Corpus Inscriptionum Arabicarum Palaestinae

21쪽

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA

22쪽

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA

CORRIGENDA

The tae marbutah in the wor i mii dat is not visibio. This correctori rea lingnee is a ta mandiutah which could wolt have been in placo in the woril miruat, at tho enit of the fit si homistich.

23쪽

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA

L. 5 This is my correction to my original rea ling of the soconii homistic

24쪽

XXIV ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA

The possessor of sublimisy; he w o is adorneci by Virtues.

thon the translation is 'The possessor of sublimity, he w o hy virtve of igh qualities is charitatile.

25쪽

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA

This inscription is so closiaceo that iis reconstruction, as inclicate i in my rea ling, involves a tot of guesswork, baseil on similar inscriptions and litorai Soui COS. EPigrat hors make an effori to ovei come the technical problems aswoli as the clamagos of the teXt. Sometimes their Cyes miss part of the tOXt, theres ore, the term 'grave mistake V or 'especialty gravo mistake V whicli Diomuses l999 304) is not part of thoir toxicon. This is particular true in thecase of this inscription. The main objection os Diem to my suggesteo reconstruction of the inscription is that the sultan concerne i is Abu Sasio Ja lina whose name ne reactat tho enit os lino 3 instea i os atris ras Barsb . I cloci leo that tho latior was the sultan mentione i in this inscription, not bocauso I could reail hisname, as I Clearly inclicateii, but be ause of the perfeci preservation of the late 840 about whicli thoro cannot be any cloubt. In this year Ja lina Wasnot Sullan, nor in the year after. He took onico only in 842 jum; i5 256). But since Dioni is suro that I macto a 'gravo mistako' in attributingitio inscription to Barsi, , who hari stili more than a year to livo when the inscription was erigi aveo, ne tries to clo tho impossibio. Admitting that the

26쪽

XXVI

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA

27쪽

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA XXVII'. . . sprea ling iis abundant ligni; and the clate is reac ed by 'This is my mosque whic gnt eis virtves'. When calculated it is the year lil ml702-33 in WD3.

Diem's contribution to tho rea ling of this inscription mutilateo by the brustios an ovorreatous patiator, is important, but not satisfying, especialty the sinpari. It is stili open to improvenients by the reaclCI S.

L. 2. There is a problem in rea ling one worii in this line. Futuro rea lers in finit tho solution.

28쪽

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA Cori CCtions.

29쪽

ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA XXIX

The clate Correspontis to numerical value of the woriis bali

30쪽

XXX ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA