장음표시 사용
321쪽
an Acarnania. On his return lae stat alis hes teli arctis
in reus and later in Eretria Ai ).
322쪽
Negotiations hiet veen Athens and Thebes, endita in
323쪽
333 334 Rebellion o Thebes Alexander Capiti res an destroysthe cit aut inan Os 335ὶ. Alexander denaand the deli very os Denaosthenes, L. Curgus, HyperideS, an other Athenian orators. Aristolle return to Athens and teache in the L. yceul D. 1 33o. Alexander' Victor at mela Oct. I, 330. Rebellion os Spartan Min Agis early in 33οὶ, crushed by Antipater. 9 Aristophon Archon Tria o sitit of Aeschines against Ctesiplaon Arigus 33 co) Ctesiplaon accituite bymaorethan Mur-fifth of the voteS. Dena ostiaene condern ne i to a sine os o talentisor Coin plicit in the assat o Harpallis Inable o pay the fine, e ventrio prison an after vard in t exile. De ath of Alexander the , reat May, 323 a Balbylon.
325쪽
326쪽
πράττων τ αριστα τω δήμ ω,-and πρόθυμός εστι ποιεῖν ο τι δυναται αγαθον
327쪽
mentsin ivlaicla Ctesiplaon iusti fies his proposal to cro via in are false and therefore illegat. Aster a se vord of intro Jhi Clion, illo ved ab astior account of the private lis of Dena Ostiaenes lae reat of his tilblic
occupies the renaainde of his tinae in lae discussion o variotisma atters vlai Chiave Libearing on the patriolisnam States naan si illino Denaosthenes,
aina in in ali to lao v the sal senes of the ternas sed by tesiplaon. In Severa passages e urges the Judge noto alio, Ctesiphon to ad onDelmosthenes to lea his Cause and i the pernat Denaosthenes tospeat at all, o Conipe hin to solio v the sanae orderi arguiment in thede iace vhich he has inasel adopte in the attach. I his ast votii lliave compelle Dei nosthenes to reply in the egi nning to the strongarguiment of AesChines on the deg alit O Cro viain a responsibi e magistraten his Dentosthenes has no de of cloing, scit voti id vealcen his xvhole positio before the COUrt. 3. l he argunaent of Aeschines bri est stated i a solio us
328쪽
important, heres ore, o bring in his wealce arguiment be tween Nodivision of his historica statenaent, and thus concea iis deseCis frona observationi. He Couin no male a single real in his narrative and
there introduce his fore igia stubjeci xvithout ii tali in his design too obvious an injurin his a se. ut he artili divides his CCotint of his public se in to three paris for plausibi reaSons, inhiCh do notsuggestii rea ob)eCt. In lae Complain of the Charges foret gn
again Si hin an to these e proposes to reply be fore e Conae to the Charge Whicli mperi belon to the a se. Under his ead h. put Sthe Charge relat in to the Peace of hilocrates 346 B. C.), and e proce ed at iaceo deat vitii the negotiations ivlii Ch e to thi event. He votita neve have thoiught of imittin this important matter, in v hicli later evenis ad triuin phanti vindicate his o vn CourSe faction and his indignation at Aeschines for bringiniit in to the a. Se
Libanius a v liis ansul device se his Hypothesis 4 6, ὁ δ ρήτωρ καὶ π τ
πολιτείας την ἀρχην ἐποιήσατο και πάλιν εἰς ταύτην τον λόγον κατέστρεψε, τεχνικῶ Sποιων. See lae Seconci Hypoth. g 5, ob μεν γὰρ ἄλλο his δύο ὁμους, τον τε τωνυπει θύνων και τον οὐ κηρύγματος, ει το μέσον του λόγου πέρριψε, στρατηγικως κακους ες μεσσον λασσας, τό δε ἰσχυροτάτ* εἰς τα ἁκρα προσκέχρηται, το σαθρον των ἁλλων ἐξ ἐκατέρου ρωννύς. See also note On Cor. 6 .
329쪽
diploimati tritura ph of his life ,hit e postpones thena untii e canintroduCe thena later a an isset to the acts of Aeschines done in Philip's interest. When the CCotint of then fornas the naos eloquent Passage in the oration j i6o 226ὶ By this sic di plan he gains xv ina portant objecis. First, he divides the account of his politica life in to three paris, and void wearying the hadges γγ telling the whole tor covering eight imo Si eventit ears in one Continuous narrative, in hicli twould have been a les effective. Seconii ly, he succeed in introduc ing
i it is notice at ali, anaid the excitin evenis xvhicli e trio Chaeronea. The three Cotirses of evenis thus divide Mare so attirali 1 distincti that nothiniis osti thei division to e conapared vitii the do ubi graua. 6. The solio vin is the ourse of the argui Dent in the oration On
The stu ectis acti division is stated in ille notes vitia greate delati here the
330쪽
1. Introductor l 53-59.2. Delance of his pul)lic polic Confine Chieli to the perio lsrona 346 to 34 B. C. and of his trieriarctai la 60 109. 3. Repl to Charge of responsi buit as a naagistrate li 0 119. 4. Replyrio argument abo ut lae place of mclamation l 20, 121.5. Conclusion : 122 125. IV. Lis and tharacter of Aeschines and his public soli cy in the interest o Philip coimpare ivitia his ivn agen C in negotiatin an alliance vitia Thelbes against lailip 126
opposition to Philip : D160 226.
Viti 14 26 the delance of Ctesiplaon, propei lyra called is finished. 'lae oratoritas revi exve his vliole political se aiul has justi fieci lae langiuage os 'tesiphon's decree; in lae has replied hiri est to the ollae charge of illegali ty. In lae lineo laicia remainsae discusses ille inatters Suggeste by me Speecla of Aesctines.