장음표시 사용
161쪽
νίγματι τότε πρόσωπον Mos προσωπον.
strivo uter His lisonem noW: Μati. v. 8; Gal. v. 5, ἐλπίδα δικαιοσυνης ἀπεκδεχόμεθα Bu emptoring uio univorsia sorin os
ἐπί Rom. xv. Ia; I Tun. iv. Io in thatos tho onjοynient Ospossession. ComP. i. 3 note κοινωνίαν εχειH. νίζει εαυτόνJ puri th hinnarilin Personat estori is necessarily calleci out by a definite object os personal dev tion. The boliovosa act is the using vliat God gives. SO Augustine Iuritos: Quia nos castificat nisi Deus t Sed Deus te nolentem non castificat. ΕΙ quod ada ungis voluntatem tuam Deo castificas teipsum. Caatificas te non
de te sed do illo qui venit ut liaritot in te. Tamen quia agis ibi aliquid voluntate ideo et tibi aliquid tributum
162쪽
and καθαρός a state. Ἀγνεία eon ER Mtho result os an in vard efforet, καθω
glorifiod stato. For the change os
goen in relation to sin and rightoous-nosa. Sin is in ita nature uTeconcilω
163쪽
It is intor ting to notico that Bede observos tho inadoquacy of tho Latinrendering : Virtus hiuus sententiae, ho inys, facilius in lingua Ora oram,
min edita est epistola,comprehenditur, siquidem apud eos zntinuitaε ανομία VOeatur. . . Omnes enim qui peccant praevaricationis Ρα exix. II9 Lat.
rei sunt, hoc est non solum illi qui datam sibi scriptae legis scientiam contemnunt, sod et illi mii innocentiam legis naturidis quam in protoplasto
omnes a opimus sive infimitate sive ne entia sive etiam ignorantia com
164쪽
ανομία. 4 καὶ οἴδατε oτι ἐκεῖνος ἐφανερώθη ἴνα τας μαρτίας αρη, καὶ αμαρτία ἐν αὐτω οὐκ εστιν. ' πας
ion in iis suinosa. For ἰκῶνος Me c. s. 6 noto. It vili ho obseruod that in
not ouraim in ordor in include tho subnem os ino treth expressed in c. ii. a. For tho plural used absolute. Me
otomia charactor os the Redeomeri
165쪽
express the omenco of tho Christian
maantum in eo manet in tantum non
ino internat spiritual character.
tho question os tho indosectibility os
166쪽
ἐαρακεν αυτον Ουδε εγνωκεν αυτόν. ' τεκνία, μηδεὶς
πλανάτω ὐμῶν δ ποιων την δικαιοσύνην δίκαιός ἐστιν,
The exact phraso is disserent in
Mν δικαιοσυν H: in v. Io δικαιοσυν'eXPresses any particular manifestation
IS; XV. Ia; xvii. I 4. Augustino Iulioni Bodo transcribos renaarha on this comparimn botvroontho righteolisnosa of tho bellovor and tho rightoo nem os Christ Me v. a): Videtis quia non semper rima ad parilitatem et aequalitatem refertur. . . Habemus et nos imaginoin Dei, sed
non illam Θam habet Filius aequalis
167쪽
του διαβόλου εστίν, ὁτι ἀπ αρχης δ διάβολος αμαρτάνει. εις τουτο ἐφανερώθη δ υιὸς του θεου ἴνα λυσν
John traces it bach yet furthor in aspirituat origin. Augustine remarha that tho dovilis not tristed in Scripturo as ille author os any boitig : Nominem socii diabolus, neminem genuit, neminen creavit. Sed quicunque fuerit imitatus diabolum quasi do illo natus sit filius diaboli insitando non proprie nascendo. In this connexion it is r inarkablo that origon, vilisse ho di tinctly notices that in relation to thedovit St John sua εστίν εκ and notγεγεννηται εκ γων μένος ἐστὶν ἐκ in xx. 3 I3, iv. 3as , elae rhere invescae του διαβόλου γεγέννται γεγέννοται man. ix. in aer. 3 4, ui. I 8i; ML inam. xii. Io, in. 29o; Hom. vi. in
αμαρτάνειJ rin eth. See v. 6 note. His sinsul action is continuo and present: sula unxit vectum praesentis temporis quia ex quo ab initio coepit tiabolus mecare nun*Iam desiiι
168쪽
τα εργα του διαβόλου. ' πας δ γεγεννημένος ἐκ του
os tho Christimi lila: οἶς ὁ βίος ως
Christiana sor Whom tho conception
169쪽
μένει, και οὐ δυναται ἁμαρτάνειν, ὁτι ἐκ του θεοὐ γεγέννηται. ''εν τουτω φανερά ἐστιν τα τέκνα του θεοὐ και τα τέκνα του διαβόλου πας δ μη ποιων
The absenoe of tho Meticlo σπέρμα nοι - σπέρμ) duracta attontion tollio charactor of the divino principio and not to tho divino principio communicatod in tho particular case. Sse
natus est ex Deo, et quo non admisso solvuntur cetera, quo innumO eonfirmantur eotera. Quod est hoc peccatum l Facero contra mandatum Christi, contra testamentum novum
Jolin xiii. 34, Tho Oxplanation is
170쪽
δικαιοσύνην οὐκ εστιν εκ του λου, και ὀ μη αγαπῶντον ἀδελφον αυτου. ' οτι αυτη εστιν η ἀγγελία ην
othor hand tho absenco of tho aruolo in tho solio ring placoa is significant: in ii. I 8 εσχατ' ἄρα, v. 9 σπερμο-
not his brother. Comp. ii. IO noto. This clauso is not a mere Oxplanation
Augustine sus in strihing Wordavrhich vero adoptod by Bede: Quidquid vis habe; hoc solum scaritatemJ non habeas: nihil tibi prodest. Alia si non habeas hoc tabo, et implosti
legem. II, I 2. The revelation os characteris tracod bach to tho typo inven intho portrai ture of tho fit si fulsinientos man ideat in tho G pel, and Ostho fimi sin after tho Fall.