장음표시 사용
51쪽
instructive by inose via rima stili doubi in superiorityo Savile' textrio that os ontiauCon. In regar to the de sacerdotio the editor of the revise Benedictine edition retulere a valitat te servicet scholars by publisiain ver sui an accurate collations os three manuscriptS, PariSinu 492, Parisinus 799 an Cocleκ assioneus These collations may be Mundat the end of the farsi complete volumes i.e os vol. i pars auer hos the edition. 13. In igne' Patro in Graeca, Ch sostoin's Work occupy Olunae 4 to 64. The e sacerdotio is in volume 48. There is nothin to indicate vliat
almos entiret based onmontiaucon though supplemented by readings stor Savile. I 6 In I 86I, Fr. Dubner , who hac assiste Th. Fixin the labour os re-editing Chrysostoni in the Benedictine edition publistaec a volume os selections Doni Chrysostoni in the Fir in Dido series. t vas to have been solio veclti Volumes containing Selec votas os ther Greelc
Bene lictine revised edition o I839. Ol. xui, p. iu of E lorus Novae Edisionis Is usus editionis Samius per niversa olumini Metam Mon faticoniano operi incredibiliter profuis sed quominus ab ipso Iarim
52쪽
xlviii INTRODUCTIONFathers, vire Latin version ; ut in enterpriseisi nolget beyonc in volume jus mentioned. Dul ne telis us that herionsuli ed sor in teκ of the
de sacerdotio Mur manuscripis of these inree vere os the tentii centu , in remaining manuscript of the elevent Centu .
The manuscript used by hina include arisinus 492andiarisinus 799, of vhicli sui collations vere a state l)published in I 839. IS. In I 867 D. Euelpides publishe at Ainens inefirs part of a projecte edition os the de sacerdotio, consistin of the farsi book vitii an introduction Thiseditiones have no seen There is no copy in the British
I 6. In I 887 Carl Seliniann edite in de sacerdotio xvitia notes, clites nos a homileti tendency so the se of Roman Catholic Seminaries. e madem independent investigation os the manuscripis; but his notes containa sesu staternent of the reaclings adopte bry the early editors, an os the manuscript whicla supportoliose reacting S. II. The texi os the present edition is based ona Desii furve os ota, an on a cossectionis much ne vmateriai. of this nexu materia in large pari vas amasse durans a visit to aris in December I 4, hen
The evidence whicli ve posses a to the original
54쪽
56쪽
There are severat ther SS. os the de sac. at
Florence'. Romet enice , and Vienna ivlaicla seeint be of importance. I regret thates have been unal le
In groupra, iis belle than fidis, an Seems to meto herili best single ΜS. of the de sac
57쪽
vhic osten ive identica reaclings. As in previous volumes of this series, an asterisi is sed to denote the fimi hand of a,S. the figureo to denote the Corrector's hancl, .g. γ', H For Convenience the revilings of Μonisaucon' edition os III 8 have been cite a Vuli Π Citations roni the de fac in later UriterS. The solio ving writer quote passages Dona the de
Sacerdotio: Anon. - Amonymus Scriptor Vitae S. Chrysostomi later inansso A.D. se Savile' edition visi p. 299 The passage
58쪽
III. Ancient translations of the de sacerdotio.
The folio vin Syriac SS. in the ritishmuseum Contain version o portions of the de sac. I have given
59쪽
Νo Arabic o Arinenia version is lino vi to me. The Arabicversions Mould probabi come froin the Syria o the Coptic, and thus becomparativel late. Einiopi versions also is an exist xx ould almost certaint he a late a theosin or 6th century, a I eam froni D A. Cosine of the Bodleiana rary. For Coptic an Simoni versions see Bardenhewer os ci . p. 328 Sqq. est author is generali allude to a vetus interpres.
60쪽
lvi LNTRODUCTIONon ine litte-page. t may be ot serve 1 reat Lornier SPeak of three Separate version sine anni et loci notitia: an possibi Benger copy belonge to ne of theseeditions. nos the vetus interpretatio vas publishedat Basle, but vii various alterations. nother editionappeared in Isa a Paris apud et miro morsum. The value os inis versio by the wn interpres is considerable. His identit 3 has notaei been made ut many hola that he was Anianus the Deacon os Celeda, vlio defended elagianisin see Jeroine, αν. I 43 2.
