장음표시 사용
92쪽
present. For his infinitive, hieli obree Ad ser. t. p. II 4. calis In initivus Continuationi , ' se Noto ad 65. Notice also the arrangement of the conjunctions -
Ἀλκιβιάδην μεν ... τουτους μεν ... συμπαρεῖναι δε ... παρεῖναι δε.
Horo h firs με has it correlative in the secondrac, and the seconi με it correlativo in the frs δέ. i. Dem. Fit D. Leg. 109. 122 init. Dem. Cor. l. l4. Aeschin Ct M. 53 258. See niger, Gr. Gr g 69. 16. Obs. . utimania, Mid. Meurs xii Shillefo Dem. t D. Leg. g 159. 13. ὰπ έγραχνε, denounced. Cf. 5. 7. 9. 34. 3. 47. No 23 απογραφη, denunciation. λαβε καὶ ἁναγνωθι. In P ve have ἀναγίγνωσκε ' λαβε statim et celeriter peragendum. ναγίγνωσκε aliquid temporis postulat, V Schomann Isaeus, p. 236. For καὶ hortiantis, se the passages referre t in the note ad
93쪽
this is an empi pretexi hicli ou misapplied Lysias
Xii. 37 ταυτην γαρ ἐσχατην κην δυνάμιεθα λαβειν, or his is the mos extrem punishmetit,hicli, can inflict. Sese
also Noto ada 39. ser 'Av8ρομάχου There is no more certain testi thenecuraeno individual Gree writer tha their use of thopassivos o equivalent formS Witho, and a genitive. In the bost writers his genitive almos invariabi denotes perso)iat, or at leastiviri objecis Thus, hile Aeschines in his three orations containing 6,0l lines exhibit fivo instances Where sueti object are inanimate ani impersonal Ctes. 7. 207. 239. Timarch. 178. Fala Leg. 2.), Xenophon in his Convivium V an Oeconomicus V in hichlatior ortio an discern no grammatical or stylisti creasons for questioniniit authorship . though e sesiirro,ith a genitivo ni foriy-three times, et has no essthan wenty-two Xamples of this auli constructio in the paco of 3, 466 linos i an in ne asSage Oecon XiX. li has three suci in the fame paranaph. On the therliand in tho three genuine orations of Andocides notine single instanc is to bo ound ior δεσμῶν in implies livis agent nor et one in Hyperides, ii e excepi c. Dem. xlx 16, Where it has been inseriodi his editors.
94쪽
επαγγελλεται, he notities the Senate, that ii theyMould grant him immuni , he would ive information about tho profanation o the Mysteries, as havin been himseli an active participant, and would informibout themther. cf. 13. 14 Who committet it in conjunction illi himsoli ci Not ad DII ; and What he linei ab utrili mutilation illi Hermae.' For ἐπαγγέλλομαι See Pape' leae. For i, so Note ada 40 Andocides repeat this account in si M.
ηδειν. It must e borne in minii that tho Grook of Andocides sis contemporar o Thucydides and Antiphon bolonge to the est period o Atti literaturo. In his
95쪽
time, thereiore, uel a formit the hird person a 3δει forfδειν, a certaini no in se. Se Rutheriord, eis Phryn. p. 226 234. 235. 238. Labr. p. l. 2. Cobet, Nov. Leci P. 1. Par. Leci. P. 382. i. Arist. Vesp. 558. Paae, li82. χνη νισαμένης της βουλῆς The genitive absolute may
6 6 97. What great latitudo tho Groelis Howe them selves in the use of the genitive absolute illae apparent
96쪽
Inde in voc. V Nominativus.' Se his note also ad i. P. 209. γενομέν η δὲ καὶ Elicovos, and who ad also beeti thewii Oi Damon. Here e have γενομένη, ν ho hau been, not tho definitivo an distinctive form ὴ γενομενη, sh thath ad been So Aeschin Ctes 202 κακουργον νθρωπον
97쪽
jeci. Observe also that here e have tico infinitives, ille go verning infinitive hould stand last. Se Dein Phil. i. 15. 19. Cor. 58. 104 128. 210. Thereiore the oracular reSponse, a id to have been ive to in Pyrrhus in Latin, - Aio te, Aeacida, Romanos vincere OSSe Whos mollier-tongue mus have laeen Greela Cauer, Deleci. Inscript p. 173 - 1 53, could nos possibi have been misconstruo by him, ii accuratet eXpresse in reela,
φημί σε, Αἰακιδη, νικα δυνασθαι Ους Ρωμαίους.
that, in ad suci constructions the orda τούς τε ἄλλους Or, a osten, τα τε αλλα are alWay govemed Solely undo xclusivEly by the ver sor participle o the si si clause, whilo the objec that follows καὶ καὶ τον πατερα φή isgoveme solet an exclusivel by the verbis the secondclause the καὶ in iaci, introducta a quasi- independent
98쪽
to φιλανθρωπευ5 1ενos That hilleio roto hastily ponthis passage may be concededri ut that wil hardi tomor that eminent schola in the estimation o any one holinows under hae circumstances his Demosthenes assidited. ε κεκαλυμνιενον, palli involutum, ' Reisho. Observo also μεν. o/, non mutat Subjecto that is, no contrastingtwo different persons 18 19ὶ, ut Wo disserent conditionsor actions of the a me perSon. i. m. l. 36 48. 50. 3. 89. 99. 114. Schater, Plui. i. 442. Appar Crit. De m. v. 111. 186.
her of the senate deliverei them ove to the Dicaste . 'Ci. 22. 6.
an hoe licebat citivis Senatori ' mobree. There are severa circumstances notis it intelligibi respectinithis γραφη παρανομων whic Andolaides alleges that his fallieri uot against the senator SPeusippus heiorem iliastery of 6000 persons a number very difficultio belleve ut of hom e says that Speusippus ni obtaine 200 votes. ut is his tria too placem ali, e cannot heliove that it could have talae Place, utili atterulae publie minxWas tranquili ed
100쪽
metit here madet Andocides, se Thiriwad and roto ascito in Noto ad gQ5. He se the optative designo Cy no the indicative to haverit implied that thei statem nisa re fal8e. So agai 40. l. 3. 110. II 3 137. i. Her mann Soph. Oed Reae 525. λεγοντες. his participi Sero es t illustrate an important principi affecting the hole language, and whieli, in the phose riter eSpecialty needito berulearly understood, namely the emplobunent of the predicative participle, as distinguishod ironi the attribu ire participse By this is meant an anarthi sit participle, alWays subjoined in sense, an almost alWay brought in toWard the lose of the Sentence, and torming a generα predicat o the precedingactions 'ords, etc. Aeschin Timar h. l Ἀξιά σουσί με