Aristotelous peri geneseos kai phthoras. Aristotle on coming-to-be & passing-away (De generatione et corruptione) A revised text with introd. and commentary by Harold H. Joachim

131쪽

vhere in the sense that at V laces of the ma risuri SNnu taneouSIF mere are OintS. I i. g. the give imagnitude has been divide at iis centre, it cannot also b divide at a po intimmedia j-nex toriis Centre : for there is no su Cli potnt Onthe ther and the imagnitude naight have been divide at apoin immedia IF-n f to iis Centre ans ad os au iis Centre fora poliat might have been talcen here, instea Os at the Centre.

132쪽

86 COMMENTA RV

IT' ΙΟ-Ι2. ε . . . σύνθεσις. For is trivere divisibi e throti gh and

through, then, is it hie divisibi at iis centre, it vili e mulsib le

talces place in What is continuous' in contrast to the Change by vhicla a Uing dissocialed into discrete pari or a discrete pluralit associaled to orna a thing. τὸ δὲ διαφέρci, vherea in ac there is a dissere iace'. thereare t xv kind of Cla ange both of vhicla may be calle change in What is continuous'. these, i change in the constitutive

133쪽

this is a brachylog for υφθαρτα καὶ ἄφθαρτα δυσφθαρτα γίνεται. Association ' an 'dissociation are o γένεσις and φθορά, but dissociation ' may facilitate or asten, an association ' nayretard, γενεσις and φθορά.17 28-29. o. . . . βραδύτερον. AS ue hali earn present ly

susceptibi Et to φθορά.

134쪽

88 COMMENTA RV

The proper sense κυρίως, ' 33 is the unquali fied sense ἄπλῶς). Is here is substantia Change, i. e. Da nexu substance'

135쪽

or it position, ve ad a. quali sication to the em say it

exi Stentiat question is an inquir in to the eing of the in as

136쪽

9 COMMENTA RV

naean ei ther i that whicli is in thema ost generat and indeteriminate SenSe-a sense Whicli includes an an ali of the Categori es, vithout spe ibin wHcri si that whicli cis in the sense of One of the Categories a sense Whicli is determine e g. S substantiat 'or quantitative ' being, vithout furtiae specification os the se of substantia or quantitative ein amrnae d. ThUS Oh IVOuid affarna τι στιν ἄπλω os a naan in sense i is

138쪽

9 CUM MENTA RV

os the doctrine solae Thy sic leaves it as et uncertain What exacti ilae resupposed basis os substantia. γένεσις S, and indeed vhether inere an be Acoei os a substance at all-as Aristotie

139쪽

ilia Aristoti xvrote ει γαρ τόδε τι γίνεται. 17' 27-28. O . . . ν; καὶ ὁ is explanator O τόδε, and μηδ' ὁν

140쪽

9 COMMENTA RV