Euthyphron. Euthyphro; with introd. and notes by J. Adam

81쪽

18. καταγελῶσιν ω μαινομένου. AS is the μάντις vel e μανικός soro ne Voret μαινομένου naturali Suggerit μάντις See Phaedr. in τῶν παλαιῶν οἱ τα νόματα τιθέμενοι Ου αἰσχρονηγοῖντο οὐδἐ ονειδος μανίαν. o γὰρ ν τῆ κα λίστη τέχνI, τι μέλλον κρίνεται, αυτ bis in O Oύνομα εμπλέκοντες μανικην κάλεσαν.

η των ε μφρόνων.

ἀλλ' - εναι Notice the lalee id occhum ence of αλλά in lareetines : in the sirs and last caserit ornis the natura adversative tothe negatives in the secon it has lae essec os a pili tec exhor

82쪽

CHAPTER III.

83쪽

ob δἐ χρήματα με λαμβάνων διαλέγομαι, μη λαμβάνων ἐου,

ἁλλ' ὁμοίως και πλουσί κα πενητι παρέχω μαυτον ερωτῆν κτλ.

85쪽

κατὰ νουν.

et . οἶμαι δὲ καὶ ἐμὲ την μή v. The idioni να δἐ αἱ is frequent in Plato, solio ved illae by the accusative xvi in infinitiveinor by the nominative, Since οἶμαι is osten meret parentiletical: Schan quotes inter ali, Laeli. 8 Α οἶμαι δε καὶ Λάχητα τόνδε an Cras . o B οἶμαι δ καὶ 'Hσίοδος. μέ is here pieserre tolli more regula εγο t prevent in doulbi in to Haether 'ria is the subjeci to οἶμαι or to the infinitive understoodin the ollier possitae constraaction the omissionis εμέ is notitiose hiecause an antithesis is xvante to σύ. Similari in Soph. 3 Ε οἶμαι δὲ καὶ ε μ των ἔτι πυρωθεν ἀφεστηκότων εἶ ι an so res 'lari in Plato xvlienoἶμαι δἐ καί is solio ved by theos pers prono vitii the infinitive, not οἶμαι δἐ καὶ γί. There is only one revioris allusion to Euthypiam' δίκη vir in et Ais γάρ που και σοί γε δίκη τις ἴσα

86쪽

αδ goes villa μαίνεσθαι GraSer changes ἔν O ην, o Seein that τίνα is masculine. 6. πετόμενόν τινα διώκειs p. are Oia on a vita goose chase Θ'

Socrates playstili understand διίκειν in iis littera sense. The Proveri, τα πετόμενα διίκειν amight vel hie applied to a naadinan αδ δοκῶ μαίνεσθαιὶ it is ound also in Arist. et Γ Ioo9' 37-39. πῶς υ ἄξων ἀθυμησαι τους φιλοσοφεῖν ἐγχειρουντας το γαρ ταπετόμενα ιίκειν τι ζητεῖν ἄν εἴη την ἀλήθειαν In AeSch. Ag. 39 διίκει παῖς ποτανὸν ὁρμιν and probata in Gorg. 7 C θνα ἔφη

87쪽

Madui Adversaria Cratica I 366 an Schan asstune a lacuna in the rst clause, in orde to provide a subjecto ἔχει so the Stilbjec cannot be vaguel things in generat', nor an ὀρθω ἔχει hie the Same a το ορθον ἔχει. o infert εὐσεβεῖν as advigSuggeStS M ulci lbe reimaturet to anticipate e niention os the Subject realec in the dialogue, vig. εὐσεβεῖν or ὁσιοτηs, whicli aster the manne o Plato xvlio visitet to preserve in sen)hilance os a Conversation se On Crito A is reserve so a later Stage ). A the sanae inae, is ἔχει is retai neci, it seenas certain Don ὀρθως αυτ πρῆξαι latit an infinitive is in suffect to ἔχει and the onlyrelevant subject is o prosecute one' sather o nian Statig later'. Elther inere re τι εγκαλεῖν se πατρὶ φόνου must be supplieci stomἔγκλημα albove or ve nauSt assianae the os o sonae Phras to esaine esseCt, Probabi τι ἐπεξιέναι πατρὶ θνου in vi ex of the hec ient recurrenc os inese vor is throughohit in chapter οὐ γαρα που- ἐπεξηεισθα φόνου αὐτψ, and again ἐπεξιέναι in Q in D Mπατρὶ φόνου ἐπεξέρχομαι : and Speciali dνόσιον γαρ εἶναι τι υἱον πατρὶ φόνου ἐπεξιέναι in ). Nox it vili l, adimitte Minat viaile ontiae ne han it is harsh to stippi τὸ ἐγκαλεῖν πατρὶ φόνου stomἔγκλημα, the insertioni the ther hand of in phras τι ἐπεξιέναι πατρὶ φόνου, xvlaether aster ἔχει or πολλῶν-and the lalter position

88쪽

περὶ των θείων, προλέγων αὐτοῖς τα μελλοντα, καταγελῶσι ος μαινομεν Ου, 3 - an A. In accordan e vitia his usua theory,

Socrates Scribes the initistice of the Atlientans in thei treatiment of Euthyplar to ignorance. 17. ἐπιτυχόντos is solio vest hi εἶναι in T. Schan remaric that where the veri, substantive appetir in only one of the two lea lingMSS B an T), ve are justifie in assuming interpolation Theaorist no the present participi os πιτυγχάνω προστυγχάνω,

90쪽

an optative re ver seldoin est ut See Schan Novae Commentationes Platonicae I 35 and ope on Aristotie' RhetoricVOl. 2, P. 328. 25. ἔκτεινεν ὁ κτείνας. A si equent idior in Plato: cs Apol. a D ταυτί μοι δοκεῖ δίκαια λεγειν ὁ λέγων. Notice stat κτείνω is rare in Attici se it is mund hien in ine olde uriters or vitia

imorali ty. He Sees a saniit ties have nothingo do vitii laequestion os illi and wrong and so a Plato agreed villi hina. But his motive in prosecutin his ather is tostly thous not

Sin. Se Gorg. 8om αυτιν πρῶτον οντα κατηγορον και αυτο και των Ξλλων ικείων και ἐπὶ τούτ* χρώμενον τ ρητορικη πως ν καταδηλων των δικημάτων γιγνομένων ἀπαλλάττωνται του με ἱστου