Philodemus: On methods of inference: a study in ancient empiricism

141쪽

στοχαστικῶς ἔχειν.

143쪽

sin precedent for Epicurus state1ment that ali perception Sare true, and that ali knowledge is derive ' ultiniatet froni perception ε' the early physicians anticipate i Epicurus useo perceptibi object a Sign of the unperCeived arid Nausiphanes fornaulationi the niethocli vallid inductive inferenceis very Clos to the Epicurean position. The interest in napiri Cisna Continue to Sprea after thecleathis Epicurus, and the later Epicureans, includ in Philoclelmus, vere Strongi influen Ced by the late developnient in

145쪽

the placed rhetori in the alter roti p. Here again the evidenc is n)osti froni Philoclenius Rhetoric Philoclenius

146쪽

132 PH1LoDEMUS O MEΤHOD O INFERENCEquotes the fosso vin passage rori Alexinus, the Megaraan philosopher

In another place the vi ex that rhetori is a ConJectura aricis attacked by Philocle naus

.st Philocl. hel. Suupl. 40. 5 Ibid. 27-28. βῖ Sextus Adv. Math. V. 62. β32 het. Suppl. 14.β3E. g. ibid. 2, 3, 4, 16, 27, 32. Plato, o Courge, ad Cornpared theni in the Phaedrais and the Gorgias.

147쪽

V . . . the good politici an has inferre by mi uction the things

UCon)ecture is the substantia proos o an unknown iact

148쪽

M Q. Meth. Inf. VII, XXXV XXXVI.

149쪽

TheS PASSAge are Sufficient to Ahox that in the Hellenistic perio essentiali the sanae fornaulation of napiri a naethoda PDear in a nun)ber o different aris an sciences dici Clear