The consecration of the eucharist : a study of the prayer of consecration in the communion office from the point of view of the alterations and amendments established therein by the revisers of 1789

181쪽

ma be ne cord in to the phraseolog os ach particular par of the anon here the Sign are made. e notealso in his ordo the o bow, upon the par os the olebrant, ut helegi nning of the Invocation, and tho istinguimo the element ut the losin do Xology, as in Ordo 'Amalarius ' Ν5s . . D.),who ad 0foro im an Ordocloset ut in to the prece ling, complete ou knowledgeo the eremonia that was sed in the in th centur inconnection illi ho Canon Missae. In his Ecloque onthe Ostiee o the Mass loarn, in addition to lint eat ready know that tho colobrant bowed down at the wordes Phis oblation heresore Hanc igitur); and ut so that noui the opsening of tho Invocation whieli ho Sald bowin pro-ioundi uni remaining bowed untii tho ord Phat asmany o us the celebrant prayed privat et ut discretion.'

183쪽

THE ROMAM CANON MISSAE 43 in tho interprotation os thoianon Missae is to bo ound in tho picturus illi hiuli the limiter illustratod the

Curion in a ueramentur os the tentii centur once preservet ut the monastor os . Elnis in the Black orest. one o these represent the celebrant Standin erect and mali in the Sigris of the eros in the preliminar Invocation Quam oblationem J The seconi portrny the celebrant bowing o for the Invocation proper Supplices te). The thiri illustration is ivon to the 'nus Dei, beiore the priosi' communion. Thus his artis os thetentii centurv in piet in Out hoSe partes of the anon Missae to illustrate, hieli,ere in his a considerodii

Cf. Doliste, Memoire fur 'Anciens Sacramentatres, P. 192.

Gurberi, Monumenta Veteris Liturgiae Alemannicae, typi San- Blasianis, 1777 Vol. I. P. 234. Ibid. p. 235. Ibid. p. 237. Astor the lato thoor os consecration by the recitationis our Lord's orcis in the Narrativo o Institutionia come in , orandilio elevationis thoios nitor Hoc est enim corpus meum ChoSenis the most important acino illustrate. The ancient understandingrandimportaneo of tho Supplices te a stillis Strongi soli hon his manuscript wa writton that thoclinarior, nocting tho bolienos his time, ut unconseiousi lius tosti hin a itness, no lighil totoga insuid, of tho ac that Rome was then ut one illi the rost of tho Catholio Chureli in hor Eueharistic Prayer. Tho stud of tho growth of the rubrios in tho Cano Missae, especiali in tho Narrative os Institution, A it110ssed by tho ISS., assord Strong corroborative teStimon to this saet. Is ona ili ak th troubla to ex in the MSS. containocli an fair-sigo collection, he will a sei ropaid. Notini tho varioty in tho rubrios sis ther aro any), hut also the dotalis os the Scribes Work, sho plaint tho thoological atmosphoro in hich

184쪽

cumand of the Signis the orOS made ver eae li Separatolyin tho Narrative o Institution, whicli mimeti gestures Wo knowno have been in se, rom Amalarius' own testimony, in the ninth century. The reason is no far tos00k; tho Narrativo o Institution a but the proludo, and ad n direet earing as effecting, ipso facto, theconsecration o tho Eucharistic elemonis. The rationale and aceompanyin ceremonia of tho Cano Missae at the period unde consideration e findiora parallo with that of tho Otho Liturgies o Christon-dom. The consueration os the Eucharist a regardo i

185쪽

os Consperation os the Roman Chureli dissors 110ithor in potntis textua expression nor in eremonial, froni that illi Easterii Churches. ' i

186쪽

146 THE CONSECRATION O THE EUCHARIST

monia pravis in the welith and thirtoenth centurios Thomatorialistic thoolog o Paseliasius and his followors triumphod ver the olde and more primitivo bello ofliis oppononis, and this carriod long illi it tho noweoniusion o thought in rogari to the consecration illi Eucharist into a laee o dominanee throughout Westori Christendom. The developinent of th doetrineos transubstantiation and of the notion that th Eueharistis onSeerated by the recitat o Christ 's ord os declara tioni administration toti Apostles en on ogether, tho latior influonesed by the ignorando of the athors that prevallud and by the solation of the wo reat divisionso Christendom ironi aeli ther.'

187쪽

THE ROMA CANON MISSAE 4TIn ookin into Paschasius' truatis On the Bod and Blood o the Lord, e fini stron evidone os tho hold os the old tradition of the Chureli upon him, longeside os the geritis of the revolutionary theor that Wa to Supplant

189쪽

Supplices te a tho mos important saetor in thoianon Missae. In Chap. V., howevor, se in i h foundationo tho thoory whiel in the nox two hundred ear sitiited tho contrem gravit of thes non Missae to the recitationo th Narrativo o Institution Stari in ironi the eon cepi that the ueharist is consperat sed through Christ 'scommandS, e passe to the notion, Without apparent lyrealiginguli transition. that Christ respou k His ord in the Qui pridie and that ut the res of the anon is, relatiVely unimportant. In his agernes to asser the absoluto materia idontityi th gist hieli ho ommunieant redolvos illi that hieli Christinave tomis apostleS, Paseliasius tendes to vertook thos elour distinet tons hieli had 0rotosor rogulat sed tho Chureli ' Eucharistio

190쪽

atmoAphere, oin bach to S. Isidore o Sevili sor his inspiration, nil oldin ius to the old traditions of tho