장음표시 사용
323쪽
been an extra agant Mantonnes to intend that
iue more probabie, Our assertions Mould amountio no more than is me ad both been silent. So that even pon that seotin the authorit os this inscription ould e set aside and that wout be nouis sor, pumose But furtherine digamma F, hich appear in the inscription, is a strou argument se ita eius Ae lic: so that the digamma vas peculiar O that
dialec is a leas higia probabis Doni in epithe constanti give it The inscription has
324쪽
s ut the pomer of the aspiratio mur hetes to e thrice underatood, then 'tis lain, inat a character expressive of it vas ready athand 7 he reason os ou meetin vit suiniustances ps MON O is that in ther paris 5s os Greee there vas no capita character den ting the aspiration νω- his, a mel a theother aspiration uis, Masclest in e supplied by the 'mmon norma loquendi. O the contra-
is absolutet necessam sor uiso destitute fine artiale neve mans thes ame. No whan is in I hau ad another conjecture out the genuine or of this inscription, Whies I am persuade has been stili surther Corrupted. The reading, hic no prevatis, is no verse; and the language, heu consid re a prose, is vitious. The natur os proserequires the article Iou missi ανδραις, as vellas illi σφελας, Ἀνδριας, or ather ὁ τε ἄν-
325쪽
Iians might perhaps novi os this hiatus, thoughthe Athenians id not. The T in APTI DI imagine has been writton ea in s in thoiater times, is Way of explicationis the ancient pomer of that figure so vhat is nomWriuea αυτος is neve used as a trisyllabie. Gu procede udb Is I allo Το Dur 3s8 opinion, it oes 1 no means conclude against mine. For instance, i in Aeolians rota ΗΜΙ, and the more modem reas Em Mescit theresore soliom, that the more ancient
in observe, that ou re holindri maintain a negative illation. must mea ancillationuniversali negative. ut missi submission Iconceive the caseo M os a very differentis ture. O asseri, that hat mas ritte Taythe ancient Greeks Was ometimes pronounced
326쪽
Lasib, is the Delia inscription e a Imaintain, Aeolic, tis lain that our accounto dialecta an archaism is no applicabie ocium our account, the distinctio of dialecis a sar a relates to the PoWer ημι and ειρα, di no tali place, ill the characteris,as introduced. ut accordiu to, explication, me have in his inscription the PoWer ημι ita 529 tho sor εμι. o that Our notion os a chais an mine os dialecta re sotadiso toeoincide. am preparin for the res a volume in
the critici alvan which I shali destre the lavouros γο to revise , missi the soli ing inscription rEmendationes in Poeta Graecos, Aristopb Dem, Euripidem Sophoclem, Aeschylum, ab limachum, The'critum, Pindarum, esiodum,
Homerum. . Praemittitur dissertatio de praecis Puis Poetarum dramaticorum metris, ut et de Accentibus cum φευδωνυμοι tum veris. Hanc excipiunt Avimadversiones a Cl. Benueii Emen-
327쪽
dationes in duas priores Aristophanis Fabulas
In praefatione autem disseritur de aspirationo et prout in sermone Homerico obtinebat. Amen extremum claudunt alterae Animadversiones in hileleutheri ipsiensis sive enueii Emendationes in Menandri et Philemonis Beli.
quias. Phave a preti large apparatus, ut os Whic these emendations filiae selected opon Aristophanes in particular bout 15oo. For one of thesea am in a great measure obligedio a conjecture os ours, Leci Lys. P. 686. For the nonsensica αναπολειψαι ou Write απολισθα M. ut me have by this means a