장음표시 사용
31쪽
certain ly hori soli book to e later thara 988 the ea os thes aint' decease. I main potn to a cla te aster O33, the ea in whicli the observance of the festiva is sal to have been enjoined by the law of Canute. But it is mos likel that the satiat was
Commemoraled, Speciali in monasti Churches, with in a Veryse years rom the time of his eat h. Aga in the presen C in the Proprimu or ather in the addition to the PropriIDII Containe in the leaves hicli precede the Kalendar of two maSSOSO S. Edward, and the importance given in the Kalenda to thesestiva of his martyrdom a probab ly indicate a date later than IOO8, in hicli ea the witan' decreed the observance of his festiva on March 8 throughout England .'On the ther hanesit suo be note that ei ther the Proprieturanor the Kalendar Contains an mention O S. Alphege, and that while the dates of the deat lis of K in Edgar an hi son S.
Se Thorpe, Ancient Lais an Institutes of Eng lanae, Ol. i. P. 37O, 37 I. The date of O33 is that assigne by illi in s. Contalia a nae 3sanniae et Hiberniae, vol. i. p. 299. The festiva is no mari e in the Kalendar of the Jumleges S. The da is mari exin the Kalenda by gold uncia letters an ornament hicli,
Soriar as a distinctio can heirawn probabi indicates that the festiva wa regarde da one of high rank. Even alio in sor the honour hicli might be gi ven to a royalsaint, his ould hardi have been the case hile the veneratio of the aint a Stili, Sorio Say, tentative an locat. Se Thorpe, Ancient Lam an Institutes of En laud, Ol. i. P. O8, 3O9. This decision of the Mitan V is reliearsed, o re-enacted in the La o Canuteali eady referre to.
32쪽
irce as an indication os date, is the omission os the nam ofS. Alphege. He ad been Bisho os inchester e re laebecam Archbishop, and we might there re expectrio in him
commemorate at in Chester earlier than in os locali lics. His sanctit Seem to have been recognised illiin a very law
years rom his eath in IOI 2, hil his remalias stili lay in London an after his translation in O23 Some mention of his nam might be Confidenti expecte in an Kalenda belongingto the outh o England an not eas in a inchester manu
Ethel re an Edmund Ironside for it earlier limit in thes ac that the mention os . Florentinus, in the Litan proin mis, is mos easti accounte for is, regar the manu scriptos avin been writte in or after the ear IOI3. Thispoint,il be discusse further in considering the Videnc a tolocality, whicli is the neX Subjecti Our en uiry. THE PLACE HERE THE MANUSCRIPT WAS RITTEN. For determining the place at hicli the manuscript was written e find in the book itfel evidence of two incis. The illuminations illi hicli it is adorne are os a peculia type, whicli is Quia in a mali number of Englisti manuscriptS, andis belleve to mari the work of what is calle the inchester School. It would e possibie, o the evidenCe of the illumina
tion alone, O SSign the manuscript illi Some Confiden eoo One of the in great monasteries of inchester, an to decide
Kalendar Ethelred οὐ S. George' day, Edmund οὐ S. Andrew' day, in Io I 6. There is however in acti case sussicient pace or a note of the obit, i the scribe had chosen to ad suci a note in the Kalendar.
33쪽
that it was ritiei et ther at the old inster, commoni called S. withun's, o in the Newm inster Sometimes calle S. Peter'S. The late Prosessor estwood in his account of the book while recognising the inseriorit of the illumination to thos of the Benedictional of S. Ethelisold, is et o opinion that the womanuscript Procee froin the fame laC and were Xecute atabout the Samo time. He assigns them both to the NewMinster M. Andre Potiter, ora the ther and is of opinionthat the stud of the Kalendar an Propriuva of the manuscriptlead to the conclusion that it was ritten in the old inster of Winchester, and was intende sor se in the monaster of Ely. For the lalter part of this Conclusion M. Potiter feem to et Onthe preseracem certain ames no in the Kalendar o Sanctorale, but in the anon of themas an in the Litanypro infirmis. On these potnt Something ill e sali hereas ter but illi regar to the place here the manuscript was ritien, it illperhap appea that the eviden Ce of the Kalendar and the Propriu=u Sanctorum, hil distincti indicatin that the bookis to e connected illi inchester, potnis o the whole to the New rather han to the old inster a the place of it origin. M. Potiter cloes no state in delai the ground whicli te hin toassign it to S. withun' : ut sonae of them ma readii beconjectured. The mos ObVious ground Such a lex appearto e somewhat wealiene by Considerations hicli are Ot,perhaps, Vident a firS Sight and there are alSO Ome OintSwhich seem to e in favour os a disserent conclusion, hicli it isno unlikely that he est ut of ACCOunt. I we digregard as O may sor Our Pi CSOnt UrPOSe thOSCcommemorations of Saint whicli haVe a place in a large numberos ester mass-book bes Ore the ClOS O the tentii Centvry, and were probabi s und in the great majorit os Englisti booksbe re the date of thecium leges S., and also those hichthough es widely Sprea were et o common a to amor no
34쪽
rea testis locali ty, e hal find that, illi ver sexu Xception S, the a me of saint supplied by the Kalendar and the Propriunt Sanctorum os ou MS may be divide sint two groups One os these consist os ames elongin to En gland the ther os nam es Connected illi a district includin the orthis France, the Marchis filanders, an parti Lowc Lotharingi a With in Cach of these rotaps, again, e may n eviden C Os a moro precis hi nil in the prominence gi ven to certa in nam CS, Cithe by the ornamentation iven to them in the Kalendar, o by the PrCSCnce of prope masse in the e X t. e mayirs tali thosaint of the Englisti roup, mari in ivitii an asteri si thos e Stivat whicli appea in the Kalendar and with an obelias 'thos for hicli the book provides specia masses. The ex tille Spritate in tali type indicate that the masses are t be OUnd, no in the od of the book biit in the leaves at the egi nning of the Voltim C.
Variou paris os England are represente in his list, but the Promine iace of those specialty connected illi inchester is Clearly mari ed. Three estival os . withun re noted two Os
This ento in the Kalendar has been erased Eadmundi' was ei possibi a clerica error for U Ead wardi. V Two masses of S. Edward are given, ut no date is attache to ither of them. erasure has est the date possibi doubisul See P. ZIO, Ole.
35쪽
S. Birinus, w of S. Ethelwold. e might Ypec that somenote os the festivat o T. Swithun ould appea in a in chester Kalendar, Veia though it e re no that os the old instor: and ence the number of these en tries, perhaps, is es t be considere than the relative prominen Ce iven to the festival S.
Non of them is speciali mari ed by gol letters in the Kalendar this distinction, incleed, salven to ex of the Englislisainis ut had the book been writtera in . Swithun' Minsterhe would uret have received rom the scribe Ome hare offuch honour AS it is, there is nothin in the Kalendar o indicate that any one of the three festival of S. withun was ofhigh rank, hil only one of them has a prope mas in the Sanctorale. The Case is the fame illi the wo estival of S. Birinus Thus, at in the Kalendar and the Propriuiutogether, e find that the promine race given to these two a intS, especiali venerate in the old inster, is es than e mightiook or in a manu script written in that holis c. The are incleed distinguished, butio more than e might natural ly X pec in book writte in any of the monasteries in inchester. On theother and we find that the Propriu=ri proVide a Proper ASSsor ach of the two festival of S. Ethelwold, o hom the moni Sof the Newm inster o wed an specia reverence: hile e findalso in the Kalendar, though no in the Profriunt, the mention
Severa os them appear in the Kalendar and ones festiva of
S. Edward S. Augustine S. Cui liber are entere in gold uncials S. Etheldi eda June 23 and S. Ethelwold Aug. I in old rustic capitals S. Tibi, in clominuscules. The las distinctio is probabi due to the fac that the en tr sollowsclosely on the Chrisimas grouinos festivais, and S. Ethel old appear in the fame linean sciipi as S. Peter ad in Illa. Aster the remova o Newm inster o Hyde in O S. Grimbald appearsio have been regarde asine of iis principat patrons : ut it is quite possibi that his
36쪽
S. Etheld reda is mari e there by gol letters an in the Sanctorale by a prope mass. ut his is perhaps sufficiently accounte sor, is no by the honour in hicli S. Etheld reda vas commoni held. by the ac that S. Ethelwold, ho may be
calle the secon Munder of the Newm inster, as intimatelyconcerne in the assair of Ely. There is some reason to thini that a specia bon o confraternit eκ iste no oni belween New inster an iis parent house of Abingdon, but also belween New inster and Ely. O the appearance of S. Etheldreda's nam in the anon of the Mass, to hicli M. Pottier alis attention it,il be more Convenient to spealia a later Stage. It has been sal that in the later, o locat, portio O the Kalendar ani Proprium the mos important par of ha maybe calle the foretgn element Consist o commemoration Offaint.belongin to the countries hicli te round the March of Flanders. his is liat e might naturali eXpec in amanuscript writte in the solithi England during the Oth orearly par of the Oth century. The mos obvious Ource forimportations is ne may Se the term was Clearly to e Mundin these regions, illi,hicli here a frequent Communication.
and where the language commoni in se dissere but littiesrom the Englisti longiae. Probabi many of the festival of the aints of this regio had Mund their a in to the Kalendarsos Englisti churches e re the time hen Alsred encourage orinvite distinguishe cleriis Doma lander and the eighbouringterritorie to Cros the ea to England an to setile in his kingdom. ut the Veneration os the loca saint of this foreigia region a no doub advance by the influence of these oreignecclesiastiCs and it a b the cases that in the Kalendar and Proprium of the book we are Considering there rem Ain Ometraces of the influence of S. Grimbald who was himself of their
In the ollowin iis of the more notabie festivat o non
Her festiva is marked in the Kalendar of the Sacramentat of Amiens in theninth century See Deliste, Mem. Sur 'Anciens Sacramentatres, P. 333. The Register of New inster contains lisis of the abbois and rethren f
37쪽
Kalendar of the Bodleian S. Digby 63 D); in the Litany containe in the original, o Lotharingi an portion of the Leo fric lissat L 1 an in the Kalendar of the Leo Di Missat writtenabout 07 in England L ). The Digby S. 63; hicli is
assigne to the micidie of the th century, was ritten by apri est of inchester. It Kalendar is there re of specialimportanc so thi Com PariSON.
Some ther festival seldom Mund, ut hardi avallabi as eviden ce of locality, may be mentioned here There is a mas for the festiva o S. Basil, ithout date, but probabi potntingo a se stiva o Jan. I. In the Kalendar, S. Christin is mentione o Jul I an on Oct. 5 two entries hicli are represente also in theearly inchester Kalendar of S. Digby 63. S. Benedici PPear o Dec. , where e find a festiva of the fame aint mentione in the ather later Winchester Kalendar containe in the Cottonian SS. Vitellius . viii an Titus D. xxvii. the lalter of hich seem to proceed rom the e Minster. The Depositio of S. withun has been adde to the Kalendar of the S. Dalater han&; ence the Kalendar a probabi written illii a Vei se years of 863, is notie re that date. I may be considere that it is certaint earlier than the date of the Dundatio of the Newm inster. S. Radegund was also connected illi Noyon, havin received consecratio homS. Medard. Samson probabi owes his place in the Xeter Kalendar o his Ce hic nationalit he appears in the ninth centui Kalendar of Amiens Se Deliste, Mena. siιr 'Ancisa SacravrentatreS. P. 336. β his festiva coincides illi that o S. Bartholome , hicii the Jumleges S. place On Aug. 25.
38쪽
Accordin to this lis the rota of Ore isti satiat i represente in the una leges S. y eighteen or i S. Amandus noct. 26 is distinc from S. Amandus On Feb. 6 by ineleennames, and by twenty-One feSti Uals of the eighteen ames the Lotharingi an Litan of the Leo Dic Missa contain alliut three. The Kalendar of the Leosric Missat, hicli a be alien tore present the Sage of EXeter et cera i and OOO, includesten of the eighteen ameS, an a many of the wenty-Ones stivals On the ther and we See that in the th century, bes ore the influence of Alsred ' introductio an promotion offoreign cleriis ad made iis et feli, the loca Kalendar os incheSter, as repreSented by the Digby S. already include it etve ut of the wenty-one festiUals hicli represent the reigia element in the una lege book. The additions in faci, hi Ch have been made to the ames include in the older inchester Kalendar are o more numerou than e might OaSonabi e Xpec them to e is emeret Conside the interva of time belween the probabie dates of the Digby and thecium lege manu Scripis. ut it is orthwhil to notice a se I Oinis hicli on the hypothesis that the Jum leges S. a written in the Newm inster may be thoughtto have so me Connection illi the addition Os particular ames The nam o S. Judoc there an e litile oubi, was introducedin conseque iace of the fac that in the ear o 3 the relics of the satiat were broughto England by refugees rom Ponthieu, and found a resting-place in the erum inster. The lisis o relics
Theseisaints are in the Jumleges S commemorate in the fame maSs illi S. Remigius and GermanUS. 2 his gain is probabi identicat illi S. Amandus o Maestriclit, the Dunder of S. Amand ear Arras. The Litany of the Leosti Missa has the nam os S. Amandus, like that O S. Vedast, ni once. Liber Monaste; ii p. 82. The alendar o Titus o xxvii. ana
39쪽
posses sed by New inster hicli appea in the egister os the
n ames appea in the Kalendar of thecium leges S. ut areabsent sto in the older in Chester Kalendar. The mention os S. Bavo, the patron O Ghent, On CL I, together illi S. Remigius, Germanus an Vedast, i probabi rare in Englislibooks. I seem no altogether impossibi that iis introductionma be connected illi the fac that omar, abbot of hent appears to have been or a time a ViSitor, Or even an inmato, Ofth Newm instor. The prope masses for festival belongin to this groupwhicli appea in the auctorale are is, include the mas in whicli S. Vedas and avo re Commemora ted on Oct. I sive in number. The mas for Oct. I ali sor no specia notice. The ther Mur a re hos o S. Genoveta Jan. 3 S. Vedast
that in the old Paris Missal, and the masse of S. Vedast S. Ouen, and . me appensi rom internat Viden ce, to have beentaken, at secon harad, it a be but ithout change, Dona theloca mass-book of the distri Cis to hicli the aint.belonged. The mas of S. Ouen, Xcept the preface, has ound iis a into
Vitellius E. xviii. mar Jan. 9 as the da of the Translation o S. Judoc a sestivalwhicli is no note in the Kalendar of thecium leges M, Possibi this translationina have been to a ne stirine in the church of the Newm inster, and of a date laterthan that of the Jumleges S. See p. 47-33, 58-63 of the Register. S. Genovela, S. Radegund, and S. Leuthhed. The list also include relic os three of the aints of this group ho have a place in the Kalendar of the Digby S., S. Vedast S. Bertin and S. Firmin. The alendar of the S. ni mentions S. Remigius an Germanus Thenames of S. Vedas and avo appea in the headin and prayers of the mas for theda in the Proprium Sanctorum se P. I infra. 3 His nam appears, illi a note of Some tength, in the Register of Newm inster, at the ea os a lis of thos qui se speciatiter evoveretιnt. RegiSter, p. 24. The editor of the Register Seem to thin that oma remaine at New inster ill his death. S. Amandus, hos nam is Oined with that o S. Vedas in the Kalendar, is no mentione in the Proprium at all. There is also a discrepanc belween the Kalendar and the oprium illi regar to S. Omer. The Kalendarint nottas oneo his festivais, June 7 for hich the Propriasu a no masS. S. Ouen Oes notappea in the Kalendarint all.
40쪽
the Missalsis arum Vork, and Hereford But in these books
the mas of S. Augustine os Canterbury. The differ oni in the substitutio of the nam of the apostle fine region so thato the apostle of another. There is a light incongruit in theiruse in Englanx the betondit Arras an to Therouanne a themas of S. Augustine belong to England At liat time theywere importe there is no means of knowing the may have been introduce at an time e re the manu script wa writtem: biit it is perhaps natural to thini that the are more likel toliave been introduce to an Englisti monaster by one comingsrom the districi here the had their origina an propersignificance than to have been adopte by an Englisti communit proprio motu, an to se in them a trace of S. Grimbald ' connection illi Flander on the ne han and Nere
It has been atready said that . Pottier, in suppor of his
vlew that the manuscript was intende sor se in the monasteryos Ely lay Stres on the presenc in the Canon of themas and in the Litan of the names os Certain aints of Ely. The nam esare hos of S. Etheld reda SeXburga, Wilburga, and Eormen-hild. S. Etheld reda is mentione in the anon together illi S. Gertrude, in the laus Nobis quoque peccatoribuS and the Mur are involae among Virgin sainis, in the Litany. M. Potiter spealis of them a therars Mur abbesses of in but the caseis no quite a he SuppoSed S. Wilburga the sister of S.
At ouen, S. Ouen ould naturali be calle fatronus noster a Vor and Hereford the word patroni rostri are change to atroni sui i. e. fidelis populi),while the Sarum Missa substitute confessoris tui atque sontiscis. These three prayers mali up the mas of S. Omer That o S. Vedas has preface, an has subjoine to it an oratio ad vespertina, hicli a b take loindicate that the festiva was ne of high rank. All ou names, as e have Seen, occur in the Kalendar of the S.