장음표시 사용
31쪽
Par II reat of Right V in genera I De Jure in stenere in
relation to persona , rcy, and actus.
Law, in acti case, illi reference to persons, hings, obligations,
delicis an diuties. In Paris V-VII, Me pasci romia and Righis to the means by whicli Rights are en forcedi namel by Judicium,
in iis successiverit ages o causae coquitis, decreturn, and coercitis,firs in Private, and then in Public Law; in each case illi referen C to persons, hings, obligations, delicis an diuties. At thesetopic a re discussed in the phraseolog of the Civilia , osten in sentences ta ken exitiali fio m themiges and Code. It must berem apked that the work after deal in fully illi Private Law, Publicia , and the Procedure applicabie to ach, en d Some-what abruptly, without ad lingis ordo what ad been a id in the Firgi Partis to a coni muni inter diversos Principes et Respublicas. It would rather feem that although he had there anno unc ed his intentionis dea ling, illi his topic it,agini ata much later date, and perhaps notuit he had care fuit studi edthe great work of Grotius in ly ver recenti publis hed when the Elementa V wa written. that Zouche seriousi turne his attention to t. o much of the generat scheme of the Elementa a relates to the Law, Public o Private, hic licis en for est yeach Statemve thos subjectu iis urisdiction, as,orkediu byhim. in de tall. in the series of monograph whicli appea re in rapid succession frona 63ψ to 6ψo: hut it, a notu ill 6ς thathe publis hed anythingipon the hod of rules hich goveri therelations of each overe igia State to the est He had by thenutili Zed incit ould seem a periodis en forced eis ire io in Academicat uti es otio non alias felici to complete, by the
with hicli the Elementa, ' and the monograph whicli folio edit, had familiari Zedis: notabi the distinctioni et ween Right '
Grotius complain that e writ rs ad toti heci upon, and non systematicalty ius illud quod inter populos plures aut populorum rectores inter edit. Proteg. I.
32쪽
to distinguisti e tween Right an Remedies is in deed stillreta in ed. Par Pisi ea de V De Jure inter Gentes,' and Partes I ' De Judicio inter Gentes V i ut the contents of the Se Parisi notcorrespon to thei tities Both Paris alii e re a both o Peaceand of War Partes of Peace in secis. - , of War in SectS. 6-IO Par II o Peace in sect8. - , of War in secis 6-ΙO the di Stinctionie tween the contents of the tWΟ Parisie in g, a We are Warne din the Address to the ea der, between ules hi chlare atri Welles tablis hed quae sunt minus dubitati juris hicli, whether the relate to Peacem to War, he places in Parid Pandieba tablem alter quae videbantur uri controversi ), hich, hether the relate to Peace mi, Var, he di SCUSSe a Mopeiam Vestion S, Withargument pro and con . in Par II. It might in dee die suppos edfro in the mentions illi hich hi Pari commences of War, Arbitration, Litigation an Pressure o Publi opinion, a themo des in hicli disputes a re se ille be tween Princes and eo ples hic hiscknowledge no superior, V that, unde the ea ding De Judicio inter gentes, V, a re bo ut o re ad ni o Proce dure, having this object in vi ew; butine oon discovers that hi S
33쪽
peace, but subordinates the lalter to the forme r. Zouche was the fi ps to conceive of the topic a a hole, an dio recogniZe that war, illi, hici, hi predecessor had ma in lybus ted thenaseives, si ut a means, hereby, in the lagi regori, theright whicli Nations enjo in time of pe ac may be vindicate d. a me esto ed pon his topic the reali descriptive illewhicli, in iis translated ornas, has larget superseden the ambigvotis term Jus Gentium V stili lingering Droit de Gens V Vol kerrectit in , by hic licit ad eguit to e known. Aster
examining the ambiguities, hic hi eget his term hen employedio describe theiod o generali received rules, hich goveri there lations of State orata te quod inter Principes vel Populos diversarum gentium communiter intercedit in , he anno unces his intentionis ivinito that hod rules, partiali deat with in the Roman us Feciate, the nam Ius inter Gentes V WJus inter gentes placet appellare in This collocation of ord gladi in deed,
occurred, a it were accidental ly, here and there in the page of earlier riters, supti a Victoria, VasqueZ, Suare Z, and rotius. but was no for the fi rgi time deliberatet adopted a thema me ofa Olenoe which, as a' hole had previ ous ly been nameless. The subgequent hi ς tor of the term is ellanown. The hancellor D 'AgueSseau, in r716. commend to his son the stud of cerati 'on appelle te Droi des Gens, oui poli parte plus correcte ment, Par ceque te non de Droit de Gens a ut aut re gens, te Droi erat releg Nation V; so to the a me effect in 7 o. the Abbe de S aint Pierre. ut it a Jerem Belatham ho . in his irincipies of Moral and Legislation V 789, secure the genera adoptionos o uche' suggestion, by coining the term InternationalLaw, ' a W calcula ted to expressi in a more significant way, thebranchi la 'hich goes commoni unde thema me of theia vos Nation S. V
34쪽
a The wor is rigidi methodicat, in accorda iace illi scheme approXi matel suggested by that followed by the Romanjurisis, in distributing the topic si Private Law. like in Par Iand in Pari II, and intacti illi refere iace both to Peace and War,
the discussion turn successi Vel upon PersonS, Property, V muties, ' an rong Personae, Dominium, Debita, De licta . Itian noti sal that the topic o Internationalia arethus classi fiexto the best a duantage nor is the choice of termin-olog always of the happi est e. g. Debitum V is no ordinarilyemploye to OVer obligationes,V hether ex contractu V or
pate the progreS Whicli a been made in the literatur of the science during the wo centuri es an a hali hic hiave lapsed since the publication of his book He id excellent service byworking ut hi System illi scrupulo us ii SomeWhat pedantic, dilige iace promoting the reb the intelligent Stud of the Subjeci, and entiti in his reatis to the prat se long ago besto edispon it by on Ompte da p. asa as the sirs text-book of the whole La osmations Da erste Lehrbuch de geSammten Olker- rechis), an iis author o b describe by Rivier gwe iter Begrunde des Vol kerrechis V Vith these Xplanations the ver fuit able o Contenis ill
The writer described by A Wooxas the livin pandecto the law, Vinives ample eviden celere, as in his the workS, Ofhis familiarit with the Diges and Coderand thei commenta tors, asinis With a wide ange of classica authors. For initiation intoboth hind of knowledge he gives credit in ne of his Dedications to the training hich he had received in the wo amous Wiccamica Colleges pueritia ultra adolescentiam humanioribus literis et juris studio institutus V s B ut the wor abo und nolint in , is saws V roin the
in modern instances,' gathere frona Europe an history a is
35쪽
eviden ced by thei occurre tace on p. 9, 3-IS, 22, 23, 26, 28,
6 Unlike sonae of his predecessors, o uch fuit achnowledges the assistance hici, he has derived frona earlier ritersiespeciali froni Gentili and rotius. It has been though likelyto hem se fulcio appenn to this editionis the work a ful Inde of
36쪽
there ill e found the original lis o Errata, the tength fwhicli is attribute to the imperfections of the op supplied by
the author, an toti ab Seiace frona X ford A care fui re ad ingo the teX has, however, hown that his list Si no means X- haustive. It has there fore been though deSi rabie to prini at theend of the book a more complete list, in hich the errata Originali indicate a re incorporaled illi thos to hic li attention has no been calle for theirs time. The editor has been fortunate enough to Secure the Semices, a Stranslator of the Ius eciale, Vis his frien d r. . L. Brierly, E C. L. Barris ter-at-la an bello of All ouis College, hois also maint respons ibi for the fur the lis o Errata, an forthe Index os author cite d.
37쪽
Quae ad Pacem mellum inter diversos
Principes, aut Populos sipectant, ex praecipuis Historico jure-peritis, exhibentur.
Authoris Elimentorum IurA- rudentiae.
39쪽
Urno Elementorum Iurisprudenti. pro ratione Comni unionis lumanae , Iuris Judicri fundamenta eXhibere instituens; primum pro Communione in genere, luris e Iudicii principia generalia' Deinde pro ea, quae inter person 19 Pri Uaetas, nec non quae Privati cum Principibu intercedit; cum Privati, tum Publici Iuris, Judicii regula tradidit. Postea pro Communione speciali, utpote Sacra, quae Rel gi nem . Pia ς causia ς, Militari quae Militiam armatam Givilem Maritim arn, quae Navigationem, Negotiationem , Iesidalem quae fidelitatem, Iacem respicit. Juri. Iudicii Sacri militaris Maritimi, Ieudalis descriptiones contexuit: Atque in prioribus ad Iuris Civilis aut horitate; se astrinxit . ad postremam , scilicet Feudalem Consuetudines Mediolanense MNormanicas applicuit.
Tandem ad Explicationem eorum quae ad Communionem quae inter diverso Principes aut POpulomintercedi conducunt perrecturus, alio authores nimirum Historic jure-peritos consulere ne
cesse habuit Equibus Riberi cum Gentilem , Hugonem Grotium pro Coryphaeis habendo duxit, utrumq; omnis generi eruditione insignem, quorum ille ad Iuris, hic ad Rationi trutinam quae tradit expendit. Alios etiam Authores pro subjecta materia adhibuit propositis primum quae sunt minu dubitati iuris, ea quae videbantur juris controveri ad quaestiones redegit. In quibuς statuendo quicquam pro sua sententia abstinuit : Consultius
Academiae Socraeticae instituturin imitari ra uS quae post causa , ratione allataς. quid in unaquaq; pas re dici Ossiit expositum, Audientium iudicium integrum atque liberum reliquit. Hac qualiacunq; sunt. I ivina favente Clementia , pro Muneri quod aliquandiu in Academia sustinuit officio in Iuventuis studiosis vi a tiam ii non alia fallici composuit. Que sit alus in usum me sibi in pnrjudicium cedant. quta in voto habuit, conseqhletur.
40쪽
Cum Errata qua plura, Semplaris minus accurati, 'ut horis absentiae occasione contigerint Lector rogatur,ut minutiora, pro suo judicio, alia prout animadversum est, emendas non