장음표시 사용
11쪽
It is a mos curious ad that notis single great,3 iter in Latinliteratur Was a natiVe Roman. Se m Introd. to the Dial. 99. xiii. f.
12쪽
Ayr. 9, 28 f. Hist. I. 1, lynitatem hostram, a Vespasiano 69-79 i=ὶcohatam, Tito 79-8l auctam, a Domitiano 81-96 longi iis provectam non
See Ann. XI. 11. Plin. N. H. VII. 16, 17 76 speak of Corneli Taciti equitis Romani Belssicae Galliae rationes procurantis. This may et liave been thenistorian A ather. Ch. 45, 4.
13쪽
the natu e iis vaticinium OS eventum, and h. 45, 12, non vidit, etc., it Seems, ould ver appropriatet have followsed immediatolyniter potest . . . esti stisse. The Sence of the epithet init in ch. 3, 13 nee no impi ilia Nerva a stili livin When these ordswere pennest See note ad loc
14쪽
fusust o ooseph auitus' own classifieation of this orti, ou the round that the reatis flagranti violatus orta in allogod ea non os lographica Composition, hiel must, feourse, ither have been unknown to aditus ori liburatolyignored by him. ut When the problem aros O assigningi it a more sui table designation, a gr0at diversit os opinionWas reVealed parti due to an habitual eonfusion illi ho question a to ille purpos of the frontis0. Elimina tingiliis for lio present rom tho discussion a irrelevant, e finit that tho prinoipa obj0otion against ili assumptionthat tho Agricola is a Mostraph resolve themselves into tim.
Ann. III. 24. Hist. I. 1. So the moro delaile discussion of tho questions at issu in Proceed. mer Philol. Assoc., Ol. XXVIII. 1897), p. lviii. f., whore also a iud bibliograph O in controvers mill e found. Portions of this pape have been utiligo in the abovo. Ch. 40 30 Astricola posteritati narratus et traditus.
15쪽
Cp. Plin. Epist. I. 16, 1, petis ut tibi avuncuu me eaeitum scribam,
quo verius tradere posteris possis.
The ars ound eatture in the realises o Hermogenes, Aphthonius, Theon, Oxopater, ut Speciali O Menander' περὶ ἐπιδεικτικῶν eodecte in tho Rhetores Graeciis Wal audii pengel.
16쪽
x INTRODUCTION. II. Biography, accordin to nil ur ancient authorities, ρ- long to the epide icti branuli O literar composition in particula the euconiium, an iis rutes are illustraled asWas natural in Ontieetion illi the biograph o a'ing, the O-callei βασιλικος λογος, the rhetoricians usuali citingas typioni modulf the stili extant Agesilaus i Xenophon auditio uastora o Isocrates. That the Agricol partalles of the oliaraeterii an encomtum a meret eurSOry per u Stat could have confirmed even is Tacitus hau no expressi tot u solitansoli.' In faet, tho in o domarcation etWeen a is
TheSe precept present a Stereotyped SameneSS being iten reproduced verbatim rom earlier anubooks, and the are, ne and ali ulti- matel derive trona realises reachin back of Our sera. The Romana develope no rhetorical system o their Wia, ut egan in themayso Cicero an thereafter illi ver increasin assiduit to copy and tollo the rhetorica canon of the Greelis. For a brie account illi above rhetoricians and thera, se Chri St, Grie chische Literatur-yeschichte , p. 752 ff. That iis essentia features are common to biographica writin ingenera might have been alien or granted even ii Menander Rhet. Graec. III. 369, 2b Sp. IX. 215 . . hadiso expressi confirmo est:
parallelisin to them in the Ayricola, Se belOW. Ch. 3, 31, hic interim liber honori Astricolae . . . deStinatuS. E.g. Doxopater in h. Gr. II. 413 Z. Ουδὸν διοίσει ριλῆς ἱστορίας τ ἐγκομιον, and Sp. Amm. Marcell. XVI. 1, 3 quidquid atitem narrabitur quod non falsitas arstuta concinnat sed de intestra documentis evidentibus fulta ad laudativam paene materiam pertinebit.
17쪽
LITERARY CHARACTER OF THE AGRICOLA. xi
the last in the arrangement of the Others certain prefereneesare expressed, butitherWis considerable latitudo is allo Nud. No rhetoricali tra inest riter Seem to have venture to0mancipat himself rom his traditiona norm excepi in minor delatis; ut in tho an ling of the subjec matter, an author a les hampered his reaiment ein natim rati conditioned by counties consideration inherent in the homo isself, in the cireum statices under hieli heWrote, and in the purpos he had in iem. No a comparison etween these rhetorioa precepi and illustrations and the stricola oveat tho ac that Taeitus,as far a possibio, followed simila modeis.1. Prooeminm oh. 1-3). AS already remarhed, o rigido pr00is rules for the intro luetion to the βασιλικος λογος or an other of the many encomi are a id do vn, ut iustea la large number of suggeStions is enumerate froni vhioli achoice might o made. The prooemium of the stricola isone of exquisite ari nil originality for no Only oes itimpar considerable information o a trieti introductorynature, ut, at the fame time, it sueeeed in iving that peculia perspective in hieli aditus dotabiles defixod his readercto te the stor of this hero.
in ch. 4 f. the resemblane to Menander' illustrationib0ing partieularly strii in g, a faet hieli, of eourse, stoes Otinvalidato the rustworthines of the state1nent them Selves. It is, Oreover, o the identit O arrangement a such
18쪽
υχης αὐτου διεξελθεῖν eli. 4, 18 i. flagrantem animum, etc. εν ψ
ερει την φιλο λάθειαν . . . την περὶ ab μαθηματα σπουδην . . . καν μὲν ἐν λόγοις η καὶ φιλοσοφίμ. . . . o υτ επαινέσεις α ch. 4, 8. 15. 18).
9, 11 3τι σύμβριον ch. 4, 21 . . . επὶ τουτοις εκ των ἐπιτηδευμάτων, ola ποῖον ἐπετηδευσε βέον, φιλισοφον h. 4, 6 . . . τὶ στρατιωτικόν
Menander, IX. 220 III. 372), ακολουθεῖ τοίνυν τοις ἐπιτηδευμασι λοιπον ὁ περὶ των πράξεων λόγος. IX. 223 III. 373 , διαγράψεις δὲ ε ταις πράξεσι ταδε του πολέμου καὶ
19쪽
Stage of his careeris a riter, ho inseris a simila account
ς υσεις καὶ θέσεις χωρέων, ἐν ις οι πόλεμοι καὶ ποταμων ὁ καὶ λιμενων καὶ
δρῶν, etα, an Cic. Orat. 20, 66, ite belΟW. Ch. 10, 1 ff. Ch. 17 19, and Li 's descriptioni Tempe, XLV. 6.
διαιρήσεις πράξεις διχα εἴ τε τὰ κατ' εἰρήν ν καὶ τα κατα πολεμον. Menander. l. . προθαὶσεις τα κατὰ τον πόλεμον, ἐα εν ταυται λαμπρις
Thicis the arrangement fosso est in the stricola io the τὰ ἐν πολέμι biorme the mos glorious perio in his careor. The πράξει ἐν εἰρηνη precedin them eremo a note Worthyrus iliose hichi periormed