The consecration of the eucharist : a study of the prayer of consecration in the communion office from the point of view of the alterations and amendments established therein by the revisers of 1789

71쪽

IHΕ ΝΕ TESTAMEN RATIONALE 31 soli, in illustratin his relation to the Gentilo Christians, a figurem speech derived iro in the Christi an Sacrifice, i. e. tho Eucharist, ather than rom any Jewisti oblation I

tionabi to have been the sam ironi the egi nning. S. Paul' priostly et in presentin with thanksgiving the oblations o brea and win in dominemorationi Christ 'sSacrifice, and the Divino acceptanee o thos giit uni tho

add, the ni adequate patieri ior his compariSon. That I should bo a minister o Jesus Chris to the Gentiles, ministering in Sacrifieo the ospe o God in ordor that the offering of the Gentiles might be aeceptabie, bein sanetifi0d by the oly Ghost. V It is no the

o the Eucharistic naphora a soli ou sed ut in his

72쪽

was his in the minimo the primitivo Chureli, that we hali See these wordes of the Apostle early employed by Christianwriter. in referene to tho hallowing of the Eucharistio

μετὰ εὐχαριστίας λαμβανιμενον αγιάζεται γαρ διαλόγου Θεοῖ-αι ἐντεύξεως.

73쪽

ili meaning of tho Romania non Missae perverted by ane theor o conSeeration, and the wea Englisti Prayero Consed ration involvet in that misianderstanding, ut ou American Prayer o Consecration e shal find in agro0

74쪽

CHAPTER III

75쪽

Tho Didache has nothin to ur purpose, boingintiroly usidesrom tho current of the Chureli' liturgient tradition. f. BishopGore, Dissertations p. 53: In the document calle tho Dida hewo have a specimen os an ina loquate, in locisive Jowisti Christianity It has incl00 hrohon illi logalismini circumcision, as a rosul in partis the clostructioni J rusalem and tho Templo hut it has ot no distinetivo Christian thseolog bHyoni theharro recitationis the formula os baptism. V s. Note L pp. 374 seq. QSD PD. 377-378, he Church and the Ministrν sotirili sedition London, 1000.

77쪽

their eonSecration, O to the consecration a the actis the Personat ord, theraeconii PerSonii the Trinity Or, again, perhaps to the ordis ulterane os the Invocation iseli. Irenaeu alSO givo us a moSi pertinent lines in his d0Scription o a nosti materialisti eounteriet oi theChureli ' consecration o the ueharist. He says i a certain Mareus, Pretendin to consecrate eup mixed

With wine, and extendin to great longili the wordis the Invocation, he malle them appea purpi and reddisti. V Wo ma includo here also the witnes of the second)Piasti an iragment, it hout committin Oursolve to iis genuinoness. It is quite in harmon with the ollior eaeh- in o Irenaeus, an also illi th liturgida tradition that emerges into the light in the ourth century. For e

78쪽

into any the meaning. δOrigon 185-252 A. D. mal se distinet referene to the primitive custom o consed ration O tho ueharist 3 prayer. In his commentar on ait XV. 11, he SayS

Seo Appondix, p. 249. Cf. Bethune-Bnkor, p. cit. P. 40 l. Cf. Harvey' Irenaeus, Introduction, Ol. I., P. ClXX. ClXXii Cambridge, 1857. So AppondiX, P. 250. EVen howevor, is ortullia ha meant to assor that Christin the institution malo thoirpa toto tho sacramunt os His BOdy bymis declaration this ould hymo pans prove that he thought the Churoh was to consecrato meret by an historica recitatis thenarrative containing Christ' declaration

79쪽

Sacrifices.

Firmilian o Caesarea, rit in to Cyprian, 25 A. D. , Spenk os a Coman who even dare miroquentlyrio do this, namely, o pretend that with an invocation notato b eontemne listi consecrated breui and ad the Eueharist. V Dionysius o Aloxandria ' e. 264 A. D. say he would no dare o ob aptige in Who h ad istonod to tho conse-eration, and ad otiae in ultering the Amen, and who

80쪽

been made, re mere element s. ut hen the great arid