De mysteriis. Edited with critical and explanatory notes

202쪽

g 139. σφων δ αυτων, and nominated Cephisius to Qtheir avenger, the vilest o the Atheniatis.' ut o hecan o the viles of the Athenians, hile ho is no an

204쪽

Persedit in character ere the rit aes of the re-est ablishod Democrney, amely, iis ingratitude to Alcibiades and the judiciali clerii the generat Who had WOn the batile es Arginusae, B.C. 406.

205쪽

ἀνηκεστοις συμ hostias, do involve the state in incitrabio calamittes.' Pape cites Antiphon, B. . 12 p. 35 ed Blass)

207쪽

io repea the article illi the seconi infinitive. i. Dem. r. 280 sin. 290. 294. 32 l. Dinarch. c. Dem. 5. ut thenit is on condition that the infinitives e in a mensure Mynonomou8. ut here the meanings ure distinetlysiisserent, or in contrast illi inch other, the article is re

the nominative 'hen different, in the accusative. I mayliere' addod that when the subjectris in determinate, theconstruction is infinitive With τὀ and the accusativen Anti-

208쪽

men, an haVing ad experienee o very many thing in consequence of Whicho have ad ios o hospitalit an liriendly relations illi many both ings and states, and

excuses ad Isaeum, P. 39l such blunders Sed hae in re nonnunquam minus diligentes Veteres scriptores fuisse constat.' My wn de is that these tundors thus Charged against the V veteres scriptores lare reali dueto the recentiores librarii, V anxio m vie an able tooffer omething otter ilia an ipse dixit. I recenti col

209쪽

condemne in any oi thei accounts.' 'ut the true readiug