장음표시 사용
71쪽
or γραφη. The fir St was a civi fuit ille alter illae a crina inal ora Phihili process, in xvlaici in state a represente l) an Allieniancifige in the stili exercise of his rights xva ProSecutor Anaccusation Os φόνος inasin γραφη : ut Euinyphro here se thema ore genera terna in Orcle noto prejudge in natur of the case in viaici Socrates nisi be concern ed. In Socrates caresul distinctionibet veen γραφὴ an δίκη in his repi Scia an Sees a delicate sarcasinon Euthypltro' vaunte acciti ac in the his of nanaes : See Ciat.
72쪽
9. καταγνώσομαι. καταγιγνῶσκειν S to See a. veat pol ni inone APOl. - Α πολλην γέ μου κατέγνωκα δυστυχίαν Phaed. 116 οὐ καταγνίσομαί γε σοῖ ὁ περ των ἁλλων καταγιγνίσκω. o γὰρ
που is Mund in ne inserior S, I henc Stephanus read υ γὰρ σου; ,ut the inission solae genitive is accounte sor by the presenc os σύ in the nex clauSera συ τερον. Compare huc. VI 3 . O . ἐπέρχονται γαρ ἡμῖν os Ux ἀμυνουμένοις, δικαίως κατ εγνω- κιτες τι αὐτοὐς οὐ μετὰ Λακεδαιμονίων ἐφθείρομεν. T laete litis
S in Aristolle Emic Nic. IX I 166 7 ἐτέρων με ἐπιθυμουσιν ἄλλα δἐ βούλονται. Here perilaps me ingle S intended to Suggest Euthyphro' peculia tricli os language: See Crat. 396 I and
Introd. p. XXiii. 1 . οὐδ' αὐτὁ πάνυ τι γιγνώσκω m ne ipse quidem satis
novi M. On οὐ πάνυ se Ri ideir Digest os Platoni Diona. 139.
73쪽
71. The additionis ille adve hiat τι malles the expression agile and les emphatic, o Phaed. 57- Οὐδεὶς πάνυ τι ἐπιχωριάζ ει α iis Ἀθήναζε Rep. IV I9- ἐάν τίς σε φη μη πάνυ τι εὐδαίμονας ποιHν
74쪽
et . τίνα τρόπον οἱ νεοι διαφθείρονται. For e ternas of the indictiment of Socrates se Apol et B Σωκράτη φησὶν sc DIIέλητος
Εὁικεῖν τούς τε νέου διαφθείροντα καὶ eoos os η πόλει νομίζειου νομίζοντα ἔφρα δὲ δαιμόνια καινά. 26. κινδυνεύει σοφό τις εἶναι κινουνεύει α δοκεῖ as osten in
75쪽
used a the opposite o σοφος. Notice ille implicatio that vice isdue to ignorance ἀμαθία). lais loctrine is si equently legar edas peculia to Socrates: ut it is enalbeddec in the Greelc langu age. Talce sor exaniple the ivor istas αθmἈπαίδευτος ἁγνίμων Primarilyinese Nord denoted a vant of intellectua cultivation biit in practice ille are osten used os deficient n)ora culture ἀμαθης se Vera ali on Medea et hi thoorasti' inseeling ' ἀπαίδευτο is laude an ἀγνώμων unicinit'. An intutore intellect Dona the Greel potnt of vie v implies imora delin itiency since in thenouristitia penod o Greel lis intellect and vili are o disci in)inate l. The sanae poliat os lex comes ut in lato' theor os education Rep. VI-VIIJ triae education a valcen ἐπιστημη, and cloes no implant ὀρθη δόξα and ἐπιστημ means the regeneration περιαγωγὴ of the entii e man, mora as vel as intellectual. As tolli syntax, note ἐμην - εμου vitii διαφθεὶροντος. 28. s πρὸ μητερα πρὁ την πόλιν. ad Plato hosen tomalce the simile an identification, he votii have onait ted in secondπρι as obet requires. Se on Crito 6 C: Is it is vistaei tobrino the ol feci conapared into the loses possitae union, σπερ os, καθάπερ ivitii in Preposition is placed ii si, and the prepositioniiseis vritten oni orice : Rep. VIII 5 5 os προς παῖδας μας παιζούσα καὶ ἐρεσχηλούσας'. Where Iσπερ viti the repositionprecedes, Cobet Uarriae Lectiones p. 165 Mil. xvould in ver case telete e secon preposition biit te defies the SS. Oster visei,otii reposition aie in se ited and in case the ol feci conapared
s= si reposition is ni it ted villa prece ling σπερ Vig. Phaed. 67 ἐκλυομένην σπερ δεσμων leg. εκ δεσμων urit hi j and Tina. 79 Aρεῖν σπερ αὐλωνος leg. δια αὐλωνος δια του σώματος. A laer-Hin retalias σπερ αὐλῶνος. The iotherhood of the state is theleadin motive os ille Crito se the editor' introductio toraliat dialogue): Socrates spurne the teniptation to ,reat he laxus asparricide On his te v rested durin in imost sotu istitias periodihe entire labricis Gieel civici . It is vortia os renaari ita at the Cretans calle thei counir μητρίς Rep. IX 575 Din.
76쪽
I 83 D καλῶ μὰν πραττομενον καλόν, αἰσχρως δε αἰσχρόν. αἰσχρως μεν ἶν ἐστι πονηρω τε καὶ πονηροῦ χαρίζεσθαι, καλῶ δἐ χρηστω τε καὶ χρηστοῦς. 3I. πιμεληθῆναι true to his natale ελητος so infra 3 ἐπιμεληθείs. f. pol. 25 vhere se note), Μέλητε-ἀμέλειαν μεμέληκεν and 264 Μελήτω τούτων με μέγα γε μιπον πί- ποτε ἐμέλησεν. In Aristoph. an. 99-99 I inere is perii aps asinai lar uia on Meletus nanae, κεχηνότες μαμμάκυθοι, μελιττίδαι v. l. μελητίδαι καθηντο cs ibid. 3oa. For similar plays poni Grcis in Plato and the principi xvhicli sine involve se o Crito 6 and speciali et ιστάτη καὶ etrato ν τι . t hould the renaarhed that ἐπιμελεῖσθαι vas alimost a technica teri os the Socratic ethics Crito 1 A): Socrates iniseis habituali prosessed
ἐπιμελεῖσθαι dρετm. 3 a. γεωργὁ ἀγαθόν. eie illi Legin the a ricultui a meta-plior, continue J in ἐκκαθαίρει an in τὰς βλάστας compare Re P. 1 589 et oi πάλυκεφαλου θρέμματος ἐπιμελησεται σπερ γεωργός,τα ἐν μερα τρέφων καὶ τιθασεύων, τὰ δε αγρια ἁποκωλυων φύεσθαι. Tlae γεωργι is the σοφος κατὰ φυτά Theaet. 67 ): so Meletus pose a. ὁ κατὰ νέους σοφ5ς. A to the StilbJec matter, note in
sc. τὶ πολιτικὴ πλείστην ἐπιμέλειαν ποιεῖται του ποιούς τινα καὶ ἁγαθούς ob πολίτας ποιησαι καὶ πρακτικοὐ των καλων. In lacteilaic an politic vere no Separated in Plato' time, since τι νόμιμονατο δίκαιον-tiae lax of the state is the la vis moralit forine man. Introduction to Crito, p. xiii. Ont Doni hi potntos lex canis e se in true unit of the Republic ulicta, thoughit is callec πολιτεία, is alimos a much ethica a political It wason ly viae naan vas orcitu torn Dor the state thyii log os civicseedoni that Aristoti ivrote an ethica treati se a distinc hona
politics. In the econditace, Observe the paramolint importancellere assigne to the care of the oling Sound educatio seem exto Plato the ni possiti te salvatio sor a state: ευ τραφεντων καὶ τρεφομένων των νεων πάντα μῖν κατ υθον πλεῖ gg. VII 813 ID).33. καὶ δη καί introduces in applicatio a. in Crito DC
77쪽
haps a Some pestilent InonSter Preyin Onolle oun planis CL Arist. Hist. n. IX 62 43 τὰ ὁ γινομεν θηρία ἐν τοῖς σμγεσι καὶ λυμαινόμενα τα κηρια αἱ ἐν χρησταὶ μελιτται ἐκκαθαίρουσιν. Hii Schig' ἐκκαθαρῶ is uiane cessary, and in ac les forcit, te an l
35. οὐ των νέων τὰς λάστας ιαφθείροντας. There is much iron in thi clause, expressed by lacin ii aster in veri, ἐκκαθαίρει, an ad lingulae Noreis Is φησιν. FritZsche veli coim PateSAPOl. 3 2L. εὐρησετε-πάντας εμοὶ βοηθεῖν ἐτοίμους τ δια φθείροντι τω κακα ἐργαζομέν, τους οἰκείους αυτῶν si φασι Mελητος καὶ Ανυτος Formi generat dea claan Conapares Le g. V 765 E παισο γαρ δη φυτο η πρίτη βλάστη καλῶς ὁρμηθεiσαπρις ρετρο τη αὐτο φύσεως κυριωτάτη τελος ἐπιθεῖναι το πρόσφορον and lbid. VII 813 quote albove on et D. The vor is τῶν νέων are brachete h) Schang, solio vin Gona perg, chiest o theground that τὰς βλάστανα τούς νεου illa me ad litionat agit cultui alidea caninione orna a coirect antilliesis to των πρεσβυτέρων ibia Ithini in xvor is are right forcit is quit in Plato' style in passingston the sinaile to the application to laoose vortas applicabie obolli τὰς βλάστα to agriculi tu e , and των νέων to me oung CL note ii Crito 7 naoreove τὰς βλάστα των νέων is nore hanτob νέου or τας βλάστα alone sincerit acans the levetopiment or sproti tini' os lae oling. lae idea contained in the soti orcis is aster ard expande in the Phaedrias: vliere philosophic Eρως is vie vexas that whicla oster tiae pioiitin os ille vings os the solit την βλάστην του πτερου): Phaedr. 2 6 C soli For a sinitiar Juxta- position solae conaparison anciolae hin conlpared, See Alc. II 3 I9- εἰς το θεῖον καὶ λαμπρ ὁ ὁρωντες,- εἰς το θεον καὶ σκοτεινον βλέποντες. Lie dioid in ille 'Vochen sciaris stir I lassische Plii lologie 1888 o. o p. 226 also retain των νέων, regardiniit asan echo os the vortas τους νέους in the indictinent: hut e cantiar lini e right in claangin τας βλάστας to ob βελτίστους. m. ἔπειτα μετὰ τοὐτο. Not exacti a CaS Os lae σχημα κπαραλλήλου. πειτα COITOS Pond to πρῶτον μέν ἔπειτα and εἶτα aieniore connimo than ἔπειτα δέ and εἶτα δέ ac in the second place 'to in me sirst place': viaile μετὰ τουτω μετὰ τ ηιιας ἐκκαθαίρειν. Coinpare Aristoph. an. Ioa εἶτα διδάξας Πέρσας μετὰ τοὐτ' ἐπιθυμεῖν ἐξεδίδαξα κτλ.39. ἀρξαμένω c. ελήτω τω ρξαμένω vould naalce laestate ment generat.
78쪽
The Introductio is here continued Euthyplaro is indi antilati Socrates liould he accused os laeterodox and insuli caSt upontiae professionis the μάντις to vhicla both helonged. a. ὀρρωδῶ is a very strong vord, Suggesting the plabsical resultSos excessive ear.
ἀτεχνῶς γαρ μοι δοκεῖ. ἀτεχνῶν iteralty absolutely is USedo intensis a Staternent, specian a simile or as here a proveri, it is oppoSed to σχεδόν τι, ἔμβραχυ vitia relatives onlyinori ἔπος εἰπεῖν, vlhicla Imodi fies a universa afficinative o negative.
corner-Stone of AthenS. lato clainis exacti the sanie honou sortiis imaster a the frate ἐστί os Ainens he oo hould hi supported in the Prytaneum Apol. 1. XXVIJ CL Org. et D οἶμαι μετ' ὀλίγων Ἀθηναίων , μη εἴπω μόνος ἐπιχειρεῖν τη ς ἁληθως πολιτικητέχν καὶ πράττειν τα πολιτικὰ μόνος των νυν But EuthyphroreSenis in accusationi Socrates hecausea Delthinaseis attached through thim Socrates is to hii a μάντις, and μαντικὴ he regard asilie aset os in State. See Introd. p. XXi. . κακουργεῖν την πόλιν κακουργεῖν i oppoSed to πλείστων και μεγίστων ἀγαθων αἴτιος- γενῆσεται. Notice lae implicatio that
79쪽
8. ποιητὴν εινα θεῶν It is vortia viaile to notice lae gradualdevelopi Dent os lae metapho Dona the naint. καινός ratiae than νεος is used O ne v Oinage: s. r. an. 72 ἔς τε τἀρχαῖον νόμισμα και τ καινὰν χρυσίον. Presenti in αρχαίους υ νομίζοντα me metaplior coi De into si hi sor νομίζειν and iis derivatives naean o only belleve in vorsia ip', I, ut also uo iis ascurrent coin'. See Ar. Nul). 2 7-2 9 a passage recisel Sinaitarto his ποίους θεούς με σύ πρύτον γαρ θεοὶ μῖν νόμισμ' υκ ἔστι. τ γὰρ μνυτ' τὶ σιδαρέοισιν, σπερ εν Βυζαντίω In ille ae Pl os Euthyphro the aetaPlior is explicit Ουν καινοτομουντός σουπερ τὰ θεῖα κτλ.Io. τούτων αυτῶν ἔνεκα, s φησιν. The iecision os τούτωναυτῶν νες strinining u se καινούς-νομίζοντα folio vec enipla ali-
catly h, ῶς φησιν echoing the φησί villa viaicla the sentence thegi iis)insinuate that Meletus vas no actitated sol ely by a ea sor the
80쪽
national aith. In the in lictiment gainst Socrates sor vllicla see albovem et C it is clea that in reli ous accusation vas introducedoni to give a Molliolint the grave charge of corriapting the youm: i .e the religioli Charge vas ancillar to the socia and politicat. At the sanae time it laould be rememtbered that o ving to the
constitution os in ancient state heterodoX vas equivalent tot reaSon. In pol. 23Ε-2 A a Persona motive so in prosecution is assi nec Mελητός μοι πέθετο xa Ἀνυτος καὶ Λύκων, Μελητο μεν περ των ποιητῶν χθόμενος, A νυτο ὁ ὐπερ των δημιουργῶν καὶ των πολιτικων, Λύκων δε περ των ρητόρων. II. μανθάνω ὁτι o δαιμόνιον-γίγνεσθαι It is ibarelypossibi that μανθάνω i intended to Stiggest μάντις Euthyphro asappear in Cratylus 396 D vas addicted to the etymologica pun.
ista lae vas alimosi is no quit the sole possessor divine voice' Rep. VI 96 C h γάρ mi τινι ιλλ η μηδενὶ των ἔμπροσθεν
ina pellenti, saepe no Semper revocanti. Notice that γίγνεσθαι is o technica expression or the appearanceis Socrates δαιμόνων Schang): see o Crito 6 B. I 3. καινοτομουντoS. New Coinage is apto b inferior to M Ar Ran. I R. at id καινοτομεῖν in lato xvii employ the voretoni as a metaphor at 1 ab A denotes a change so the wrse, lihe
1 . ias διαβαλῶ δή δὴ is inere re'. διαβά λειν vas a re larteriti in Athenian lax sor in opposite os a sat an honoui albie
accusation κατηγορεῖν): s. litic. III et εἶ μὸν πεῖν υ αν γεῖται περὶ του μη καλου δύνασθαι, ε δε διαβαλο εκπληξαι αν κτλ.