De mysteriis. Edited with critical and explanatory notes

142쪽

Euphiletus too the opportunitro my absene to assure the resto the company alsely that I ad consented, and thata ad agraeclo ut the Hermes, ear my Palema home, hiel the tribe Aegeis hin dedicatsed, mrote, Nisi. Gr. L 39.

ετι πεπεισμαι καὶ ωμολόγηκα. A transition to the oratio recta. See ames, Mi8 . Crit. P. i. riiger, r. γ

Amitat tho genera mutilation O the HermeS-buSti, ne very celebrate imago, hic hau been erected by the Aegea tribe anisso diear the door of Andocides, was test entire in faet which tendedi strengilien ine belles that he had Men murio the sacrilege com-

143쪽

initted on the est,' Thiriwall, Hist. Gr. iii 39I Sed aut Pandionido aut Antiochide erat Andocides Tab lor, Leci Lus. e. V. P. 25 Reiske . Quum essent τῶν ευπατριδων Andocidis proavi, facile potuerunt istius Hermae curae ab aliena tribu praeponi aut etiam curatoribus adjungi, iobree.'Aθηνησιν. Iota quod vocatur mutui diligenter Servatur omittitur tamen constanter in dativo AOΕΝΕΣΙ, quae unie Vera Scriptura est,' Franc Ulem Epigraph. Graecae p. Ill) i. 6.cos μου, inde the impressio thates Would caro out thia. Here Oiso retera, O to an particular ord, butio tho genera notion, in the recedin sentence themutilation of the Hermes b ore my u u Oor. For ως vitii future participio, se Hadley, Gr. Gr g 978. 63. δεινὰ ἐποίουν. alchenii propOSed δεινὰ ποιουν θ'

mindignabantur. Foraan reete. Sed non prorsus rejicienda vigata intum uuabantur. δεινb Vel δεινα ποιεῖσθαι est pro re indigna habere, uno Verbo indignari. δεινα ποιειν

Lugae, ' obreo. Plus tibi nocebit nostr inimicitia, quam aliorum proderit amiciti per odium nostri tibi comparαta,' Reishe.

144쪽

For the interclianae of αιτοι and ἐκεινοῖς, se Note ad As οἶν, do Aho thereiore that his a true, both Ideliveredis my lave tot tortured, o prove that I Wasill and could notisve rise romia bed, and the Prytanesselae the iemale servant of the ouse liene the Setout an committe these utrages. The constructio is rendere someWhat complicate by the Geminatio Conjunctionum V ti s ... ὁτι), ut differs lighil ironi that potate out in the Note ad gQ9. For such ornis as τι o Ddληθῆ λέγω - nois, o prove et a I 8a is rue), hieli, as ite a the appen in Aeschines-and the appear

Dobree Advers. p. 317 has made a collection o Whath calis loci insignes Vesrom the Orator respecting this hideous custo of the Athenians. i. Hermam, Polit. Ant g 14 l. 13.

145쪽

Notes. 123

Such om o tho infinitive εDα δἐ in continuanda oratione, Vore common in the rose riters. i. g 12. See ermann V0. n. 305 Shilleio, Dem. J D. Leg. g 349. Schaser, tui. v. 50 177. Muger, Gr g 65 11. Obs. 6. 55. . obs. . obree, Advers. p. 114. Who calis it Infiniti riis in narrando, potius dicendus in nitivus continuationis. N

146쪽

s perintly to iis antecedent; as in the old formula Zεος, ωτις λεγι υτος υ ιστος τε. Seerat lo0. πωπιν των εὐάνθρωποι ἁπιστοτάτην. aerebam indπιστοτάτην, et conjiciebam νοσιωτα ν. Sed id ipsum dicere videtur Hilgata ut γάμος γαμος, etc., apud Tragicos . A boni subversive fili Ond8. πίστις, α ple se.

Lysias, p. 127, 18. I 5I, 8. 1 2, 23, iobree.

in the fame Sentenee, With both pronouns referris to the 8ame per8on is notis allisnfrequent in the Oratorsu utilio usual orde of Wordiis that κεῖνος appear in the secondelause, an nos, achere, in the first. So 64 ειπον αὶ ola...

147쪽

Pholpodrio conceat thei transgresSion.' πρὶν 'putas Θεθηναι Se Note ada 89. 68. υτοι See Note ad gQ8. - δε γε contra On theother harid, Germanice agesten. i. 136. Aeschin Ctes. 28. 117. 246. Dem. Fals Leg. 02. 18 342. Xen. Convis iv. 3. . . IIae particularum conjunctarum δέ γε vis est, ut adversando extollant et adaugeant,' vero, at certe. Cf. Eur Ion 368 1304. Heracl. 109. 356. Bacch. 505. me. 21. 1248. Electr. 1224. Orest. 547. Androm. 462. Iph. Atil. 331, V Fix. See also Schneider, lat. Rep. iii p. 400B. Porson, Eur Ore8t l236. Cobet, Nov. Leci. p. 435. Shilleio, Dem. Fals Leg. 102. ut his formula is evidently ut o place in Xen Hellen iv. 1. 39 od L. indori See Schneide ad loc.

149쪽

Seu Note ad gQ. nothe was Epichares. Se 95. 99. Aliother Callias, tho son o Hipponicus. See 10. 12. A nother, again, Meletus. Se 94. O Meletus, Curtius Hilat. r. v. 147. says, Probabi identica with tho

ille τοὶ and the γέ:- Existimo Atticis non licuisse γε postro ponere, nisi alio vocabulo interposito. V See also his adversaria,' p. 33. and Cobet, Cor. cci P. 60. Nov. Le t. 684. O the other fide se Lobeck, Phryn. P. 342. Heindori, Plat Phaed. p. 224. Franke, Aeschin Ctes. I 3I., and the authorities there cited Accordinito Kruger Gr. Gr g 69. 5. Obs 3 With αἱτοι- γε the hassecla ni the wor it follows, while illi καίτοιγε it

150쪽

as et the whole clauso and that the fame distinction