Zeitschrift für Keilschriftforschung und verwandte Gebiete

412쪽

Assyriologi sche Notigen gum Alten Testament.

414쪽

Assyriologische Notigen gum Alten Testament.

416쪽

Assyriologische Notigen gum Alten Testament.

417쪽

398 Frieor. Delitzsch, Assyriologische Noti gen gum Alten Testament.

419쪽

as in the 34 personat plural of the verbal aorist. By a

Curious accident, this termination CorreSpondod in So undio tho contra ted form of the Babylonian adverti, and woneod not be Surpri Sed, therefore, that the writers of tho

artificiat litorary dialect whicli Sprang up in the Court of

4. Inter Change of h and m in Acca dian. An othor examplo of tho intercliange of δε and m orrather mi in Accadian is found in the word whi h answors to the Assyrian saMSu. In W. A. I. IV. I7. 26. the ACCR-

IJ I use Accadian in the sense of non-Semitic, and not as prejudging the difficuli question as to whicli of the two chies non-Semitic dialects of Babylonia the names Accadian and Sumeri an Ahould be applied. Besides those two clites dialecis there were sub- dialecis as weli as the artificialdialect used by the scribes and prie sis of the early Semitic hings. The question is renuered more difficult by the two facts that the cuneiformsystem of writing continued to develope after iis adoption by the Semites, new compound ideographs being invented and older characters being employed with new values. and that the translation of Accadian words and sentences by Semitic scribes is not literat in the modern Sense of the word. Moreover I see no reason for Supposing that the Accadian became extinctin the marshes of Babylonia besore the age of Nebuchadneggar, so that borrowing would have gone on belween ii and Semitic Babylonian for many

420쪽

is expressed by Ast. It is possibio that it ought horo