장음표시 사용
41쪽
o Nurnberg, and the host menti, an adviseris almostat the scholars of Germany The textis inis edition is admirabie ror a typographica mint of vie v. I lias, o vever, o critical
a. The ex edition is quali void os craticalim itance. In Isa in publislier uiger Rescius brought ut at Louvain a texi of the de sacerdotio, ofwhicli the editor vas icolas Clenard 3. In eo vo edition just naine n mentio ismacle os the manuscript o whicla the textris basecl. In IS99 a te in advance tua made, viae David Hoeschel publistae an edition of the de sacerdotio based on the readings os certain specifie manuscripis:
viet ine alatinus in ine alatine librar at eidel-berg), the Augustanus in in libra at Augsburg), e Coloniensis ait Cologne), an other os tess importanCe. Ho chel regarde ine alatinus and the Augustanus
42쪽
ination os his texi . e states that he made a Caresulcollation os ine alatinus and Aumstanus, removing thei errors filiing up ei Monae , an appendin ana aratus triticus vi hicli he had compile Dona inere ings of these manuSCriPtS. There is no comis Hoescher edition in in BritishΜuseum an have been natae to obtain one frontan other Oume. However through ine cincines of in meruli Vincent Benson, schola os Ne College, Oκsom, Iliave secured a transcriptis ine most importantos the cratica notes, an am satisfie ina noctingis importance has escapedinis attentio an aCumen. The hie value osmoescher edition lies no in inetexi, vilich seenas to Contain ille o Mus y the sonae- vlia confident statement in the litte-page se previous page, ootnote ), biit in in margina readings, deravedisoni the manuscript at ove mentioned. It should however be adcled that mannos these marmnalia areis litileor no value, and that HoesChel seenas to have niade noattemptri estimate the relative importance of his livo
4. Aster Hoeschelio separate editionis the de sacem dotio appeare so more than a Centu . ut in I 6 Io, eleven ear aster the publication o Hoescher book there appeared the rs volume of the reat editioni Greel os the complete vork of Chrysostoni bySi Henr Savile . his vori has justi eamaei sor Savile a reputatio as ne of the mos eminent Greelc
43쪽
scholare at this countr has produced an in manyreSP is it κhibit a scientific conceptionis e cluties
of an editor vhicli it uould hae difficultri parallel untii
by Hallam, no vnreasonat ly therarsi vo k of learningon a great Scale publistae in England Savile telis soliat a the basis os his xv texto the de sacerdotio lae used that osmoeschel but had correcte it vit ille id of tivo manuscript at κλω, one in the librar o Corpus Christi College, the theri that os ex College. The amount os nexu materialthat he utilige in the case of this realise a thus comparativel smalici but his extensive cnowledge os patristic Greelc, an his found udgnient, helpe hina noles in the de sacerdotio than in ther portions os his
edition. His ex is ne os the mos trusi vori lay thathas appeare 1 andes have neve dissere Pisoni hina vithou hesitation.
44쪽
κ INTRODUCTIONAt in en os me ighin an concludin volume os Savsse' edition here are Latin notes, both cratica and explanatorF, o the de ac They ared, in editor and ceriain f his Englisti friends oh Boys, Canon os Ely, Richar Μontam, an Oinem. s. Whil in Englariae the edition ausi described vas hein passed through in press the French Jesuit Fronto Ducaeus Fronto du Duc vas engam in aris ona similar asic. His edition vhicli include a Latintranslation os e Greel original, vas test infinishe at Fronto' early death l ut a complete in siκ volumes
by edericus and Claudius orellus. In I 636 an edition
Variant readings and notes, in Latin are to be ound a the en os volumes I, 4, and 6 of the originaledition. The Latin translation, vhicla vas by Fronto
himself vas base o that o Germanus Brixius Is 343. Accordin to ulter, in his Vorthies of En and the
45쪽
INTRODUCTYON EFor the ex of the de sacerdotio, Fronto sed ine Augustanus os oeschel, i din readings rom two Regii libri ' of these ne vas ,,ugiat by Francis I this is styled by Fronto in '): in other vas boughtb Henry II Fronto styles inis ΜS. M'). e also haut Nasore his membranae nobilissimi viri r Olivarii' M'): and the vetus interpretatio, vhic he consulted in the edition publishe at aris in Isa by Petrus Gromorsus. The editio princeps to vhici Fronto resereis no that of 323, but in Loiavain editio of 329, xx hicli e usuali Cite a L Ο Ι Ο.6. In the ear 7I Jola Hughes, Fello vis esus College, Cambridge brought ut an editio of the de Sacerdotio, opis ac Enarcis, impensis Edni tufe λ The book contain the Greel texi of the realise, viin Latin translation. refixed to the texi are valvat ledissertations o the Christia praesinood also a seos Chrysostor talcen roin Cave' historia ueraria, vhichia i in turn been borrowe Dona theriise by Savile include in his edition os the work of Chrysostona. Νotes, clites nos a critica Character, conclude Hughes'
In in first ex sentences of these notes Hughes explain in principi in accordance vitii vhich he had prepare L his texti me solio ved, e telis us Savile's
France.... The Fronto Ducaeus...caused inem tora e printed here rithimplicit satin and in obedience...onlyJoining thereunt a Latin translation and wine ther inconsiderable additions': p. I. G. Scheid δε optimis ci sonomi Minon Dissert. Wittenberi p. 35. Jeffer rara a bookseller. The ille of this edition is S . Ioannisci sonomi meisiesiscopi Constantinopolitani de sacerdotio Mes VI, Graece e Latine accessere risuriareones quaedam prooemiales e dignitas facem dotari, item S. cirrostomi uua e celiserrimi avra istoria ueraria desum a Mitionem adornmin, fra tionemque arietat Ioannes uiso A.M. ueris Iesu apud Cantabrimensis socius Cantabrimae... I 7IO.
46쪽
xlii INTRODUCTIONedition a belli inera est os ali but in a se v passages he had autopte the reading osmoeschel an Fronto. occasionali he hac differe stoin ali three editors, and
hadisse so the correctionis in teκt the manusCripi evidenCe accumulated by Fronto. us hes textris in no respeCt bet ter than hos of his predecessors buti his notes he osten advocates in triae reading, and supporis his vlews vitii Considerable learnin and judg-
7. t is convenient to rechon is an independent edition inat of S. Thirit y whicla appeared in C, MIridge in Iria: l ut is oes no professo lae more than a secon edition o Hughes' vois, po whichmus heshimself vas ens age at in time of his cieath. Besides the de sacerdotio, however, Thiriby' edition o Hughes containe the oratio a Dolica de M o Grego osmagiangus, the subjeci os inis oratio being, as vehave Aeen closely alcin to thatis Chrysostoni' treatiseo the praesthood As regariis the teκt Thirib telis us that the rsit vo Iooks, an par of theolaird, of the de sacerdotio
The ille o Thiriby' edition is S. Ioannis Chrysostomi de sacerdotio bri T. Graece e Larine quibus inersationes muradam praemisis conrea librasan falso inscripsum inreleri, Christianae iura Vinae casa, notasque arietat Ioannes mora A.M. Colum iesu an iri Sorius.- uis altera, priore illa emendatior et auctior accestis 5 iremin aianaen eiusdem sedis Archieris si de eodem aetumerus conscissa oratio a Dorica. Opera S. Thirib A.B., iusiam Collegis alumni. Cantabrigiae dipis academicis ivssensis Em me F, Binisolae Cantabr.
47쪽
INTRODUCTION xliii 8. IV no v corne to that whic is generaliy regataedas the standar editionis Chrysostom. I reser to inee titio by Dom Bernar demontisticonti a Benedictine mont of the orcle of Si tauri Froni III 8 o 738Μontiaucon vas engaged on this vo k an considering his ad vance age eighty-three at the time inhen itvva Complete it certaini bear testimonyrio his indefatigat te activity. There is no doub iliationisaucon vas energeti in the collectio os nexit materiai an anumber of homilies by Chrysostomisere so the fimitiine publislied in his edition. His prefator remarkSprefiκe to ac treatise, and the lis os Ch sostomwit the dialmae, o dissertations in his conclud ingvolume, although os a sonnexultat unaaethodica character, are neve theles very valvabie. It is however, impossitae
the problenas os textua Craticism. For a long tinae scholars have been a vare of theunsatisfacto mature os the critica fide os ontiaucon'sothemiserasesul edition and Pani thus relieve ' Dona thenecessit os demonstratin iis inadequac in regar tolli teκ of the de sacerdotio in particular. I nee onlyreser to the Clear an convincin proosismontiaucon's remissnes give by D F. Fieta, ne of the mos eminent editor os Chrysostona, in his editionis themoniilieson Si atthe v and wit this talenient L entirely
pp. in sqq. inus p. xiv covices non modo non contum bonus monat io, sed interdum ne infrexit equidem ... ne unum quidem fodicem nominarima aetas, sed unum,' - ,' alios, ' hoc vel illud Dora monens, um ris aerimitilaeris lectorem Iurit' etc. For illustrations of the unsatisfactorynatur os,onisaucon' apparatus to the de sac., se Durna of heia.
48쪽
would enablem to identis it biit telis us vaguel inata give rea lin has the suppore of tivo. threer or
wliere have been able to est them an neari alios the SS. he se so the de sac. have been in myliancis), Ι have mund inaccurate, sten Seriousi sin Furthermore, viaile recordin mere iniStalces os spelling, of tile or no significance, he init Potnis os realin portance. The angvage and style os Chrysostomhe hadiso sufficienti mastered, o that he is osten lectio preser an inferior reacling. In Shori, the critica parto montiaucon' edition is that whicti it is leastio sitae
49쪽
Ιt nee i hardi he aid that in scholarshi shewn in Benger observation is Aoum an inorous h. e also de a Latin translation. Froni Bengel himself ve learn litile a to the methodwhichise solio ve in constitutin his teκt. Η eis alis in genera ternis of having se in best os in manu-SCripis of early date. e raises in Augustanus of vhicla te made a resti collation), ut regatas ine Palatinus as interpolated. The versio by the verus
Iohannis Chus Ionii de sace otio libri sex maece inta e Graviaeocomiti et notis dinditabusque aucti, eo maxinne conrilis in coenobio An, Hemberricomm alumni, et ceteri qui Novo vitamento Graece imbuta sunt, ad scriptores eccleriasticos suων gustu inviserum faritique me hodo praeparemur. Opera D. Alberii Bengelis Mutordiae I 725. Besides thereuised e tition byaeo se belo vhthere have been inan reprinis of Bengelin the stereotype 1 auchnitet edition in i 825, 865, 872, 887, 9-ὶ.
50쪽
Lmpgi in I 8 34'. his is a revise editionis Bengel; but ivit additiona notes by Leo himself, and without the L atin translation vhicli Bengel hac appended. Thoe
The mos important assistance vias derived froni
Savile' edition and the editor expliciti states the
Leo Praefario sto his edition p. ix. Iohannis cir sostomi de sacerdotio libri VT. Ex recentione molae