Commentaries on the Epistle of Paul the apostle to the Romans

262쪽

That the moral, and of the eremonial laW, is meant here, itineontestabi evident rom hat the Apostlo adit in the folloWin verses. Hoquotes the moral la in the nexi verse ho calis his laW, in ver. 10, the

Our common versio is evidenti incorrectis to this clauso Thesronou αὐτῶ or ἐκωνῶ, is to e supplied There is an exacti similarellipsis in h. vi. I. Bez an severat thers, a Mellis Our Version, have sollOWed a reading, πώαν τος, hici Griesbach disregard as of Πο

263쪽

CHAP. VII. 7. EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. 251

7. What hali e say then Is 7. Quid ergo dicemus Lex pec tho a sint God sorbid. Nay, I catum est Θ Absit sed peccatum non had notanown in but by th laam: cognovi nisi per Legem concupiS-

for Iaad notan wndust, except the centiam enim non noveram, nisi LeXla had sa id, Thou haltio covet. diceret, Non concupiSees. S. ut sin ta kin Occasio by the S. Oeensione autem Sumpta, sec- commandment, rought in me ali catum per mandatum essecit in me

authorit and tris inconsistent With the usual phraseolog of tho Apostle.

tonii usual style Of theraposite, to ho What siti as intended, it is calledhore destre it is then in in th visi, in tho inclination or dispositionwithin. An this ver sinsul destre in tentii commandment distinctly

264쪽

destituto of udgment, ut that thuy etain a distinctio in

266쪽

dead. mortuum:

9. For I Was alive ithout the la 9. Ego autem vivebam sine Legeonce; ut When the commandment aliquando adveniente nutem man came, in revived, and I died dato peccatum revixit, 10 And the commandment, Whieli 10. Ego autem mortuus sum; et reus ordaineri life I Oun to e deprehensum est a me mandatumunt death. quod erat in Vitam, cedere in mortem. 11. For in takin Oeension by II. Peeentum enim Oeensione the commandment, decetVed me, an sumpta per mandatum, abdurit me ab it ste me via et per illud occidit: 12. Where re thecia is oly, 12. Itaque ex quidem saneta,

and the commandinent holy, and just, et mandatum Sanctum, et justum et and good bonum.

Most commentators talae the opposite ieW, that the irritationis sinoeensioned by the la is more speciali meant here. The two ideas, tholinowledge and the excitentent, or tho increas of sin by the log stro nodoubi referrexto by the Apostle in these verses. Ed. This laus is rightly separate frona me forme verse for it clearly ann uncos liat is illustra ted in the folio vin verses Vithout the law, means ithout in lino viedge of the la v. The lasci linown an nothnown stili. Ad. Aliquando;V οσε formerly While he a a Pharisee, When ethough himself lameless. Crities osten mali dissiculi ies heia there aronone. What is aid here of ein alivo ithout the law, or hen the a vis notinown and of the commandinent supposed toto ordis boini undio e uiato deuth, is stili exempli sed in tho character of men, and talios place in the experience of ali ho re brought ut os dari ness, a Paul vas uni marvellous light. Experiene is osten the est expositor. To understant this assago, o more is necessur than to read hat Paul says of himself in I d. iii 4-9 and ais in Gal. i. 19. Ad.

267쪽

genera proposition, and thon to xplain tho su sed by his

269쪽

13. Was then that whieli is good 3. Quod ergo bomm est, mihi made death unt me Θ God sorbid. in mortem cessit Θ Absit imo pec-But in that it might appear in catum, ut appareat eccatum, erW0rhin death in m by that Which bonum operatur mihi mortem uti good that sin by the command fiat super modum peccans peccatum ment might bee me exeeedinisinsul per mandatum.

270쪽

258 COMMENTARIES O THE CHΑΡ. VII. 13.

λ his an hardi be admittod. The postlo in Corinthians vidently