Commentaries on the Epistle of Paul the apostle to the Romans

354쪽

tioned the remembrando oscit, legislation, o the iving of the laW, suem to e hero poculiarly applied to the things

Vitring thiniis that tho gloryV Was the illari fire and the cloudin the Wilderness but Beza, Grotius, and Hammon agre Willi Calvin, that the arcis meant. Se Us lxxviii. I. I seem to refer O those manifestations made in the tabernacle, an afteriuard in the templo bypeculiar brighines o splendour. See Ex xl. 34 ando ings viii. II. This splendour orator signified God' presence, a privilege peculia to the

Israelites. Ed. Whyae mentions covenanis,' αἰ διαθηκαι, in the plura number hasbeen variousi accounte for,- there ere various things included thelandis Canaan, prosperity, and the pri esthood, there ere three laWSthe moral, eremonial, and judiciat, there ere severat repetition O the

356쪽

But, have here a remari ablo passage,-that in ChristtWo natures are in Such a manne distinguishod that thsyaro a tho fame time unite in tho very person o Christ:

Stuar has in a most convincing manne vindicate the true an obvi-ous mea ning of this clause There si readingi an authority, norinnyearly version, that asseet the genuinenes of the received texi an it isama gin What ingenuit has been exerci sed by various criticito evade thepta in constructionis se passage, a remarkable instance of the debasing poWeris preconeeived notions It is omeWhat singula too thatis mowho professe at east the doctrinem Christ' divinity, uel as Erasmus, Whitis, and Loche, have attempte to mali changes in the texi and thosola the mos pari conjectural by hicli the obvious meanin is hollyaltered. It is ver clearly shOWn by tuari, that the ver positio of the Ords, and thei connection illi the contexi, ill admitis no ther constructiontha that whichisur version OniatnS.

357쪽

6. Not a though the wordis God . Neque tamen, quasi exciderithath aken nono ess0ct. For therare verbum Dei non enim Omnes quino ali Israel,hicli are o Israel: sunt ex Israel sunt Israelitae: 7. Neither, ecause the are the . Ne qui sunt semen Abrahae,see o Abraham, are the ali chil ideo omnes filii; sed in Isaac voca-dren: ut In Isaac hal thy see bitur tibi semen: bo called; S. That is, he whicli are the . Hoc est, non qui sunt filii car-ehildrenis is flesti theseire not is, ii filii sunt Dei; sed qui sunt tho hildrenis God but the chil filii promissionis, censebuntur in

9. For his is the word of promise 9 Promissionis enim verbum hoc At this time ili I come, and Sara est, Secundum hoc tempus Veniam, shali have a son. et erit Sarae filius.

358쪽

Were this tho ea se the veri, Whiel folioWs, as Wolfus say and proves by an example, mus have been in the infinitive ood Piscator ars thesa me. ut Pareus and Itia talae this O be tho meaning and o oes