장음표시 사용
131쪽
liou se it nausi , avo id ed in piose iis occurrenc inicit is ne ostii any rc os that the Prose an i verse Vocat ut aries vere o coni pletelyclisterentiate i in his tinae sinii lari δόμος laould lbe avo id ed in prose
132쪽
36 et See Hom. d. . I i. or an accountis the intervie v. 363 s. ὁ ναυτίλοι- μάντιs dative os interest, in prophe forsaliors. V Pale quotes Hec. 267 ὁ Θρηξι μάντις an Phoen. 7
Θήβαισιν εὐίπποι ἄναξ.For Nereus as a prophe and esto er os in gis os prophecy, See Hel. I s. Hes Theog. 233 Νηρέα τ' ψευδέα καὶ ληθέα γ ἱνατο
367. Cinaemnestra murdere Agamemnon in thebath vhicla it vas herlut a xvi serio administer o hina: CL AeSch. Euna. 33, El. 56. 372. Menelaus deSire to emthrace Cinaei nnestra xvhornae linei tobe a murderes proves lain t be a laxi lenient in lais vi exus o crimeas Helen. 373. os εὐτυx. alae bein , as I thought, prosperous V os indicates the sulbjective natur of the lata Se . Notice the three enses of κλύειν τινος si hear sornething storia person genit os ablation , ethhea about a person genit of connectionὶ, 3 obe a Person: See 36.37 'αιῖos Mos coiirse olfective gen. vitia φόνον. 378. μέλαθρον, i. e. Aganaeinnon' hous to xv laici Menelaus ad hirougiat Hermione o his vanio Tron cf. 63.379. Notice in repetition os stri ita tenden cy vas to phitin early in the sentence speciali aster a negative, an it vas ille frequentlyrepeatex vitii the verb: Lai I. Sonaetimes it is repeated more han
133쪽
Talce πρωτόλεια a accusative in apposition to the actio os laesentence γονάτων θιγγάνω UM ny rs acies clas thy cnees.' See
388. τἄργα, no ui deeds' biit realities, the citia sacts of m condition. It is no xvlia I Seen to the ye', ut cha I endurein lac that tortures nae. For τἄργα, s. Tro. 233 τλήμων ἰατρὸς ὁνομ' ἔχουσα, τἄργα δ' oo, a Physici an in anne, o in realit t. 389. δεινὸν adversi: s. et λεπτὰ λεύσσω. 39o. M l od is non an i in nanae alone is est, V .e. I ania nae remanae villi, physica reali ty belli iaci t. For the antithesis, L . . o Iplii genia is aliout o sacrifice Orestes and presses in t teli his anne: e refuses, saying , o σωμαθύσει τοὐμόν, υχὶ τούνομα Uit S rn ibo lymo ira 3 nanae thoi has to
134쪽
136쪽
et The SS. ea ἔφυ κακος. Κ1rchliosi imagine a lacuna. The read in in the ex is Briinck's conjecture and the meaning IS, though no stibile in argumen I prove Minyseis a trite mend in action.' οὐ σοφos refers to the ac that Menelaus cross-examination hi ad ted Orestes to contradici himself in et he say the ginis are dilato , in et he say the Furies canae pon hi in vitile his mother' pyre vas stili varan in et Menelaus indirecti ibia clearly indicates in contradiction: Orestes repties Parnmot leverint quil)lbi in l)ut Pana a loyalmend,' impl3 in that Menelaus vas inclinet to the lae exac reverSe.
137쪽
that ne vilicii regat cis the phras a meant metaphoricali by Orestes an taben iterati by Menelaus Met iti I in ueri ruined' ille
he regariti an ait verse ver lictos ceria in anticio Sa3 s οἴσεται καθ' μοῦν
138쪽
139쪽
140쪽
Villi αἰνέσω stippi αυτ a olfeci, referring t ἔργον.
Eo s. Notice the change os inood si or the opt. ἀποκτείνειεν to thesiit indic Eνταποκτενῶ and λύσει the ut indic. ut a sui comiti sarnaore vividi γ' than in opi an is thei e re used in the an and 3M clauses os in prolaSis, sincerit is in theni that the action is containedagainst vhicli Tynd. speciali xvista es t warn his hearers.
series of miircler perpetitali recedes l)esore us, since thecias murcle sorthe finieriae in rendet another neceSSary. Sinai lar arguiment is sed against xvii in Hel. II 55 T