Hecuba

121쪽

l. 9o3. ἰδία θ' κάστω και πόλει τε does not couple thiis line vitii the preceding, h,ut is correlative to the folio in και bona toeaei man PerSonali and to the cit in generat, ἰδια . . . πόλει eing

122쪽

II HECUBA

Accor En to this iei the analysis of the firs iurines of thie Strophecis a solio us:

123쪽

l. Io Tlae constructio os ἀποκέκαρσαι στεφάναν is simila tolliat os ἀφaιρεῖσθat. ἀποστερεῖσθαι, vects xvlaici in the active talce an accusatiF of the PerSon an Pan accusati V of the hin talcen Way. Viae these vects are in the passive in accusative of the lain is retained, and lae accusative of the person becomes in subqectis ineves in in nominative. Thus detro σ6ρεῖν τινά τι hiecomes ἀποστερεῖσθαί τι. l. I 2. κηλῖδα : cognate accusative viti κατακέχρωσαι. l. I 3. τάλαιV SC. γί): COIn Pare 4 a.

124쪽

116 HECUBA

125쪽

accusati V of person, notis place.

126쪽

118 HECUBA

127쪽

l. Io37. μάλ' αὐθιs: similari μάλ' υ μάλα is osten sed in

128쪽

lines a re uncertain.

130쪽

122 HECUBA

l. IO6. συγγνώσθ' i. e. συ γνωστά in neuter plura is ostenti sed in in predicate viaere a Singula Seem to II more natural 'cit is pardonatae,' C.

ἀνακλαίειν, rivo es to great sor lamentation.'