Orestes of Euripides. Edited with introd., notes and metrical appendix by N. Wedd

발행: 1895년

분량: 271페이지

출처: archive.org

분류: 미분류

191쪽

For ἀρχὰν in apposition, cs. I. A. 8a s. δεξιάν τ' ἐμο)α σύναψον,

dρχὰν μακαρίων νυμφευμάτων.

192쪽

1 8 ORESTES

193쪽

επήξας, in accusative are o os the tirect objeci, hut re instances os a peculta tis of the acc os referen eoo denote in instrument of

Orestes leacis heroo the liearili a thoii glara inalce a supplication; the ἐστί the altaris the hou Se an a suppliant a that pol could

no lightly be disregarded. Se tiae tory in Thucydides of Themistocles a theaearthis the Molossian cing Thuc. I. 36, speciali ilae M oms

194쪽

15 ORESTES

I 5 I. τί συμφορῶ practi catly m ποία συμφορά cs. Hel. I95 ἐν τψ δἐ κεῖσαι συμφορῆς Soph. Antig Iaa ἐν τω συμφορα διεφθάρης SoTro. 8 εἰς αὐτιν κεις συμφορα εἰς την αὐτην συμφοράν.

ἀμυνειν in os purpose, se G. large ed. 77a b. s. Soph. . .

195쪽

NOTES IS I

i 854. ἐγενόμεσθ' ὁ μὲν I. so the cona ponent os a plural xv holei laced in apposition to it in lae Singillar, L Iec. 595 . νθρωποι δ' ἀεὶ l ὁ ἐν πονηρο οὐθἐν ἄλλο πλην κακός, ὁ δ' ἐσθλος ἐσθλός.

196쪽

15 ORESTES

For in hacchanais' treatnient of animal S, cf. Bacch. 737- 7. Thelut constriaction uout be δραμόντε ξυναρπασάν νιν οἱ βάκχαι ξυναρπά

I 93- . ἔτεινον has the sui conative force of in imperfeci: sought to ove Helen vero stati glate V so L. and . . Schaeser PrOPOSes ἔπι comparin Hec. 263 ἐς τήνδ' Ἀχιλλεύς

καινον contain the idea Devi as vellis o novelty CL Tro. II i f. κωνα καινῶν μεταβά λουσαι χθονὶ συντυχίαι. I 5o6. For the combination o constriictions cs. 369 ξίφο ἐκ θανάτου πέφευ γα. I 5o8. -8ε This scene is no Iai in Ilium ci cs Cycl. 63, hereste choriis of satyr in the vitas of Sicil say, οὐ τάδε Βρόμιος ob τάδε χοροὶ cf. b. et o , he Cyclops telis them, οὐ Διονυσος τάδε. Similarly Andr. 68 Hermione to the captive Andromache γνωνα θ' is εἶ γης. οὐ γάρ ἐσθ' Eκτωρ τάδε, οὐ Πρίαμος, οὐδε χρυσός. Tro. -- ουκέτι Tροία τάδε καὶ βασιλεῖς ἐσμἐν Τροίας. I 5o9. Whereve it be i .e in Ilium o Argos lis is sweeter handeat in the yes of the wise. V The man ' terror spur his intellectand throughout he get the thes oscit in the dialogiae: ut his vit, thiis qui chened by terror, ni malim hin the more despicabie. I 5 Io. μι που used in question when the petilier destres butdoes no necessarii expecto negative ansu er CL Hel. 5 I ci, et is Ουτον os τί που κρυπτεύομαι Πρωτέως ἀσέπτου παιδὸς ἐκ βουλευμάτων; ld. 95, 475. Ion III 3. Stirlitari γ' o που e. g. Hel. 35 ο πού νιν Ἐλένης αἰσχρδν λεσεν κλέος. and Οὐ δήπου; .g. r. an. 526. The naturat wayrio talce this line is to regar Μενελέω a govermed by κmi γγ ἔθηκας, Thou dicis no sit rei rais a. holitrio Menelaus ohelpῖ ' aut the Phryga a repties a though Orestes lia naeant, Thou

197쪽

κραυγὴ ἐθ. τίθημι and τίθεμαι arre osten thus used vitii a substanti veto Orm a Periphrasti verti: cs. Soph. Trach. 996 ι αν μ' ἄρ' ἔθου λίβαν. I 5 II. μὲν ουν, na raster': s. 52 I. may, it vas that they

198쪽

i54 ORESTES.

Bacch. 7 8 I. T. 359 For in Gorgon, Se Plioen. 55 . Alc. III 8.

199쪽

the Epic iis os es xx ith the suffiinctive tiae Tragedians seem occasion- allyo have employed his Epic iis e in ortae to indicate a more rena ote contingen cy than that indica ted by the suture or present indicative. So here, Orestes, vishing to ut ille possit)dit os Menelatis' resus iniheli in a rentote a light a possit, te, uses the sub)unctive Ivlii leso the les undestrahite contingen cy os lais bringing the Argives herases the Ordinan inclicative. The sanae explanation vili appi is xv read σώση θανεῖν. orithe instances in Trag. se Aesch. Euna. 23 εἰ προδῶ σφ'

εκίν Apollo is allud in to the possibilit os his voluntarii the trayins OresteS, an L xi She to eui phas is the ni protiabili tyos sti clara hypothesis . So Soph. . . I 3 δυστάλαινά τἄρ ἐγo, et σου στερηθῶ Antigone os the possit, te ossis her throtii er). In Sopia Antig. Io κεἴ τις -οφos, Hae inoia i arguin against the existenc os σοφία insallit,ilii LV stichas inat whichiis ather feeniecta arrogate odii in seis, and the resore States the hypothesis that si icti an in sal lihil person exist in ille mos tintile elysorin possibi e This explanation seenis gerierali to hold good os the instatices that occur in dialogite: t, ut in lyrical passages the dioin

Seenas hi Sed rati aer a an arcthaismola an to conve a subile distere iace osthought See Soph. O. T. 87 .

i536. ὀυo the insertion os the numera has a pictorial essecl. giving greater definitenes to the de Scription cs. Alc. et 5 ὁρῆ σἐ κἁμέ.

200쪽

156 ORESTES

I 562. ἀλλα, at erat V as osten, e .g. I. A. 23 ιν ὰλλα oῖτο κατθανουσ' ἔχω σέθεν μνημεῖον, Ion 26, 978 Hec. 39I, thoen. 618. 156 . ἐμὴν viae one or more adjectives villa the retici precedea ut Stanti Ve, noster epithe nia solio v the substantive Mithout be- Comin predicative, even though in article is no repeate hie recit. Many, ut by no means , o ines cases a be explaine on thera ound that in a. . in question coalesces villa the substantive o sotinone idea as here δάμαρτ' ἐμην is res arde asine Vord. CL Hel. 2 39 τ ι κατθανοντα πόσιν ἐμον θάψαι θέλω.

ξυνθανεῖν του διολέσαντας init the antecedent ἐμὴ χερὶ is attracte into the relative clause, produc inditiae figure of speeclara nou as hyperbaton sor laicia, se on 6 in Eoi the antecedent inserie in the relative clause, CL I s. II 8 , 165 s. v μην ξυνάορ. his tautologica repetitionis δάμαρτ' ἐμην here ἐκείνην vould be nougia a due to the factoliat, as usual Menelaiis' clites thoiight is sor his vise . tot apti compares Med. 78 ff. παῖδας ὁ μεῖ- τους μου αἰτήσομαι οὐχ se λιπουσα πολεμίας ἐπὶ χθον os

SEARCH

MENU NAVIGATION