuro infegeneralietation, I propos to postpone iis discussion to a lateriaper in hieli Vinion to uso statistic gathered from classica authors

as etl he old Overed by this sapor includes Plautus,

Terenee, Cato the early dramatio fragmenis, hie ara found in Ribbochys collection, and tho romaining fragments of tho early Roma poets, hicli ars found in tho fixi volum o Baehrons' collection have, illi se exceptions adopted tho teri a giveni tho ditions amod Tho lisis of example Min large, theerror are lihelyrio balane ono another tho Otho hand thodiscussionis ali examples for hic the manuscript readings varywould swel tho or in impossibi limits. My troatinent alis unde two hoads: 1 the fources of the comstruction; 2 tho ses of the construction.

10쪽

number of years ago Professor Hale minted ut the way in ita tho orions of the constructio no unde eXaminatio mustia studiod. o says in his Sequenm os enses' American

tences madem os a main sentence illi subjunctive ver and onoo more subordinate sonteneos the moda feolinii tho spoahor'smin whic expresses itfel in the main sentenco is in the nature of things, very lihely to continuo in tho speahor' min in the subordinate sentene or sentencos, ither quite unchanged orauisliotly haded. f for Oxample, I say in Latin, Tot him sondwhomao ili, mittat quem velit, tho ood in velit is notis caseo attraetion assimilation ' at all. Velit is as uoli a jussive a mittat is Τhomoaniniis, Totaim cli se his man, and send that man Por, in oldo Ensisti Chooseae his man and sen him. In se ques sent que sibe deicerent necesus se Baeana habere C. L L. I, 196), tho deicerent is a muta afuturo condition se ques deicerent as sentcis.' Again, alio frequent recurrence of such examplos sive ris to tho occasional use of a dependent subjunctivo illi oni a forma litanessio the main subjunctivo, and no truo moda seoling.' Lator horeiterates the statomen in a aper o the Anticipator Subjunctives p. 63 Dotnote).Τhis ordiniimplies of murso that tho constructio in question is a thing brought abotii an developed. A for Professor Halo' interpretatio of the ood os velit an deicerent, there can disputo, and it is ni bello that in tho Otho main division of the subjunctive also, a great number of tho cases usuallytreate as examples of attractio are tote interprete in the same

Universit o Chleago Press 1894. Reprinte in Studies in Classical Philolog of the Universit of hicam, Vol. I, 1895. THE 'OURCES OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 5

Way and that these mustra distinguishod from thos whie arei realit duo to the habit os attractio puro an simple Thodistinctio might ol bo expresso in tho torma os Professor Hale, ho speah of the ood liho feoling V and that of

forma likeness. ViWe re in Seeh, then, for combinations in hic tho modat eo, in expresse by the main or ma naturali cast iis hadomove the subjunctivo clause obviousty there out be a limite numbor os conditions undor hieli his is possibio. The condition are favorabis hen oth tho orbs main and subordinate are in the samo grammatical ense, and are place in the fame actua time-sphere. Such a stato os assair mambo illustrared by the examples above, o by Aul. 491, quo lubeant, nubant, et them maro hero the please,' i. p., det them in se their

place, and maro here. VThese clausos occurrireel in dependeneo pon subjunctivos of

illustrations:

With a substantive volitive clause: Bacch. 674, Occasio . . . fuit . . . ut quantum uelles tantum sumeres, there a opportunit to tali a much as Ouwishod as uo as ou hould Wis V).Τho condition ars es favorabis hen tho subjunctive ver though in the fame grammatica tenso, is no in tho fame time- sphere a that of the main clause An example a Miseen in Cas. 252, iam domuisti animum . . . ut, quod uir uelit fieri, id

Between the more favorabis conditions and tho Ios favorabiolio tho condition in hie it is impossibi to toti from tho comteri hethor tho subordinate ver is in the fame time-spher With

SEARCH

MENU NAVIGATION