장음표시 사용
21쪽
interestin and important doctrine into thei higne classes. De importanc incleed os ne doctrino is no pernaps sussciently appreciated nor is ne necessit os understandin it fidi con- Sidere 1 or in no vledged, o meret in demonstratin the nice accurac and even nilosophica precisionis in Greel language, Dut in determining ne sense defining ne real orieci, an evencorrecting tne interpretation Os passages in force of uniculaaigni nave Deen inade quately conveve in a translation. Rea for
nol saltu the divinit os cur Saviour, is atteste 1 and confrine IDyrine sinapi and insorce simicture os angvage undonat ontne contraryrio fuit ne preconceived opinions of pr dice, an to
invalidat in foro os inis evidelice, ne plainest ternas of commondictio natis De torture an distorte frona liet usual orna and meaning and made Suuservient O urinatura interpretation as,sor instance mal in σωτηρ a prope nante, aerei t elude ille application oscinarp's canon. Liet it also De onservedana thoughtne sacre pennaen rote a tne1 Glisserent talenis, diications, habit an association rendere natura torinem, et unde ine
22쪽
23쪽
GREE nouns ire no essentiali an necessarily precede by
vordis God the so arce of triae Dio x ledge liope, and consolation. In genera the artici may b accounted or, and a Diox delige of the particular objecis designated even though notisanae in the pri cedui conteXt, Ima be presupposed in respectu theaearors orreaders. Tuus Mati xiii 2 τὸ πλοῖον is the boat whicli vas cepi constanti sor Our aviolir. X. 2S. τυ οἰκίαν that Diown hous ut vhichae vas accustonaedri reside a Capernatuit. Jolin XXi. 20.ε τῶ δείπνω, i. e. os the Saviour vit his discipies, vig the ast passover. ut his vili e et ter understoo when the persectidentit of the pronoun , as in Homer for unic si sequent ter generali used αὐτος orci κεἰνος, and the articleia, has been considere l. t is prope ineres ore an necessar t ascertain thenatur of the article, vitat ure the miles Whicli regulato the uso osit, and wlia occasion iis usualis incidental omission. The Greel propositive article is the pron Oun relative o, ne relationis xvhicli is explained in sonae adyinc annexedri it by the parties ple os existence ν expresse or understo0d. The artici enui 3 se considere a the si Mec os a pira positiora, and iis adjunctas iis predιcate. huc πατηρ is the Sameras λων πατηρ, he who is
24쪽
nexed, and 9 tne participi os existences somni ni proposition of vnicniacis lae sit ecf πατηρ ille predicate, and in copula. ne proposition no ve ver is that os assun ption αν, no Os assertion, εστίν. nis passage of Lulce, xviii. 27 τὰ sc ὀντα αδύνατα παρὰ ἀνθράποις, δυνατά εστι παρὰ τα Θεω, afford a Di exanapi os theus of the artici in nruri in assunFtion, a distinguistied rom
The artici Dand ne pronoues are essenti allyone sanie ning, disserinioni in naving or no hau in an alunci. Whon it is a
Τρωες θηκαν Αθηναίης ἱερειαν. refers to ne an naentioned justDesore. Descri Ding, Π. 793. ne conflict et voen Hector and Putrocius, 1 SBVs του δ' απο αεν κρατος κυνεν βάλε Φοῖβος Ἀπόλλων - δε κυλινδο αεν κανάχην χε ποσσιν φ λπων. Is in sentenceended nere at ππων nicti it mignt inolit creatin any ODScumty, tuen ovould according to ne common distinctioia, De pronOIII referring t κυνεν, as του is a pronoui Whicli refers O Patroclus B ut ne poet nas adde in ne ex line, αυλαπις τρυφάλεια, o vhic ascit predicat Decomes in articie notrina itcnanges iis natum os pronoun, ut meret fromone accidental introductionis an adjunc it assumes the nam an personiis thefunctions os an articio. Dis pronomina natur of , o clearlyostatilislied in Homer, villae Dund o De triae innuersassy. Seo, sor instance, Thucydides i. I. τοῖς δε αλλη γη εστ πολλη ς ααουσι. Se also Isocrate. referrinito Hercules and Tantaliis iis naentioned, e Says, τον με διὰ τρο ρετρο αθάνατον εποίησε, τον δε διὰ τροκακίαν ταῖς μεγίσταις γωρίας κόλασαν Soph. in dipus Tyr. 1072. Tης γαρ πέφυκα μητρός. Initio adimitte 1 non that tuo artici is no ther iliari a pro
in orde to develope the ideas falle spealcer vovi De destroyed, andone Wouia Deconi as independent of acu ther asci ineyoccurre in disserent propositions ὁ ἀνηρ naus signisy, eis tuemale einc or assumed o De a naan. ne conclusion villae the
25쪽
sanio in an lectives: Ἀγαθος in Ἀγαθος Σωκρατη φιλοσοφεῖ is
equivalent to ὁ ων γαθός. Sometinae even verand the Marticipio of existence Xpressed, as οἱ μάλιστα αξιοι οντες. An assurriptive copula is also necessarii understood et veen the participi and the artici presXed, asci φυλάττων, erod. ὁ μενων ε εμοὶ, JOhnXV. 5. q. d. ὁ ων μένων, ὁ ων φυλάττων, unies indeo ita containod
villiin tho participio iiseis. For ων ui De presumed to e smuch containexand incorporaled vitii Θ μενων the participis of tho PreSent ense, as ens, though notis sed as a si pie vor b tho Romans, et enter in the composition os theti activo participio
Thois octi in relation of the article is more Orcies obscure. Τ th min os in spealces hinaself the de is alivavs sanaitiar; buto in reade it nutu e obscure, and theres ore require ne addition os in prodicate, Whichris then absolutet necessary to ne perspicuit os the son se sor vitii out ne predicate iself, it Would Decina possibi sor the reade or ea re to anticipato t. ii thoarticio ui a thenae said o b anticipative, i. e. Os sonae subsequent vor arising in uristin aster ne article is pronounced a in B Om. Vii. 21. ευρίσκω αρα τον νόμον, it is anticipative of What is
about ora scribo, ascinipelling hinario evit, even vnena is endea-voumn to render a spiritual obediencerio God M, en in articio, vitii the vor annexed refers o sonaething ulready known to ne hearer, an atready mentioned, it has a retiospective reserencs in Whicli caseoli noui annexed might De sal to De superfluous. But vhen the ning referredo is unkno vn to ne earer, ne reseretice is O something assumed o supposed isndrinis is stulod hypotnetical referetice. Tnus in ne passage frona Aristolle, πλουτεῖν οὐ ράδιον τον ελευθεριον, ne naeaniniis that supposini mant D liborat, it is difficuli forcii in to De ricli. In in forine usoos the artici inerofore, nat is the retrospective, the obscurat is greater o less in the lalter use the hypothetical, it is total since, ascit vas suid bove, it is impossibi for theaeare to anticipateth predicate. his accounts also for the uita position os thoartici an iis predicato, ali good writer placing the artici innmediately, or ulniost ininaediately besore iis predicate. Bocause theresererice belli mos generali anticipative, the nilnd of tho hoarer villiso bear long suspense, ut ver thing intervenini vili bedisregarded, ill the objectis resereticeae kno vn But in retro-
26쪽
spective referen cecine is disserent, viten it is supposed to e
tne predicate being nnecessar o ivno superseded. noDreacti os his mile, vit rogard to tho juxta position sane article an iis predicate, is principali observeo in the a se os propernames. nes t v lines referring o Thoano, mentioned auove intne passage Dona Homer ampl3 confirma and illiistrat Unat is hidnere. l. . 300. γαρ Τρῶες θηκαν Ἀ ναίης ἱέρειαν, and 302. δ' ἄρα πεπλον λουσα Θεαν καλλιπάρηος . . . MIether nean is mentione or no naentioned, ne sense is equali clear. A stercinis snor viei os ne natur os ne article, it DecoIIaes necessa Ty by an application Os,hin nas Deen a id to the explanation os ne mos remarica Die insertions oscit, iis imos remari auteoniissions and cases of insertior an omission omnined, o conside lao v arithe supposed natur of tho artici is ounded ponthe practice, an consor aule to ne usage of tne est Greelcvnters, and of ne sacred pennaen. ut it Irin noti improperi in I si placeri explain a se vis in terans nicti occur in ne
An appellative is a Danae common to evor individua os a ivliolespecies, in contradistinction to a prope nam man, horSe Ac. are appellatives. Assuma Die attributives are lectives, participies, and nouns, significant os cnaracter, relation o digni ty. Mona liciolin indicate person or nings unicii exist sin in oro ne os Whicli only, noui there bo severat, an De ne sublectissciscourse, a tne chimney the veli, the sta Die, ne polier. Anarthrous nouns ἄρθρον, articulus, are notans vhicn nave nottho artici presXed. Λ predicate, in a proposition is nat union is predicate orspolienis sonaething vnich itfel fornis ne subieci: nus, in the proposition Peter is a ran, tan is the predicate, Peter ne su ecl. An instruct noui denotes a in in considered sinapi in iiself, delacnec an separa ted roni any particular illaec in v hic it resides. Duc vilitenescis an austriici noun, ascit Gloes no denoto any ono vhiteis ect Dut that color, o idea in ne general, Mnere-ove found But austractis ouns Ina nave a partwular ac vell
28쪽
worth, is invicaled Thus hucud. H. 59. η νόσος επεκειτο αμα καὶ ὁ πόλεμος i. e. the celebra sed plagite, and the Peloponnesian war. So Acts xxii 5. ὁ ἀρχιερευς μαρτυρε μοι. Ines V. 6. φονεύσατε τον δίκαιον. Acts xviii. 9. την πτείαν, ita da os Expiation the Groatiast on tho 10t os monili isti, called hemas κατ εξοχην. I may bo observe that the postle, He D. XH. 2 suus πέμεινεσταυρον, Ondure a crOSM; Decause the cross, oti vhicli Christ sus-fered, vas notis the time of his susserin pro-enainent inove any Other cross, Whicli the presenc os the articio volita lime implied. On ne sana principio the artici is prefixe to Monadic notans. Illius Demosth de Cor. 53. O με πρυτάνεις τροχουλο εκάλουν εἰς τοΒουλευτηριον' μεις ' εἰς Ἐκκλησίαν πορεύεσθε. o Mati. v. 15.ὐπο τον μόδιον, and ἐπὸ τυ λυχνίαν, only one of vhich vould probablyti found in inea Ouse. rho articio vitii ne sense of a possessιυ pronoun mu Do classed, unde in sanie division Thus Theocae. Idyli sit 52. αλγε τὰν κεφαλάν. o Mati XXusi. 50. ἀφηκε το πνευμα, his Spirit
Us usuali sindolis artici prefixod to ne narnes os in greato iecis of nature. nus Arist. de Coelo, si 4. σχημα δ' ἀνάγκη σφαιροειδες εχειν τον οὐρανόν. o St. JOh in . S. τὸ πνευμα πνεῖ, που
A lectivos in the neuter ender, When invicating sonae attributeor mi alit in iis genera an abstraci idea, have in artici frequenti prefixed. I lius Plato λεγε τι i εἶναι το σιον καὶ το ἀνόσιον. onus τὸ καλόν-τὸ αγαθόν. Socine Apostle Rom. H. I. ευρίσκω αρα τον νόμον - θελοντι μώι ποιέω το καλον, ἔτι μοὶ το κακον παράκειται. ne disseretice is strongi ima Led by the adsenc orpresene oscine article as his usserenco nas been notico by Aristolle bet veen δεδον ἀγαθον suadis ἀγαθόν. ne forme propOsition is true citae latior false. The neuter articio is also prefixexto in infinitivo m00d whicnis tuen sedis an indeclinatile nolin, as nil. i. 21. Mati xiii 3. Hen xi. 5. the του in such cases an siverin to the Liatin ut, and του μη t ne, O ut non, villi the sula: unctives and 1 hess. iii 3. Rona. xiv. 13. and so vit proposition preceding, as δια εις, &c.
29쪽
together recali sonio sana ilia idea. ut nere ure instances unere in article even vitii the ui os iis predicate, oes not caro Dacktne tin to any obieci vitii unicii it a Deen recenti O Dequenti conversant. tris meret ille representative of sonaetning, os unicii, vitetne known or unknown an assuinption is Oie made. I lius in tuis passage of Demosthenes de Corona, πονηρον ὁ συκοφάντης ἀεὶ ave ledri perceive nat συκοφάντης not navin Deen recenti mentioned ὁ συκοφάντης cannot De ne rene ved mention Ostii Same person, ut imust mean everu personis ne description of Vnien συκοφάντης an De asstinaed aud predicated. Andorist. ὁ
30쪽
ἄκρατης επιθυμων με πράττει, προαιρουμενος δε ου Ἐγκρατη δ' ἀνάπαλιν
προαιρουμενος μεν, πιθυμῶν δ' ου.
Tlius Mati xli. 29. του ἰσχυρο is ne nupotnetic se oscine articles as also ὁ γαθος ἄνθρωπος, verse 35. of the sanae napter. So 1 0r vli 28 εὰν γημο η παρθενος, he clio is a virgin, i. e. Virgin generali v. Mati vii. 6. μη δῶτε τὸ γιον τοῖς κυσί onis example illustrates also ne solio ving rules vi κ. nat in the sanaenianne in articio is eniploved plurali to denote vlaole classes and descriptions os person or Dings. Dus Plut de Isid. λεγόμενον του θεους φρουρεὶν, σπερ οἱ κυνες τους ἀνθρώπους. o Mati vi 1. τρο δικαιοσυνν μῶν, ποιεῖν εμπροσθεν τῶν ανθρωπαν. ulcerii. 42. ἀποδεκατουτε το βύοσμον Sonae, noug in ne singular may De considerexas denoting ne genus. Ever insertionis in article nia De referreul to ne os ineseneads. Eitne in articie, Wit iis predicate, denotes a relation,iuameunatet recogni sed D in hearer o eis ineu serve conjointlvio indicate a nypotnesis. omissions of the Article.
In propositionc union meret .rni o denet ex is fence, ille nanaeos the personis ining os unicii existenc is assinnexor dented is xviiliout ne article. O astirm ne existerice sanat, ne existenceos xv nici is at ready assuriae Dyrine articie, vovi De superuli1OUS,ando den it vovi De adsum . nus Escn contra Ctes 26. εσται με εἰργη DemoSin de Cor. 48 ους του προ υμῆς πολεμουπερας. Wo illustrations oscinis mile occur, ulce xxiii. 54. καὶημέρα ν παρασκευη, καὶ σάββατον πέφωσκε. O also Mati xiv. 15.οφίας γενομενης. Νοuns precede hi vertas or participies, substantive O nuncupative, ure BlWaVS inarthrous sucu verus o participies indicating, as hi therio unknown, ne very trutti vhicli the preserice of the articio uould implfio De known or supposed alreudv. hus Dentosin de Or. 23. αἴτιός εἰμι του πολέμου. Esa. X. 6. καὶ καλεῖταιτο νομα αυτου μεγάλης βουλης ἄγγελος, θαυμαστος, σύμβουλος, ἰσχυρος,&c &c. O Mati. i. 16. ὁ λεγόμενος ριστός. xi. 13. ὁ οἶκός μου οἶκος προσευχης κληθησεται. IV sona etinae sit ho vovercinat inopredicate iste εἰμὶ nas the articie, Knere the sulaec is a pri noui personat o denaonstrative, ἐγὼ, b, ουτος, &c. io in Plato,