장음표시 사용
151쪽
seu D74 3 Γm sic os fetet the alter in hand hoc quod mihi in manust cf. 594his the intention expresse in 317 mio punctuat desino fetet hoc etc. thus bringing ut the fac that tho phraso whichris the subjecti fetet is the virtual Objecti desinos illi fetet,
335. nempe, etc. course continuing the Seli-correction, and ludicrousi inconsistent With the assertion 1 317 immo : ay a
152쪽
343. Quin . . . CCuDRA: See note On 172.3AS. mirum aut nouom: cf. Asin. 43, neque novom neque
mirrem fecit Pseud 434, quid mirum fecit ' quid nouom
3Φε. qui . . . tio 1RCiam : 0hat ama to do ithraim for thoca Se i hoc See 62 2. Do Atea in consequence, accordin9ἶν cf. Miles 734, et postea qui homines probe essent, esset is i. e. ei8 annona uilior. Ea thus a maid aduresse her mistres in Miles 1263. Ei Ainct ef Aul. 23, I d spea to im dii I no fuar o distoplescantingit the Way of Women nunc sic inam. eumPAE: νhimself eumpse, ipsum *48. 2); for the rendering Cf. Cicero, Brut 134, erat talis ut cum quosdam audire qui tum erant prae8tantes uideretur esse inferior, cum autem ipsum audires butin hearin him by himself sine comparatione, non modo contentu e88eS, Sed meliuS
In thi Sceno no ne character are introducet, ut there are mute
153쪽
SAB. Eummis . . . inctuAtriis icit ali his misthi an main; --dustriis is plural in this phra Se by aSSociation illi opibus ς ei. Taminstos the sirem, III. i. 232, Sh i my goodS, In chalielS. HOW-ever, the plura may have an elementii Xaggeratio incit, a pacibus perfectis has in Persa, 753. 3Α9. DerisAe: hardi an example iis genuine perieci infinitive active illi a Ver Ο deSiring - though his might stan in a legalpassage in the archaic Style,-but ather the exclamator periect D71 2 periit in the infinitive erilem: See note On 3.3SO. Coictit the exclamator perfeci in the thir perSon. Atalautumat it is oubliui hether tho case iter stabulumst i a adnominat dative D62. 3 cf. Capt. 23, nec consilentiae 8quam hospitiumst nec deuorticulum dolis alS Cicero, de in . Pomp. 70, praesidia periculis aut adiumenta honoribus), O n genitiVe ei. Trvc. 587, stabulum sagiti Persa, 418, stabulum seruitricium Trin. 553, hospitiumst calamitatis . 351. Salu . . . Ealuti for the repetition, Se 79. . The hyperbole a a favorii on cf. Capt. 529, neque iam Salti Seruare, si uolt, potest; at S Terence, Adelph. 761 Cicero, pro Font. 10, 21;Verr ii 3 131. Ei Cupiat should sh destre contrasting the moOdwith si uolt in the examplo usi citet, it is haruri dra a distinction. 352. ita introduces a coordinate clause D74. 3); note the alliteration and the vigor of the metaphor mocto nii 334. 353. Peregre for the Variou loca relation this adver may
154쪽
362. Ego sumne . . . qui a iniri common formula elSeWhere in the Orster sumne esto ille infeliκ here ille mean the proverbial, h48. 1 cf. Persa 594, esto ille doctus leno paene in foveam decidi Terence, Adelph. 866, est ille agrestis, saeuos, etc. Without a defining nou me have ille opulentissumus Trin. 493 α Croesus;
A Juvenal X. 10 uses uiribus ille conssus imito the Crotoniat; and Cicero Mur. 60 alludes o Achilles in the morda illi fortissimo
uiro. his se of ille ite becomes lighil contemptuous i the notorious, but frequently mean the iamOUS, e. g. ille reae
Philippus Aul. 704), ille prostitatus Theti Epid. 35) andisse Iuppiter
155쪽
Rosian seleet to claim o Cyrano de Bergerae V. i.), - que diable allat ii faire dans ceti statere p36B. Qui . . . ago : hat in I to do asto is common in the deliberative question, an passes for an indicative 66 1), ut though a secondary assimus also occur three Or Our times, it ma be an id subjunctive ci Gree εγω, indifferenti indicative or subjunctive). A considerable number of theros Singulariorm occur in his sage cf. 774); hil asto is ound in Cicero Loren cite pro Quinet. 53 an ad Att. Vii. 20. 2 an in tho
156쪽
omitte subjeci, Se 9 72 1. qui . . . Tectitio . . . fuit: e noteon . Etiam assain; a litti pleonastio illi red-itio ci thophraSe etiam atque etiam, agnin and again. '
3B2. ECCET autem : cf. Miles 207, OllOWed in 209 by ecce autem, Without appreciable differenee.
157쪽
rule in Plautus niter Verbs of cauSin and effecting, o niter curare
393. Qui Bi . . . adeamus: Suppos isse leave Witti quid sias illi quid quod the ellipSi i Vagueri quid si With a Subjunctive, as here, has much the effect iis Simple deliberative subjunctive. non tio longe no an inch SonnenSchein); hoc is accusativo ofextent, to e construe ultimatel With abeamus for the sensu fhoc, of the diom huius non faciam Terenee, Adelph. 163 I han)t
haps rom a Blendis potin animo esse quieto et Trin. 759 and ut)animo si quieto.
158쪽
1 SYNOPs18. - Tranio, aiter gettin his roysterors of the stago toreturn o more, aVe Callidamate in Ae V. Scone , verses 1122 1181), rema in in boastiui Solitoquy, Speaking ut, a though it,ere another prologue, hi plan for Deloolin his id master plans hicli, With thoi execution an uiamasking, fili up the res of the play. 2 ΜΕΤΗΕ - Verse 407 is a trochai septenarius recitative),ς 18 19 408 430 are iambio senarii.
go T. pluma hau intereat patronus a Cliena there' notis hair' pluma breadi ureiaet patron an client patronus in his master' last speeeli Tranio hau go a sortii commission as his advocate ei. 244). ci ci. Truc. 171, Onsse aliter est amicus atque amator. Tolae Cor Ciet hominem conscience thorousthly fristhienso ne reho). prolae See note On 4. Co : O the SenSe, i. Trin. 1169, cruciatur cor . . . et metuo. Ciet here in a SenS Oi excire common in later nuthOPS.
fortiter Atu. 489, namque hoc qui misi quis dicat, etc. miles, 1077, meri bellatores stlynuntur quas m si quas hic pressitatis fecit it amounts to the fame hin ii e suppi With potiatur 414 the
antecedent eae eis. iEAignat . . . facita plannei and Tecuted for the fore Oi dissὶst nata . . . nequiter, ei ApuleiuS, et Vili. 28,
quasi contra fas sanctae relissionis dissiynα8set aliquid. ΑΙΑ. niquict neci Sometimes Spelle ni in Plautus olWays in thegroup quid ni an quippe ni ci the compound ni-mirum The
159쪽
g15. Et the postponement of et in it claus is rem arkable, ut not unparallelex et Horace, Sat. i. 4 68, at bene si quis i et uiuat puris manibus, etc. Aiter ali, ii e ad in Horae proueniantque sine malo, Ne hould Suppi another proueniant for tranquille ui. Smithysides of Horace, Di 19. ). The folio in examples ii Ahom
o cur ill alter it Aeneid, iV. 351, me patris Anchisae Se imasto). . . admonet in Omni et turbida terret imasto ibid. i. 640, arstior hic campos aether Se uestit), et lumine ue8tit purpureo JuVenal Vii. 182-183, parte alia lonyis Numidarum fulta columnis i surgat Sc. cenatio), et alssentem rapiat cenatio Olem. Φ16. EiCulci f. 381. quam the antecedent is the following
g19. Qui . . . Egrectere : Tranio Ara loSt in admirationis him- soliis a philosopher that he has orgoite the orde he avo i 404. iamiam: Seli-corrective like immo in 33, cf. Curc. 230, quis hic est
160쪽
ASO. uncte, ut hoc eae loco. EATCinam : sack of ies inponam cf. Cicero, ad Fam. Hi 10 7, te autem quibit mendaciis homines leuissimi onerarunt Persa, 182, eius auri quae mandata Sunt nerabo Miles, 35 est illum probe iam oneratum stussed' huc
1 CHARACTERS. In thi Scene Theopropides, ho ad been to Egypt to improve his fortunes, is introduced, attende by tW muteporters. He S a typical ather i Graeco- Roman comed in uingstupid an havin a mora code that asked economyi his son and
nothin more ui 1160 L). His mos individua trait is his timidity,