Latin works

5쪽

DE ENTE PRAEDl CAMENTAL l

7쪽

RIBLIOTHECA PALATIΝAE VIΝDOBOΝENSIS PRAEFECTO ILLUSTRI PER ID LUSTRA PUBLICIS OFFICIIS ME PATRIM BENE MERITO ANIMI GRATISSIMI PIGNVS PUSILLUM

9쪽

INTRODUCTIO N.

The publication of the two philosophica works, Dein lem aedicamentali and Quaestiones XIII, is the fulfilmen o a promis madefive ear ago by the writer, in his editionis De Composicione hominis,to edit sonae more of Wyclis, philosophica works, and thus to mahet his reat master' system of thought et ter no n. egan theseulterior abour in 1886, by copying the Quaestiones for the Wyclis Soci et v but the were interrupte an una voida bl postpone forso me time on account fora vel an vario us other en gagements. At

tength r. Furnivali, hos uni irin activit in ali alter concerning Wycli is so wellanown prevalle drupon me to edit the uestiones XII an a this reati se a no sufflaien to make u a volume another was to e adjo inest it, I hos De Ente Praedicamentali copi e theMS in 1888-i889, and continue preparing the volume o press plo the present time. must ad acie remarks, necessar foris jus appreciatio both of the reatis es them selves and of the present edition a it stand s.

The r si questio regard the ille. The earli est riter, o faras I know, ho mentions his or is Michael Denis, in his Codices Manuscripti theologici Libliothecae Palatinae Vindobonensis. Vindo-b0nae 794, I L I, pari. II page βII. His mention runs thus: d. CCCVI, fol. 9s, p. 2. Absque titulo tractatus De Ente Particulari qui incipit Suppositis ex superius declaratis et declarandis i in poSterum

k ur edition has dicendis, the oni right reaclinio μ'

10쪽

ille Tabulae Codicum, Vol. 2, s. n. 43O7. In Denis notice, it may seem strange that absque titulo is immediatet followed by so preci se descriptio of the ea ding De Ente Particulari. 4 et it oes notfollo that the eadin is of Denis invention It is true that efin no ille pon fol. 9o , here the work egins but at the opss. 93 and 9 rea an abbreviate titie a follows d enteis Atti . This accounts for the eading but the abbreviation has certainlybeen itherio mis read. e can no more read niti a particulari. accordinito the rules of palaeography, than we an den that thecontent of the wor relate to the praedicamenta. I have there fore ad n hesitation in read in De Ente Praedicamentali a the true ille of the work.we se that the margina notes are not without a certa insignifica iace. The have been o use, notis ni a regard the preceding question, ut in determining the right place of the wor in Wyclissphilosophica series A the endis De Compositione Hominis a separate work, as is et known), there illows o f. 58 in re in on the

detatis et more clearly

and o on unti f. 67 , here Tractatus Primus come to an end.

an a note in re in k, evidenti by the fame and says: Explicit