Philodemus: On methods of inference: a study in ancient empiricism

81쪽

δ' The Stoic argue that Coniplete enunieration is impossibi an partialentinaeration is inadequate. The Epicurea ans ver i gi ven in XX.3i

83쪽

Since ali nien a re sit nitar o Imen in hir experien Ce Ven in

- This Stoic arguinerit that ei ther identit nor partial sinii larit provides ab sui table haSi for analog is ans vere in XXII. 2-28. δὴ Here the tot argunient is that inferetices iust be analytic t hevit id. Brontius ans ver Salven in XXII. 28 XXIII. 7.βε his Stoic arguiment concerning the peculiarities of the inpercei Vedi Ver ClΟSe to the argunient on unique age and the indefinite extent of variations The Epi Curean ans ver is in XXIII. 7 XXIV. 10. si The argu naen frona unique ages, i Ven preViotist in .l9-ΙI. 25, Sans vered by Bromius in XXIV. 10-XXV. 23. The arguiment fron Variationis ans vered in XXV. 24-XXVΠ.9.

84쪽

λοῖς ὁμογενεσι καὶ ποικίλοις, σ-τ ε της τουτοις περιπτῶσεως καὶ hi πὸ των αυτον ἱστορίας το συνεδρεῖον ὰχωρίστως XXI κὰ στήτων κατὰ μερος λαβbντας, ὰπ τοίτων μεταβαίνειν

τα εἶναι γήρως καὶ νόσου δεκτι-

85쪽

To the Aecon argiannent ave Ahali a that the inferen ce

87쪽

no fron the principi that an objectio privedi ali sinitiari ty

88쪽

της αυτ ης γε ο ινιτη το ς τωνομοίων περ αυτ α συμπτωμάτων,

τίον τω προκειμεν προλήψομαι, καταντήσω ὁ δια τουτων φαινομενων ἐπιλογισ-

πεται το σύμπτωμα, πάντως