Euthyphron. Euthyphro; with introd. and notes by J. Adam

121쪽

But vhat os the word ἀλλα γὰρ υ τούτεεφάνη ἄρτι. ωρισμένα bo σων κ ὶ μὴ ' ὁ γαρ θεομισε δ καὶ θεοφιλῆ ἐφάνη I belleve lienito have been interpolate by sonae scribe xvii falle to gras thesiluation. For, O the suppositio that the are genuine, τούτvi

argumenti xvlaici ἀνόσιον has hi leno been dented ton, identical vitii θεομισές, is that at the god do notiate the sanae thing, Or, Sthe explanator clause put it presently το θεομισες ν καὶ θεοφιλὲς ἐφάνη. ut his scius the argument vitici Socrates fias declared that he is ready to give up he wid alio v for argument' Salce, thalaia the god destiat the ac o Euthyphro' lather Moreover, it is intoleratile to have three cases of the pronou τοὐτο villain Murlines, whereos the rs and thir reser to the fame hing, and the secon to ometh in quite disserent. In theolair place, στεhesore τούτου is hardi intelligibi excepi notae suppositio that ἀλλα γα ἐφάνη is ither purioris o eis a complete parentheSiS. I therefore θεομισές is the antecedent to τούτ*, the entire clausemust be Cected. I lao veve the antecedent is b τοὐτο το ἔργον, as Schan belleves, the another viet is possitae. The ineaning

122쪽

persona element in ine age hecis stili anchore in the hamoliros liet 1 doin xultates in doin no v '. The reserenc in αρτι vili in that case be to the relatation os Euinyphro'. si attempt

ἁπαντε τον τοιουτον θάνατον γουνται ἄδικον εἶναι Seem to hex '

tion it is necessarni reject theo rcis τὸ γαρ θεομισὲς δν κα θεοφιλὸς ἐφάνη so Schang, follo in Kleistin, hecatis the reser to the refutatio of the seco=ad definition umeretis o Schang' vie xv thereserence throughout is to the firSt. Schang' explanatio fuit thepassage talcen a itSel quite veli hut it seenis to irae a flatu in Plato' art, i aster the fars definitio has been quite refuted on laeground os pulting the particula forme univerSal, an an emor potnted ut in in Secon definition, he hould har bach againupo the firsi definition, Mithoiit a me Same time preparing the way ago conceive hin to have done for discoverin another

Meisiectans Grammatii de Att. Inschristen p. 32. Cobet Nov.

123쪽

Presenti λόγω is sinapi definition'. 15. o ' αν-ἀμφότερα. his claus is reali tantamorint to a surrender of in definition i αμφότερα is talcen SeriouSty ab ingcannot be hiothaol and inholy. But υδέτερα η αμφότερα Sint a way of Sabring that where e godidisse in their like and distilces, inere is no question o holines involved For the expreSSion cf. Rep. II 365 E li λαμφότερα η Οὐδέτερα πειστέον. The pluralis regular: in αμφότερα it is logicali right whil in Mέτερα it is probabi due to a destre sor uniformityoniade easte by the Greelctendene to Se neuter plural as a Single notion φανερά ἐστι etc.), as in the case of τα ἔτερα θάτερα Phaed. 68 C φιλοχρήματος

καὶ φιλότιμος, τοι τα ἔτερα τούτων η καὶ αμφότερα.I9. τί γα κωλύει. Euthyplar tallis viti the air tone os aman whose minxi atready made p. The editor quot an exactparallel frona Charm. 163- τί γα κωλύει ἔφη. ουδὲν ἐμέ γε, ην δ' ἐγί, ἀλλ' ὁρα μη κεῖνον κωλύει κτλ.eto. τό σον σκόπει εἰ i exacti equivalent a Schan remarhs

up the participia clause Οὐτο ποθέμενος. The tisage is frequent in Plato e .g. Org. 457 C ob gὁίως ὁύνανται-μαθόντες καὶ διδάραντε s

124쪽

B, C . A stud of these passages hexus that πάντες eo and πάντες οἱ θεo differ his ac alliods', and ad the gons ' in lalter is themore re lar an sorma expression sor vllicli reason it is used in in suggeste definition D an in the first par of Euthyphro's

28. ἐὰν μόνον η τί τι ἔχειν υτω. What reciselycis themeaning os τι and the resereno in ἴτω I the ex is right thesiluation is inis A naan uses Euthyphro' definitio as his λόγος, an asseris that a particular aci τι squares vitia illis definition ἔχειν Θω i. e. is θεοφιλές or θεομισές as Euthyphro asserte ostiis

Here an in XIII, Socrates est in antende definition. In the preSent hapter, argpuin hom analoo, hie he iaa σων isno θεοφιλές, Iecause 1 mile a. φιλούμενον Ivhereos θεοφιλε is ne special cind is a. φιλούμενον θεοφιλές ἔτι φιλεῖται, σων is notoσιον τι φιλεῖται, raster ὁτι σι ιν ἐστι φιλεῖται. I. 'αxα-εἰσόμεθα. Schanc rem indS ii that τάχα in Prose

125쪽

oni mean. goon' vhen combinem vitia a suture tense. It is especiali common initia σομαι. 3. φιλεῖται πωτων θεῶν m θεοφιλές ἐστιν. 1 As. υκ οἶδ' ὁ τι λέγειs: the distinctio belwee πάθos and ουσία 1 not et lamilia to Euthyphro compare infra nox οὐχ ἔπομαι, ῶ Σίκρατες, τοῖς λεγομένΩις. 7. λέγομεν τι φερόμενον καὶ ψον κτλ. Socrates in ine Platoni malogue frequently thes in to uita up an argument in illis ay in Phaed. Iox θερμον τι καλεις καὶ ψυχρον Meno 75 τελευτην καλεῖ τι Where FritZSche rem indS us that e Xenophontic Socrates heius in Same tendency e. g. ena. II a. I εἰπε μοι, ἔφη, ῶ παῖ, οἶσθά τινα ανθρίπους χαρίστους καλουμένους ibid. IV 2. 22. Theotistinctio bet veen active an passive is algo found in Gorg. 76 B compare also Theaet. 56 Acis It is ivortii vitile noticinguia the example chiose hi Socrate φερόμειων ἀγόμενον, ορίμενον and thei accives are frona in materiai vortu, in vilicholae distinctioni active an passive scies hard to grasp. The selectiono φερομενον as an example naturali Suggests, γόμενον S another: the aie osten combined in in phras φέρειν καὶ ἄγειν. II. καὶ τοίτου τερον το φιλοῖ is no essentia to me argument, excepi in sociar a It defines φιλούμενον by contrast.

1 διότι φερεται The wor διότι is preserie to the more Io usual oτι hecatis it balances δι' ἄλλο τι better. I7. καὶ το ἀγόμενον δή. δὴ is then and καί also'. The collocation is common in Plato. δη raret solio us αἱ directi as in

Rep. VI 9o καὶ δη et ιν δελον της φιλοσοφου φύσεως χορόν κτλ.eto. υκ ἄρα διότι κτλ. The dative αρα sciustified hecatis ille resulis are hein Summedip. Notice the Orderi enunieration Itis exacti the reverse of that in ivlaici the illustrations vere cited, and produces a chiaStic effect Formeri φερόμενον, γόμενον, πίμενον : OI Oρίμενον, ἁ γόμενον, φερόμενον. 2Ι. Ουναντίον Advectia accusative in apposition to thesentence: Semon τουναντίον τούτου παν in Apol. 25 B. 25. κατάδηλον is Sald of Something vhicla comes graduall intovie v. f. olit. 29 Ajχλον-δ αρτι κατάδηλος νυν μῖν γεγονεν.κατά has the Same orce in καταφαίνομαι an καταφανής.

126쪽

πάσχοντα as ἄγεσθαι, φέρεσθα0 mough in the ast analysis uiney

sint in proeliis intersecti V allud in to the Menexenusin. I o. ἄλλο τι ἄλλο τι fir numquid aliud quam ' nonne η is osten omitted. See o Apol et M. manda both have ἁλλ' ἔτι.

Ε, ὁ ἐν σων δια τουτ φιλεῖσθαι, τι σιόν ἐστιν κτλ. correspondSto δωτι ἄρα σων στιν, φιλεῖται κτλ. an τὸ δε γε θεοφιλες τι

φιλεῖται πὰ θεων, αὐτω τούτ* τ φιλεῖσθαι θεοφιλὸς εἶναι corresponds' ἁλλα ἐν δη διότι γε φιλεῖται πὰ θεων, φιλούμενόν εστι και θεοφιλες ατ θεοφιλές . Compare also II A και δια τὰ θεοφιλὲς εἶναι φιλεῖτο αν τὰ θεοφιλές, εἰ δὲ δια ὁ φιλεῖσθαι ποθεῶν τὼ θεοφιλες θεοφιλε ην κτλ.53. ἐτερον τουτο τούτου. For the collocatio FritZSche compares Meno 87 D ἔμοιγε δοκεῖ τοὐτο μετὰ τοὐτο σκεπτέον εἶναι.

127쪽

The naistalce committe by Euthyphro is here presente acine substitution o a πάθος of το σιον sor it οὐσία. Aster a coni plainthoni Euthyphimon the be viiderint natur os Socrates dialectic, Socrate renaaik villa a vie v to a nexu definition stias ali ho nessu mora biit no allisaoralit is oly'. Euthyphro is puggled: an Socrates explain by naean o an illustration the cisterence be- tween theseri vo propositionS. The fit stri vo sentence of this Chapter belon imole properi toChapter XII. For the clivisionis his dialogues into cla apter Platois no responsile an Schan discard the division entii et in his later eritionS. 6. Ἀ ε γε ταὐτὸν κτλ. Theraeasonin is Some vhat difficuli, IO Ethough persecti cori ecl. It is destredo prove stat σιον and θεοφιλές remo convertibi ter s. f the were, then a SuppoSingὁσων vere love hecatis it is ἴσων θεοφιλές vould , love be- causerit is θεοφιλές-but his is notiso, since the tritin is θεοφιλές sola φιλεῖσθαι theca his it is love το ἐν γάρ, τι φιλεῖται, ἐστὶν

loved ὁσων votita be σιον becatis it is loved, - vliereas the trilinis ὁσων is love hecaus it is ola φιλεῖσθαι το δ' ὁτι ἐστὶν οἱονφιλεῖσθαι, δια τουτ φιλεῖτα0. Sotiat onmeither Supposition an θεοφιλές and ἄσων', identis ed. It is note vorin uiat the clauseSει ἐν φιλεῖτο, and εἰ ἐ- θεοφιλῆ ην have ne veri, in the Imperfect Indicative, althou la the supposition is in iovi CaSes atrii one this is clue, parti to the influence of ε γε αὐτον η to vhicla these two clauses are stilbordinate, Iut stili imore toritae olimos in anticipate conclusion και ἐφιλεῖτο αν το θεοφιλές an καὶ

parasset case Apol. 33 D. II. o δέ hitit ascit is i nunc is regulari used in introducino I Athe triae state of the case aster an uiatrue supposition villa εἰ and apas tenSe os the Indicative e. . Prol. 335 C ἀλλα σὐ χρην μῖν συγχωρKν- νυν δὸ ἐπειδὴ Οὐκ ἐθέλεις κτλ.

128쪽

86 NOTES ON XIII II A

21. με ὁτιδὴ πάσxει ut illud, ita omnia accidentia πάθη indefiniendo nudius momenti sunt Volitrab. et . ἀλλ' ἁ Σώκρατες κτλ. The inte lude is intendeduo mari abreat in the coiirSe os in reasoning anxio preparem sor ine restistari, in vitici Socrates endeavour to rescite Euthyptiro Doni the απορία into vhicla hecis nox plunged. o πω σοι εἴπω ὁ νοῶ Euthyphro' ἀπορία has no ted inito distrus hina Aelf he stili Dei that he has texus, and ames Socrates dialecti for thei disconisi ture. Contrast Theaet. I ME

θυμίμεθα, perii aps h reason of λλ' εἰπὸ προθύμως bove: See also on ξυμπροθυμήσομαι in belo v. The doctrine is personified, as osten in Plato. It is o to speat an adherent of the Heraclitean πάντα ρεῖ See Theaet. 79 E τεχνω γαρ κατα τα συγγράμματα φέρονται Sc. Οἱ ρακλείτειοι), το δ' ἐπιμεῖναι ἐπὶ

129쪽

28. του μετέρου προγόνου. A the Son o a Sculptor, Socrates trace his descens 'o Daedalus, the eponyimous heimo artisis. Sol Alc. I 2I A καὶ γαρ το μέτερον γενναῖε Ἀλκιβιάδη, εις Δαίδαλον. f. also Symp. 86 here Eryximachus in doctor Spea k of ὁ μέτερος πρόγονος Ἀσκληπιός. In Meno 97 Di Plato compares ληθεῖς δόξαι to the woric o Daedalus, ,ecati se nisi asthe alter ἐὰν ἐν μη δεδεμένα η, ποδιδράσκει καὶ δραπετεύει, ἐὰν δὸδεδεμένα, παραμένει S true opinion δραπετευουσιν της ψυχης του νθρωπου, στε υ πο λου ἄξιαί εἰσιν, ἔως αν τις αὐτὰς δήση αἰτίας

130쪽

οἰχήσεται.

37. δεῖσθαι τὰ λεγόμενα. Contrast τὰ πι σου λεγόμενα inline 29 above. The omission here of π σου is intende to malce

Socrate Paril responsibi sor What has been said. το γὰρ περιιεναι τούτοι κτλ. περιιέναι not περιέρχεσθαι, ctough περιερχεται in II B albove See Cobet Variae Lectiones p.

34, 3o7. Excepi in the case of περχεσθαι in the derive sense os sau ning on ' Crito 3 in the paris of ρχομαι an it compOundSomer than in present Indicative are Supplied DOm εἶμι ηα, ω, χιμι, ἴθι, ἰέναι, ὀίν, fui. λαι). Notice in clos parallel vitii 1 B:

라틴어 텍스트