Demosthenous Peri tou stephanou. Demosthenes On the crown; with critical and explanatory notes, an historical sketch and essays

발행: 1901년

분량: 395페이지

출처: archive.org

분류: 미분류

331쪽

as a States naan vitii Aeschines, pro testini against laecon a parison o laina sel xvith thecia eroes of the past. Tlae reis alSO a recapitulation o sonae na atters atre ady discussed'

VII. The Peroration, in a single earnes sentence, i an a Peal

332쪽

the word μήθ' ὁπ' αλλου μηδενός anno reasona ibi appl to any CXCel tforeigia cro vias, and theia 47 ad J SQ καὶ δια τοῖτο προσέθηκεν ο νομοθέτης μη κηρυττεσθαι τον ἀλλοτριον στέφανον εν τω θεάτρω ἐαν μη ψηφίσηται ὁ

interpretation of the lax in 7. his is of tself suspicio his, a it On- Ceal the Only naportant Oint, the exac relation of this Claus to theres of the la v. The laus whi Ch precedes ἀν ... δῆμος in 7,

κηρυττεσθαι τον ἀλλότριον στέφανον ἐν τω θεάτρω, is Certaini no Par Ofthe la v for vitii his the lax Couta needio interpretation Further, the

333쪽

vhicli the had just eard. I conses the whole passage 35-48 in

the speech of Aeschines has osten seenae tomae on therarotin is tolle an addition a ad after theorial It is a plece of specialitea ling, vhiCh greatly wealcens the force of the argitinent, an it is Clearib ananS Ver an an uia satisfactor one to the repl3 of )enaosthenes It should e rea ted like ther sina ita passages in Aeschines, Or Xana Ple, the repl3 to the arguiment of Denao Sthenes abo ut Philananaon, heloxer, in I 89. 5 One fac is no v naad certain 3 inscription S hate ver naab have been the et ter of the lax against proclannation in the laeatre, Such

335쪽

a. Theotis in Ction hiet Neen a. νόμος and a ψήφισμα at Atlaens vasmost important . A ψήφισμα vas an enaCinaeiat solae Senate mi

336쪽

318 ESSA I S. II.

x See Aesch. I. 3 8 ἔν πολείπεται μέρος της πολιτείας, α των παρανομων γραφαί. εἰ δε ταύτας καταλύσετε, ... προλεγω μῖν τι λήσετε κατὰ μικρον της πολιτείας τισὶ παραχωρήσαντες 5ὶ e the vlaole Passage. Thuc. HII 6 P ἐσηνεγκαν ἄλλο μεν οὐδεν αὐτι ὁ τοὐτο, ξεῖναι ἐν ζημιονε tetria γνίμην η αν τις βουληται ην δε τις τον εἰπόντα η γράφηται παρανόμων

η ἄλλ* τετροπω βλάφη, μεγάλας ημίας ἐπέθεσαν. Aristot Pol Ath. 92M. The Stiprenae Corrat os the severa states liave the saliae right os declai ingunconstitutional and nul acts of their o via state legislatii res, a conflicti no ithei ther in state constitistion or the . S. colastitution There is an appeal to laeU. S. Stiprenae oriri in lae alter case ruit only vlaei the Stat cour hi Plao id olae

337쪽

io lae Unite States by the Constit tition nor irata ibi te by it to lae

vorkin os lais tria systen o legislation an te sponsibili ty, questions soon arose viaicia Called for the exercise of Judiciat author ity to deterita inexvhether an a Ct f Congress or of a state legislature vas in Conilio vitii the edera Consti trition or laeti aer an Ct Os CongreSS Surpedio vel Swhicla lae Constitution reservet to the states. I his authorit3 vas plaint veste in the edera Cotiris, speciali in the Stirenae Cour asthe lai glaesi Cour os appeat in the and die O ver Canae by direct descent frona the Colonia period hen roya Cla arters, laicii the Coloniat legislation naus Conforna, Stood in ille position os urit tenConstitution S. The Colonia Couris Could leClare latus iatili vhi h vere Opposed to the Superior authori ty, and in Certain cases the in in Counci by decree exerci Sed the Sanae right'. Aster lae revolution, betore the Constitution vas rati fie J, Severat States adopte the o l

lectarei laxus uti vhicli id not Conforna to laeSe this, lao ve ver asno allo vex vithout grave oppoSition Τ.6. It is a naistahe to suppos that he hi serenae Couri an declare an Ct o Congress unConstitutiona and vo id on it o via notion Notoni can it no do his, hi ut it anno declare an ac tinconstit titionalsinapi l)ecatis it is ast exto do soci)3 petition. o natile it to Ct ona Constitutiona question, a CaSe naus Conae hie re it in the ordinaryCotirSe o litigation, generali When a person vla seel aggri ex ed 3 Ilae operationi a lax vhicla e belle vecto ibe unconstitutional appeat frona the decisionis a lo ver cotiri on his poliat and thus hiring the constitii

338쪽

tiona question directi before lae Supreine Couit in sti Cla a way that itimust e decided Tlae decision, laougia nominali affect in only the legalit 3 of the appellant' action in i Sobeying the laxu, reali set iles theiula ole question os lae validit os lae a v iself and ii stan is as a valid

principi in suCla Cases that a lax is O t be declare unconstitutionaluiales tiae judges are Convince that it is o beyon alloeasonabledo ibi. A ederat udge naigiat vitia per Ct Con Sisten Cy rei Se to et aside a lax as unconstitutional vlaenins a legislator he had vote againstit on his eryaround 7. In the OnapariSOn whicli ve are Imalcing the decrees of the Attaenian Senate and Asse nata correspondo the latus of the . S. Congress and the Soloni laxus of Atlaen to the . S. Constitution. The angers of a de imocraCy vhicla is not cepi in balance by the Constant pressi ire fis laigher a v keepingolae ordinar legislation in

Aristot tibici et 8 κύριον δ' εἶναι τ πληθος και η τον νόμo τοῖτο ἐγίνεται ταν τα ψηφίσματα κύρια I ἀλλα μη ὁ νόμος μοναρχος γὰρ ὁ δημος γίνεται, σύνθετος ι ἐκ πολ λων ὁ ὁ Ουν τοιοῖτο δημos, τε μιναρχος ων PVτε μοναρχε, δια τομη αρχεσθαι πo νόμου, καὶ γίνεται δεσποτικbs και ἔστιν ὁ τοιουτος δημος ἀνάλογον των μοναρχιῶν τη τυραννίδι δι και τλῆθος το αὐτο καὶ ἄμφω δεσποτικὰ των βελτιόνων, και τα ψηφίσματα σπερ ἐκεῖ τα ἐπιτάγματα Aristolle derives lae governnient xviii cliti calis δεσποτικη ρxystona lae laveho et ' po ver ver his lave se POl. III 8 2,

339쪽

invalid i it conflicis viti the ederat Constit tition Iri England no

analogy in lae Englista Constitution It is obvious that England with

possibi radica legislation vhicli lias pro vel So effective, and et Sosina Ple uncter a pure dena OCrac in the Jnite States. Congress could not, XCeptis an Ct os revolution de prive the resident of any of his

340쪽

in See Aescia. ΙΙ. 99, 2oo ῶσπερ γαρ ἐν τη τεκτοπικτὶ, ταν εἰδέναι βουλίμεθα τοOρθον και τ μη τον κανόνα προσφέρομεν ..., υτω καὶ ἐν ταῖς γραφαῖς ταῖς των παρανόμων παράκειται κανων του δικαίου τουτι TO σανίδιον, καὶ το ψήφισμα και οἱ παραγεγραμμένοιν ὁμοι. αὐτα συμφωνουντα χλη OG επιδείξας κατάβαινε C. f. 9 I, 92 Dena. XXIII.

SEARCH

MENU NAVIGATION