The consecration of the eucharist : a study of the prayer of consecration in the communion office from the point of view of the alterations and amendments established therein by the revisers of 1789

42쪽

lowing, wa inserte a rubri referring to the Narrative Rione; i. e. 'Phese oord before rehearsed are to e suid, turnin stili to the Altar, Uithout an elevation, or heising

lli Bod and Elood os Christ.

43쪽

humbi aedes is misplaeed in the meri an Liturgy, a distoeation alien ver ironi the Englisti Book a properi yit hould preeod immodiutoly the aetua reeoption os the Hol Communion The continuit of the Prayer o Consocration illi the sirs par of the naphora, o Canon, Would thon e seon more clearly a the note o prat Setini than ksgivin is aught up and redehood in Viewo tho redemptive aurifice of the croSS. For e muStroeat that tho Cano Missae, like tho Groeli Anaphora, Wa more anciently underStood o bogin illi the Sursum Corda, and thus to include the reat aut O thanksgi vingior creation and sor redemption, of hieli ho Sanctus was tho centro Thu the Gelasian Sacramentary the Missale Francorum, the Sacramentur os Gellona, and the Loosric Missat, placo tho illo Incipitiano Actionis, bolore tho Sursum Corda; herea Ordo Romanus . put thoieginning of the anon, a now, after the Sanctus, and beior the prayorae igitur.'

44쪽

4 THE CONSECRATION OF THE EUCHARISTSon; who ad there by his ne oblation os hirnsulsone offered a tuli, perieci, an Sufficient Sacrifice, oblation, an Satisfaction, io the in of the whole orid. This staternent firsi ahes iis appererance in the Book of 1549, illi the exception o tho ord of himsoli ' in the parenthesis, b his ne oblation o himseli nee offered, ' hieli ere intro lueed in tho Book of 1552. The momentis the rosci Strongi emphaSiged evidently with a vie to reclude an notion o a repetition os the Same. The theologians of the later Middio gos 44ad come o regar the Sacrifice of ChriSi as exclusivel expressed bymis deathipon the croSS, and ut the Same time, popular opinion ad asserte no oni an independent propitiator value for the Eucharistic sacrifice, ut also

a remactation o Christ therein. The elaus unde consideration ould 800m to have been framed to meo this error, idely current in Crannior' lay It must ther0- foret interprete in iis positive aspectisnly, a it ouldbe mos urireaSonable to argue negati vel thereirom

parallel to thesiast, is stato Milio ad that Christ instituto illi Eucharistic memorial imis sath: and id institute, and in his holymospe commandis to continue, perpetua memor o that his preelous death and sacrifice, uriti hi domin again. V Then tollows in illustration and proos of this Staternent, the Narrative of the original Institution intro lueed by the causa conjunctiori For. Thi narrativo is virtuali a quotation tollowing hiesty the Pauline account 1 Cor. i. 23-25), ut combining

idd. The Later Mediaeva Doctrine of the Eucharistic Sacrisce, p. 24 seq. Ibid. 00 105-113.

45쪽

yis Chap. V., p. 222 241 for the significance of the para- graph unde consideration, in the yes of those ho rought aliout the adoption os ur present America Prayer of ConSe-eration.

46쪽

THE CONSECRATION OF THE EUCHARIST

48쪽

o THE CONSECRATION OF THE EUCHARISTot 1552, an non reappear ill the Book of 1662. Tho Scottish Book of 1637 however, ad reintroduce the two margina rubri esti 1549 with flight verbal differendos, and ad addo a direction to lay the and po any VeSSe containing in tot consecrated. In th Book of 1662 hos are inserto together illi ho addition o adirectio for the ries to rea the read, and also tota his and pon it. The ast margina rubri in urAmerican Book is the only one that alis for particular notio at present: an horo h is locia his handispon

th elemonis ill be ad unti Phe Invocation, it is evident that to e consocrated ' refers to the as et)futuro hallowing of th broad and wine by God in responset Our praye to that end in Phe Invocation Thes gestures in the arrative o Institutio have noother original significando than a mimetie or illustrative, in an Liturgy. Even the gesture no practiSed during

the rodita os humarrative Qui pridio V in tho Roman

non Missae are in thei ultimate analySiS, no rea exception to this state1nent, a the have rown to their present complexit and altere character as the result

1786. It is absolutolyisertain th reforo that it phrase toto consecrated V anno possibi heriairi presso into the service of the theornwhicli trivos o foro tho Roman notion os consecration VPon Our America Prayer of Consecration. f this phrase had heen SU0-POSed to negative the amendmonis mado in 1789, it would have been altered, a Was the rubric for a secon consecrationis elements.

49쪽

mission a Onee ior ali originalty Spoken by Him. Parto His command we have at ready obeyed in the resaee an Sanctus, i. e. than kSgiving and no having readiverou Charier, the commemorative sacrifice is orthwith obe made, i. e. the element ar to e offero in Christ' smemorial an alter that again the are to e hallowed

an sanctifi0d by thomoly Spiritis God.

The sedon paragraph of the Prayer o Consecration

incit no oni do e declaro ou obediene to Christ' scommand this, ' etc.), hieli command we have justretiearSed, ut e actuali carry ut an ac complisti that obedione to that ono specia definite command . Whorosore. O Lord and heavent Father, aecordingto tho institution os thyrasearly boloved Son ur aviour Jesus Christ. V e declare that, are actin in necor maneo illi that origina institution jus recited, and thon 'at nee e go on to mali the Christ-ordainod memorialbeior God the ather, by means of the antitypicat mad

See Chap. IV. 00 146-174. s. Scudamore Notitia Euchari lica, Secon edition, London, 1876, p. 602-607 616 20.

50쪽

made the memorial.