Zeitschrift für Keilschriftforschung und verwandte Gebiete

351쪽

332 Theo. G. Pinches, Additious and Corrections to the Fifth Volume

352쪽

of the Cuneisorm Inscriptions os estern Asia.

Col. II., l. 3. Compare l. 83ςd of the plate, Where the scribe seems to have copten xk instead of htis on account of the likeness belweenthese two characters in the Babylonian style. l. 4. Line 84 gives a Asu-tum. One can eastly understand howal and H, and su and si could be confused in the Babylonianstyle, but it is difficult to see how is and te could be con-founded. The word is probably attesitum or ille pirum. ll. 5 and 6. Here the scribe of the large tablet seems to have confused two lines, writing natasu and nasiatiam instead of nahi nand nasivum. D. T. 58 is probably the more Correct . l. II. Here the large tablet, line 88ςd, is probably more correct ingiving Muttim instead of g k. Col. III., ll. 2 and 3. In these lines the large tablet gives a badly-writtenARer l. 8, judiling hom the traces of medges Whicli rem ain os l. 9, the texi again dissered Dom that of the large tablet.

353쪽

334 Theo. G. Pinches, Additions and Corrections to the Fifth Volume etc.

355쪽

Johannes Latrille

359쪽

Johannes Latrille