장음표시 사용
261쪽
THE RESTORATION O THE EPIKLESIS 22loarnes devotion to primitive truth in the persecuted Chureli in Seotland that finali duci led the formis the Seottish Litu in 764. Bishol Dowden has donet his o uti in his Annotate i Scottis Communion Osce,'
262쪽
Si inner, he wa by no means a Strange to the Scottishusage in the conSeeration of the ueharist. In his stu
263쪽
to introdue it by 0groes into praetiee, Without the Compulsion o Authorit ori thoine Side, o the projudiceo formo Customin the ther. About si monilis uster his return to America, Bishose Senbur received a letter congratulatin him pon his consecration, ironi tho Rev. illium mitti, ut that timo
265쪽
tion in repentin the woriis os InStillation. . . .
266쪽
226 THE CONSECRATION OF THE EUCHARISTCommunion Ossido innot ali oscit, at leas the Consecration
Antiquit the praetice to os that Chureli hos ordi nationes ear tot ni So, ut hos Consecration the
whose incines an assistanc the transcription a made and compared. Contractiones have been Xpand d, ut o alteration has been naucle.
268쪽
but minor importaneo. The clerg os Connecticut be- carne ver Strongi attache to this Communion ossico, an ii as sed even iter the adoption O th AmericanPrayer Book, at eas in Some places, a late 8 1819.
in an error nn error, too on hiel the absurdit os
Vote o the minutes os ou Convention anno 1786, I
269쪽
THE RESTORATION O THE EPIKLESIS 229 bellove so the revision os his matter, I hopo it illbe aken up and that God ill ruis ii Some able and worth advocate so this primitive practice, and mahe ouand the Convention the instrument of restoring it toHis Church in Amorida It would do o more honour in the worid and contribute more to the unionis the Chiarchesthan an Other alterations ou an mahe, and would
owing primarii to the stron influenee o Bisho Soabury. O this hango Bisho Whit sp0aks thus: In the service so the administrationis the communion, it ma perhapSbe expected that therarent change made, in restorin tolli conSecration prayer the oblator mord and the invo dation o fh Hol Spirit, sest ut in in Edward 'sreigia, muS a leaS haVe pro lueed an opposition. Butno uel thin happensed to any onSiderable Xtent, or at eas the author id not est os an in the thorhouSe further han a disposition to the effect in aciewgentiemen, Whicli a counteracted by Some pertinentremark of the resident. In that of the Bishops, it lay
