장음표시 사용
101쪽
Besore potiating ut to Euthypiam his naistalce Socrates proseSses his disbelle in suci legend abolit the gods, an suggest stat illis is Perilaps via laesis putipon his triat. The halbit os ut ting lae particular so the generat πολλὰ ποιεῖνε του ἐνος Menos A in a. definition is re*ienti illustiate in the Sociati dialogues. A good exaniple is Theaet. I 6 C-D. What
104쪽
FritZSClae reniaikS. In Rep. II 377 D . I lato rejecis ali inesecraule toties a salse an pei nictous God is altogether good and neve lies: ibid. 379 B and 38 D. In particular te eamphaticallyrCecis the stomes albout the nnatura conductis Cronus and eius: ibid. 377 E ὀρθίως ἔχει τά γε τοιαυτα μέμφεσθαι.-πρῶτον μὲν Ouέγιστον καὶ περὶ των με, στων εὐδος-os υρανός τε εἰργάσατο ἄφησι ὁραται αὐτον 'Hσωδos 5 τε α Κρυ s s ἐτιμωρήσατο αὐτον τα
27. μῖν notrior ἐμοί, butis 4riivalent to u layimen') μάντεις. So presently or γε αὐτοὶ μάλογοῖμεν περ αυτῶν μηδἐ ειδέναι Thesenseris nauch the sanae in I E πε καὶ συ ἐμ Οἴτω διδάξαι ζῖνα καὶ Mελητω λέγωμεν μηκέθ' ημας δικεῖν μηδἐ σεβείας γράφεσθαι, cs ἱκανῶς γ δ παρὰ σου cμαθηκότας τά τε εὐσεβη καὶ oσια καὶ τὰ μη. τί γα και φήσομεν. Cf. 3 A τί καὶ ποιουντα. Qui τί χρηλέγειν interrogat, is quid dici, non an ali liud dici det,eat quaerit; sed qui τί χρη καὶ λέγειν, is non Solum quid, sed etiam an aliquid dicendum sit cluibilat meritiann quote by FritZscite. 28. αὐτοι-μηδὲν δεναι αὐτοί os coiirse goes villa εἰδέναι See o αυτοὶ γὰρ ι ἄνθρωποι in albove. A negati e infinitive dependent o veri, sentientia e declarandi in reel generali talces ou μὴ is ometimes used ,3 Plato, vitii the effect os intensili ing
105쪽
32. οἱ πολλοί. λοιποί is a vatiant in sor πολλοί but theignorant multitude te here contrasted villa the εἶ τεχνικος ἁνὴρ or μάντις, vho i sanaitiar villa articles os salth no generat ly
pliori dena onstrative pronouia, O rei in conj. rel. Se on Apol. 4 A. The relative clatis is no v changed into a main Sentence. καὶ δὴ καί introduces a clinan a in pol. 26 D, και δ καὶ οἱ
νέοι ταυτα παρ' ἐμου μανθάνουσιν κτλ.τοῖς μεγάλοι Παναθηναίοις. Theie vere two Panathenaici estivais, ne annita anc leS gorgeoti τὰ IJαναθηναια τὰ κατ' ἐνιαυτιν, o Sinapi τὰ IJαναθήναια in Inscriptions also callec Ibywriter IJαναθηναια τὰ μικρά r μικρὰ Παναθηναια), the ther heldonce ver Mur earS, in the arci ea os ver Olympiad Παναθηναια τὰ με γάλα in Inscriptions callec also by writer τὰ Παναθὶ ναια τὰ μεγάλα or τα μεγάλα Παναθηναια). At ille alter, is not also in the or aer the evidence S contradictory), a rot)e.
106쪽
sense is adjectival but in reel μόνον, πρωτον etc. are occasionalty used so the correspondin adjectives Schan quotes Meno 1 ταυτα-ἀπαγγέλλωμεν; μη μόνον γε τλ. illiner i techiscite Grammatii II p. 236 Annaei lc. 3. a. ἄρτι in B albove.
In his hapter Socrates recalis Euthyplar to the potnt; Volirdefinition is no definition give me lae εἶδος πάντα τὰ σια ὁσιά
107쪽
IDA Good vin M. T. p. 8 notices inis sage in Herodotus and Thucydides biit it is no les conanion in Plato, or indeed in reelcgenerally. 1 o. ἀλλα γάρα latit in potnt os saet': se note o Apol.
nica ternis in lato's ineor of ideas, παράδειγμα in particula laeingcommon speciali in the latest phase of that ineory. Here thereis no allusion to in theor a 3 et tinborn there is ni a salthsul descriptionis Socrates' rule o conduci. s. infra mine at also Clito 64 and speciali Phaedo oo A etro θεμενος κάστοτε λόγον the λόγος ought aster in the Eustyptirocis o σων δ αν κρίνω
ἐρρωμενέστατον εἶναι, α ἐν α μοι δοκῆ τουτ συμφωνεῖν, τίθημι ος
ἀληθη ἔντα- δ α μη os υκ ἀληθη See Introductio p. xxviii. 24. καὶ Ουτω σοι φράσω. Euthyphi ' rea tines to fuit his manne of ans veran to the wants of his alidience is a poliat vilicii helias in common initii ille sopia ists of Plato' dialogues CL Gorgias in GOrg. 4 9 C. και γὰρ ad και τοὐτο ἔν ἐστιν ν φημί, μηὁένα αν ἐν βραχυτέροις ἐμοὐ ταὐτα εἰπεῖν. 27. ἔστι τοίνυν-ἀνόσιον Euthyphro' secon attenapi at definition is more successsiit He avoid solae ornier aiStalce sputting the particula sol 'lae generat but laxus hardi les sei totis reuiain. The vorsi not oin ted ut tili Ch. XII soli. is stili ducto simple conversion os the universa amuniative: becauSe altholines is dear to the gods, it oes no solio v that ali that is dearto e god is hol iness. Euthyphro in actitit a πάθος of hol inessin place of iis Ουσία. On in definition in geneia se Inlrod.
108쪽
A 29. παγκάλως expreSSes Socrates satisfactio stat Euthyphrolatis Scape his sol me error. Just so in the Theaetetus 1 8 ὶ, i me Theaetetus an his men silex that he have surinounted the ars mssiculi os desining Socrates bui Sis ut ἄριστά γ' ἀνθρώπων, s παιδες.
πάντα τα σια σιά ἐστιν no V σια re solvo ortS-Imen and deecis applied o naen, ὁ σως has a Subjective sense applied tocleeds, an objective the Stilbilivision is there re necessar tot histrate πάντα τα σια.
109쪽
other vord have a positive meanin in reetc. See Alcibiades III 38 D soli and speciali Protag. 33 i A soli. υκ ἄρα ἐστὶν σώτmola δίκαιον εἶναι πραγμα, οὐδε δικαιοσύνη ola o σιον, ἀλλ' ἶον μηόσιον ' η δὲ ὁσιότης ola μη δίκαιον, ἀλλ' ἄδικον ἄρα, τ ὁ ἀνόσιον Stili more clear is Rep. IV 437 C τι ὁ χι ro βουλε, και η ἐθέλειν μηδ' ἐπιθυμΓν υ εις et ἁπωθεῖν και ἀπελαύνειν ἀπ' αὐτm Sc της ψυχης καὶ εἰς παντα τἀναντία ἐκείνοις θήσομεν πῶς γὰρ ς;
αμαθές η οὐκ ησθησαι ὁτι ἔστι τι μεταξύ σοφίας καὶ μαθίας hautoni Icilla a vie 'o mahe oon sor the Platoni doeti in os ὀρθη δόξα. It was ver prevalent among the Greelis, and ma PerhaPSbe illustrate by the Solonian lai requiring Very one to talce adefinite fide in politica questions There are se ver meret negative notions in reel than in En lista inllisae are notovise naeniat to Greeli allisae are ools'. The whole sui feci is discussed 3yTheodor oci in Hernies XVIII p. 4 ff. Ein apite ait dersormalena o ik, angeu endet ait Aristoteles in Platon . . o ταὐτὸ δ εστίν. his explanator clause introduced asusual by δέ is inserted to prepare so the reductio ad abstinae ιm fra καὶ ὁσια ἄρα και νόσια τα αὐτα αν ειη, Ἐὐθύφρον, τούτwτ λόγ*. δέ stand in theolair place, to a void the union os o an δέ V. Schang. For o ἐναντιῶτατον alto ether iis opposite ' cf. ILysis
110쪽
staternent has been inade ali eady in D τ ανόσιον αἴ τοῖ με ὁσίου π αν τὰς ἐναντίον vhere παν τὰ ἐναντίον 1 Practicali equivalent toεναντιώτατον. I conjecture that the comuption rose laus Aster δοκω, ῶ Σίκρατες, ille orcis εἴρηται γάρ vere addedi the margint y a. OpyiSt, perhaps vitia a reserene to 5 D above, to inlicate that the staternent hac bee macte abiready Being after ardsintroduce into the texi, the were the occasionis the omissionis ειρηται aster ἴτως, the more readdy, inaSinucia a. εἰρησθαι, εἴρηται,
an presenti εἴρηται γάρ occur in the immediate vicinity. 8. καὶ ὁ γε φαίνεται εἰρῆσθαι is a Ned by Socrates hecause in aSSertion vas previoust made by Socrates, no hi Euthuphro 3 in Socrates visites to have the sentiment approve hy Euthy-plaro, in orde that herina contributerio his o vn discom fi trire. 9. δοκῶ sor vlaici Schleierinaciae Suggeste δοκεῖ, is no rarely used in the sense of δοκε μοι, e. g. Rep. V 473 I οὐκ ἔστι κακων παυλα-ται πολεσι, ox δ' ὐὁ τλάνθρωπίν γένει. A distinctusage is δοκω sor δοκεῖ μοι it seena good o me' .g. Agam. 16 3ταν
I . ἔχθρα δὲ καὶ ργάs: ὁργαι irae are the particularebullitions of the permanent state εχθρα. The in lar ἔχθραν is hept probabi out os a destre to consortii to ἔχθρα ust he re. For a simila reaso ἔχθραν δ καὶ ὀργά is place firs in the
and weight. The ali belong to the naateria universe, being thingsων α δυνάμεθα πριξ τοῖν χεροῖν λαβέσθαι Schan apti quotes Xen. Mem. I I. 9 δαιμονα δἐ sc ἔφη ὁ Σωκράτm καὶ τοὐς
μαντευομένους α τοῖς ἀνθρύποι ἔδωκαν οἱ θεοὶ μαθουσι διακρίνειν ' χνκτλ. τὶ ἔξεστιν ἀριθμήσαντας η μετρήσαντας η στησαντας εἰδέναι, τούς τα τοιαυτα παρὰ των θεων πυνθανομένους ἀθέμιστα ποιεῖν
πιεῖτο See also Rep. io εαρ' υν οὐ τὰ μετρεῖν καὶ ἀριθμεῖν καὶ ἱστάναι βοηθειαι χαριέσταται ris αυτὰ ἐφάνησαν, στε μηάρχειν ν ηψν τ φαινόμενον μεῖζον η ἔλαττον η πλέον ὴ βαρύτερον κτλ.', an Alcib. I III B soli. ἱ υν δοκοῖσί σοι διαφέρεσθαι οἱ πολλοὶ et om ἐστι λίθος η ξύλον, To sin a. μέτρον sor inaniaterial