M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro A. Cluentio Oratio, edited with Introduction and Notes Explanatory and Critical by W. Peterson

211쪽

156 PRO A. CLUENTI0.

213쪽

mutor . . . cupidiore, a more intereste supporter.'

instrument.

ΟΡ. 8αluti desperare, g 68. ad excogitantum acutissimo. For his se of au suo

215쪽

160 PRO A CLUENTIO.

non molocior non modo non se ona . suppressione iudiciales, imbegglomon in couris of justice.

iugulatum lis. With his throa cut. Wo migh saytha tho tW provious ordicis had dei him,ithous adsito stan on.' his figurativo us is ver common in Cicero: cp. rιinci. 44 α Att. i. 16, 2, cum illum plumbeo stladio inst=dαtum iri. αmen diceret: α Herenn. v. I, uno iudicio simul multos iugulaveritis.

vor of sa in is, in iaci, iten itsoli ut in the subiunctivo.

216쪽

eo quom cuminimo me reputo.

1ongo intervallo, i. e. though it is a long time ago no . Nam perinde ut opinio, etc. Similarly pro ut , g 69, quid quisque voluerit costitαrit,dmiserit non eae crimine sed eae moribus eius qui arguitur est ponderαndum. XXVI. miserrimis in ocis et inanissimis, in appositionwith domi suae : tr. a refched, overty-Africhen habitation. Dr. Boid suggosis that locis may bo a corruption incis, octieinisomelimes used os a single houso.

nihil enim, etc. The enim implios an ollipso putthe question hecause, etc. Ρ vultus enim vestri, g 89. Praecipitantem, intrans. r. Moli, hocis offering oliis ali, totius is him a push.' p. pro Γαb. Post gra tis est homines imprudenti I sos non erister I urgere vero αcentes αut prαecipitαntes impellere certe 8 inhumanum. For impel-lαmumcp. also ac Ann. iv. 22; laus Aul. 590. perditum prosternamus. So perditum perdere, Fam. Xi V. 1, 5 ep. also urgere αcentes in the passage jus quoted. Tr. Mocis dono for letis administer the ou de grace.'Noto the alliteration. TA. hoc consuli. c. hoc testimonii, g 73. his is ho genitivo i ho indosinito holo, dependent on a neuter ad joctives also nihil, and om adverbS, quo eo, te. CneS. B. G. iii 24, quid hostes consilii αperent eae8pectαbat. Roby,

lestitutione, ausal ablativo, With Θαtos, inragod with Oppianicus tor revin playod them falso. Thoro mus hoSome misrepresentation in the argument. Staienus had votodio acquis Scamandor. Was it tho Otho crimes of Oppianicus that convince him h could nos scapo 3 And why was thevordi et nos practicali unanimousa Se Introd. P. XXi. ut erat, etc. Cp.4 23 praeposterus is usedistin Who ut the cartiolor thelior Aeci perversus denote a mani crookod Ways. r. Mithhis usual Wrong-headednes an perversity. Staienus ought

217쪽

162 PR A. CLUENTIO.

nos to hau bogun isti Bulbusci nions bulbi canis in afford inner, not eforo. Reiorenue ma here e made o omeillustrativo alter containod in the notes to tho editor'ATranslationis his speech, . 133. Quid tu, o. is: I say, Bulbus. So again, Quid tu' inqui Paete 72. Such olliptio questioris, common in Plautus, servo to leadis to tho urther intorrogati v Which

confirmator, Securi ty. ut blandissime potest, 'in his mos insinuating manner.

218쪽

si se Ligurem fecisset Cicor says that ii Statonus h ad talion the cognomen Ligur, instead of Ρaetus, thos whoanem his characto would hau missakon his nationali ty hs Would have been ahen, in aut a belonginis tho barbarous triboo Ligurians. Cp. pro est. 69, of Sextus Aelius Ligus, qui coynomen ibi eae Aeliorum imαgintibus adripuit, quo αgis

crure plunum.

219쪽

164 PRO A CLUENTIO.

220쪽

nummarii pauci sed omnes irati: Tho venal ones among them, though nos numerous, ere ali in a age. Tho

nullorum eius similium Thi seem a sortii unconsciolas orinvoluntary complimen to the ench; Oppianicus certainlyhad calculatod 74 that hero ero ixteon ready to talio his money. ut in his holo account of this triat, Cicerois obviousi tryinito throw dus in ths yes of tho juryli is no ad dressing. See Introd. D. XXi. omnes irati Tlis fosso in sentones sic eiusmodi iudices infesti tum reo venerαnt shows that this is o bolimitod to tho nummarii udice8. in campo, at politica eloctions, held in tho Campus

XXVIII. Eoos tibi, i and belloidi For the nominative