The Troades of Euripides;

131쪽

NOTES.

posed toto the samerus ἐν σοί 'inbour Wn ense. CP. 1252. Herm. Oxplains: Vidisti quidem ista, sed nescis te vidisse, neque Iis usus es, quum tamen domi haberes. V ut this version sturA

132쪽

γωματα, ἔκειρέ σε κρατις βόστρυχον ὁ πόλλ' ἐκήπευσε κ.τ. λ.

133쪽

one letter, κεινα Would, o course, have been assimilato ingende to πνοι. p. τροφαί τε ματρις Ευπνά τ' Ομμάτων τέλη, Suppl. 138 μνοι an πινοι have been conjectured for π ι, but ho could such a corruption o accounted ora ere thesens is mos naturat, 'ali, hisses, nil in tosterinicare, ali in fleeples night for thee, nil have come o nought.'For κλῖναι, p. κλισίας, 13 abox e. The late Pros. H. . . Munro Suggested πνοι τε κοινοί, comparing 54, 8 706. ΙΙ89. γράψειεν, observe the wo accusatives, like λέγειν

τινα τι.

134쪽

1207. πρ χειρῶν in frons of them. Rhes. 374 Soph. Ant.1279.

1240. υκ ... πονοι. The readinco the Ss is πλη-οὐμοὶ πονοι Προία τε ... μισουμένη, Whicli Seidier has endoavoured toexplain a follows, nihil igitur actum est in concilio deorum

135쪽

NOTES.

nisi ut ociniolicem redderent et Troiam ante alias urbes odissent, V ioci turn out se on 116l that he gods avo hadiutine concerta, in Woes, and Tro eminenti abhorrodi, thom that thoi ont businos. vas the inflictingit moeson me, and the satingit theiraatred against Troy. Boiore πονοι Some or meanini vindictivel inflictod ' ould botaken ut of μισουμένη. owo 'er, by very light changes, ἐμοὶ an Τροία and μισουμένη Botho explains, io thon thegod have nothinibu wo in stor torio, and the eminentlyhated Troy. In Botho' arrangomenti the verse, ἐμοὶ mouldbe in a stightly unnatura position, ut o more unnaturalthan thes Oxigoneius o metro could wol excuse I feel furetha Botho' emendation hould e accepted, and that hoverso cannotae satisfactorii explaine in the way suggested by eidier. r. Stanto suggesta ob ῆν ρεστὸν θεοῖσι P υκηραρεν θεοι , but Eρα is quit requisite an Bothe' correctiono tho passage is Simpler. ου η εν θεοῖσι α thoiod hau nothin in toro for mo,' lino a very norma expression, but is holpo out by the woll-

136쪽

μενοι, Aesch. et 8 576. κνάπτω is properi to 'card wool, then generali to mangle or notar'; κατέκναψε is ἄπαξ εἰρημένον, ut that is no reason ior rejectiniit There ure severat ἁπαξ εἰρημένα in the Bαcchα alone.

137쪽

NOTES.

139쪽

DESCRIPTION OF THE METRES.

metres in the lay omittin iambic trimeters, Xcept hontho are so mingle with chora metros acto e possibi notreeogni Zed. I ma observe here, that he hora senarius is broadi distinguished iroin the common typo i senarius byiis urity. The chora senarius properi con Sist o pure iambi; e sometimes, however, sinit in chora odes a no puro senarius, ut in hos cases ilio long syllabi is resolvod, and thus is avoldod that sigillines Whicli charactorige thesonarius o dialogue and narration. This planis unusualty abundant in lyrica passages. Wherethes paSSages are not antistrophical, Profer o ach line byit number among the versos o the whol play, adding thesii si and last word of tho vors to provent an DOSSibi confusion In the antistrophic aris I refer o caeli verso accordinito it placo in the strophe, undes isti tho reade tonumber cach lino of the strophe and antistrophe, , , , etc., in his copy. When the strophi and antistrophie ver Se Corre- Sponi exactly Pset downino schom for th two, but ii herois an divergetice, howove Amal or howevor legitimate, Venthe resolutionis a long syllabio Pthen give the schom bothoi the strophi and antistrophie verSe. I have avoided technical seruis a much as possibio Dactylsand trochoes fortia the sinple, ovor chora odo and for his reason I should referri cali a creti a trochai dipodia catalectio, ut that creti is a more inmitia term to SehoolboyS. Tho chora odos are formidabie to junior student A beenuSetho hau boenis overtaid illi technica langvago. ut letthe oachor, inston o lecti irin abolit aeon uni epitriteS,atinc tot his clas that mos choruses ure writton in daci claan trocheos, and that here aro acie Otho norma types With hicli ho an oconio quit familia alter a se days' practice, and oon the tas o detecting the rhythm in

140쪽

With rospectri tho metros of this chorus Soph. ed. R. 150-175), Campboli says i strophe the latet dactylic menSure are ni once interrupte by the moro meditativo iambio rhythm 152-1603, and by a trimeter,ith anueruSis,givinia sortis anapaestio turn. Again, he sponk of iambicand trochaio rhythms, and of intercliange of anapaestio,ith dactyli, in stropho β . Again, in stropho, isi in dactylico anapaesti line, Whilo tho Otho rhythm ars ianthi and trochai α' ut in rogari to stropho ho also alludes to tho union o dactyis and trochos in loga oodi linos.' adhe talion a comprehonsive vie of the metrica character itho wholo odo, he would have givon more decidod prominenceto this ast sentiare, hicli ho ni montion incidontalin hewould have foen that tho wholo character is dactylo-trochaico lognoedic, illi frequent annoruses, iVin nos ni fodactyli lines an anapaesti semblance, ut also to trochaica iambie uir. alie fame eason whicli exist for scanning a Campbell