Philodemus: On methods of inference: a study in ancient empiricism

42쪽

Π που κατ' Ελλους ὁπους εἰσὶν ανθρωποι τοῖς παρ' μῖν δεμοιωμενοι κατὰ τε ἁλλα καὶ κατὰ ὁ νη- τοὶ εἶναι θνητοὶ αν εἴησαν. ol

-τ ούτω ου διοίσει του σημεί-

43쪽

thing like his

u his ex Stoic arguiment is that inductive inferen e is no validuntes it assurnes that the unperceived is like the apparent. The Epicureans ait o recognig the fornaal requirenient of ali ali inferenCe. The Epicurea ans verrio his argu naen is in XVI.4-XVII. 28. λ This ConClusio seenas tot require to Conapiet the nieaning of the passage here Sino lacuna here.

45쪽

an is his is equivalent to the folio ving

46쪽

αυτὴν εμ πεσούμεθα κακίαν .17 24 legi non POSSUnt.

49쪽

of the Sanie genus, o fro1D hos naen nos sinat lar in hodies an soliis to thos of the an e ClasS IV Alanil not therefore, iis the analogica argument:

rnalce the inferenCe . . .

λ The folio vin Stoic argument is again concerned vitii the basis of Analogy. The Completet a like annot be the basis, sin e there is thenidentity, and sigi an signifie are indistinguisliable Partia sinat lamtyi noti Aufiicient basis, a the differenCes present might destro the validi tyos an inferetice. See o v 164 165 170-17 l. An Epicurea 3 nSwer tothis problem ma be found in XXII. 2-28.